13:17:47 RRSAgent has joined #eo 13:17:47 logging to http://www.w3.org/2005/03/11-eo-irc 13:17:54 rrsagent, make logs world 13:18:05 Wayne has joined #eo 13:18:11 zakim, this will be eowg 13:18:11 ok, shawn; I see WAI_EOWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 12 minutes 13:18:18 zakim, ping me in 10 13:18:18 ok, shawn 13:24:03 judy has joined #eo 13:28:19 shawn, you asked to be pinged at this time 13:29:03 Andrew has joined #eo 13:29:21 meeting: EOWG 13:29:27 chair: judy 13:29:40 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has now started 13:29:46 +??P0 13:29:58 zakim, ?? is Andrew 13:29:59 +Andrew; got it 13:30:00 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005JanMar/0166.html 13:30:18 +Shadi 13:30:23 +Shawn 13:31:24 +Henk 13:31:24 +??P1 13:31:47 zakim, ??p1 is Justin 13:31:47 +Justin; got it 13:32:00 zakim, please mute me 13:32:00 Justin should now be muted 13:32:13 +??P3 13:32:21 +Judy 13:32:31 zakim, ??P3 is Wayne 13:32:31 +Wayne; got it 13:33:13 + +1.206.679.aaaa 13:34:56 zakim, +1.206.679.aaaa is Jack 13:34:56 +Jack; got it 13:35:19 i can 13:35:32 your welcome 13:35:50 zakim, who is here? 13:35:50 On the phone I see Andrew, Shadi, Shawn, Henk, Justin (muted), Wayne, Judy, Jack 13:35:52 On IRC I see Andrew, judy, Wayne, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, shawn, shadi 13:36:14 scribenic: Justin 13:36:19 present: Andrew, Shadi, Shawn, Henk, Justin, Wayne, Judy, Jack 13:36:36 s/scribenic/scribenick 13:36:36 scribenick: Justin 13:37:44 Wayne: I am teaching a class on Web Architecture and Usability and they will be working on retrofitting web sites. 13:38:07 Judy: We have a retrofitting document 13:38:26 Topic: Outreach Updates 13:38:54 rcastaldo has joined #eo 13:39:02 Hi folks :-) 13:39:10 hi roberto 13:39:16 hi 13:39:23 Jack: There is fair amount of interest withiin folks in Boeing on retrofitting web sites. At some point and time we will be quite interested in it. 13:39:28 +??P6 13:39:40 zakim, ??P6 is roberto 13:39:40 +roberto; got it 13:39:49 present+ Roberto 13:40:30 Judy: Daniel Dardiller (sp?) did a conf. talk about W3C standards in europe 13:40:47 s/Dardiller/Dardailler 13:41:10 Andrew: We ran a trial workshop on writing for the web with an emphasis on web usability and accessibility. 13:41:20 i am interested as well 13:42:17 -roberto 13:42:23 Shawn: WAI IG had a discussion suggested EO do writing guidelines for web accessibility. 13:42:39 The NILS Web Writing Workshop is outlined at http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/workshops/writing-melb.html 13:42:58 +??P6 13:43:12 zakim, ??P6 is Roberto 13:43:12 +Roberto; got it 13:43:36 Topic: Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools 13:44:47 Shadi: While the structure stayed the same...I reworded a lot. As I worked on strategies for selecting it became its out section. 13:45:43 Shadi: If we can go at the last section I have grouped and worked some of the items that to me make some more sense...I would be interested in hearing people comments. 13:46:42 Shadi: In the considerations section I have added some examples, a little bit of users, and how it fits in the process. 13:46:57 Judy: Brief general reactions? 13:48:35 Henk: In the top navigation bar, most of the links are not numbered except one. 13:50:54 I've read section 1, and I do like it 13:52:06 Henk: We are not evaluating the checks we are evaluating the web sites. Would it be better to say to help users preform web accessibility checks. 13:52:30 Henk: I struggled with the second section of the intro. 13:53:49 s/section/sentence/ 13:54:47 Shadi: Evaluation reviews 13:54:54 Henk: That would work. 13:56:08 Henk: In what eval tools can't do...there is the word in the last sentence....precise results or accurate results. Which is better? 13:56:35 Judy: I am concerned with overall that that sentence is very discouraging. 13:56:35 "accurate" is better 13:57:12 Judy: It looks too exclusive. 13:57:33 Judy: Whats the main thing we are trying to communicate? 13:57:52 Wayne: Is this trying to say that the user has to pay attention to learning the limitations of the tool that they use? 13:58:01 Shadi: Yes 13:58:14 Shadi: it is a tool and it needs to be used correctly. 13:58:58 Henk: I do agree with Judy...we have to deal with the two ends....there is no tool with which you can check and repair your whole site with everything. 14:00:12 Wayne: In that sentence...there maybe a skilll requirement to use some tools effectively. 14:00:30 Shadi: correct, i don't know any tool that doesn't require some skill. 14:01:16 Judy: Section 2 - considerations 14:03:24 s/skill/skills - or basic understanding 14:04:03 Andrew: I think this needs a little bit of copy editing...but its good 14:04:23 Wayne: The organization was explained. These are the big things we want people to think about. 14:04:47 not really 14:05:41 It looks fine and language sounds plain 14:06:56 Judy: I am not sure where to fit this in. The size of this document is a little overwhelming. I keep worrying about an individual who is looking for quick things and lands in this. I don't know if there is anything....the intro is very well broken out. 14:07:12 Judy: In considerations...maybe those need to be h3's 14:07:29 agreed 14:07:37 h3's would help 14:08:42 Shawn: I had the same reaction when i tried to skim it. We talked about short slide set about these documents. It would be good to give people a version where its quick and link to more details. 14:09:43 Shadi: are the titles for the overall sections...are those descriptive enough...that a experienced user would jump to features. Can we play with the in page navigation? 14:10:37 Wayne: Being able to navigate to the places is the trick here. 14:10:54 Wayne: The content looks like the write stuff if your looking for a tool. 14:11:09 Henk: the content is not the problem...but the formatting is an issue for me. 14:12:04 Judy: shadi, maybe you can use the h3s and see how you react to the titles. 14:12:16 Judy: Section 3 - Characteristics 14:14:58 zakim, please unmute me 14:14:58 Justin should no longer be muted 14:15:38 Henk: in page feed back tools...last sentence use maybe and some. 14:17:22 Andrew: I had a problem with that sentence also 14:17:42 Shadi: The sequence in which the table cells are perceived.... 14:18:48 Wayne: maybe features might be a little bit better and a little more plain language. 14:19:41 Henk: You might have one tool with many features...a tool with wizard interface feature 14:19:55 zakim, please mute me 14:19:55 Justin should now be muted 14:20:13 zakim, please unmute me 14:20:13 Justin should no longer be muted 14:21:03 Shadi: I need some more discussion 14:21:19 Judy: Tools that generate reports 14:21:45 Wayne: What if you dropped off tools? 14:23:07 Shadi: It was exactly like that before....in the previous version I was approaching this from the user interface...now i realize its about the characteristics. 14:25:34 Henk: the word mediate is off. 14:25:50 Judy: The sentence is still kind of complex 14:26:30 I have to leave the call for few minutes 14:26:33 Judy: Section 4 14:26:39 zakim, please mute me 14:26:39 Justin should now be muted 14:27:23 Shadi: Is it easy to skim? 14:27:25 II need to leave early now, goodbye 14:27:36 bye Wayne 14:27:44 -Wayne 14:28:08 Shadi: If i can some more comments on the structure rather then the content 14:31:01 Henk: We need more white space 14:31:03 I'm back 14:31:45 Henk: Reliability...false negatives and positives seemed like they are switched. 14:32:19 Henk: How about reporting false failures? 14:32:51 Henk: second explanation...detecting wrong ones, its reporting false failures 14:34:19 Shawn: Rather then going into the details of which is which....what if just sayed false negative or false positives and then here are the examples 14:34:57 Judy (and Andrew agreed) that the terms are used correctly 14:34:57 Judy: We could just give the examples and not use the terms. 14:35:31 Judy: Its a strong concept that seems to resonate with people. 14:35:57 shadi: How about examples, then the terms 14:38:12 Andrew: Under checkpoint coverage...the whole idea of spidering seems to have been dropped. 14:39:11 Shadi: I was having difficulties with where to place that. its a more overaching issue. 14:39:39 Shadi; I grant your point about manual checkpoint coverage could be reworked...to reflect how tools can help. 14:42:06 zakim, who is here? 14:42:06 On the phone I see Andrew, Shadi, Shawn, Henk, Justin (muted), Judy, Jack, Roberto (muted) 14:42:08 On IRC I see rcastaldo, Andrew, judy, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, shawn, shadi 14:43:21 Judy: How do we want to remind ppl to comment on the list? 14:44:00 Shadi: If you can send out a request to the list. 14:44:35 Judy: Ill point people to the changelog so people now what we have talked about 14:44:43 Topic: WAI Flyer 14:45:06 start of requirements & changelog: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-flyer.html 14:45:13 Judy; the version in the agenda was a linear one 14:45:39 Judy: We use it mostly as a print document. 14:46:19 Judy: Flyer on one side and quick tips poster on the other side. 14:46:36 Judy: We have newer sponsors. 14:48:03 Judy: If we can take a look at resources and activies. 14:48:45 q+ to point out overlap with translations priorities 14:49:12 ack shawn 14:49:12 shawn, you wanted to point out overlap with translations priorities 14:49:36 Shawn: We talked about the core set in the translation policies. 14:49:40 agreed 14:52:00 Judy: Can I see where people are at? 14:52:34 Zakim, please unmute me 14:52:34 Justin should no longer be muted 14:53:01 Andrew: Taking a look what this is for and who its for would be a good idea 14:53:12 Jack: I am still trying to get an idea of what this is for 14:53:31 Andrew: some things obvioulsy need to be included - documents/suites developed in the last few years 14:53:35 Jack: I get the idea this is for someone who is brand new. 14:54:05 Judy: this is a one pager to hand out at the conf. 14:55:40 rough draft of translations core set from last week's f2f discussion: 14:55:41 WAI QuickTips (short), http://www.w3.org/WAI/References/QuickTips/, translations of WAI Quick Tips 14:55:41 Implementation Plan 14:55:41 * Introduction to Web Accessibility 14:55:41 * Essential Components of Web Accessibility 14:55:41 * Why Standards Harmonization is Essential to Web Accessibility 14:55:43 * Overview of the Web Accessibility Initiative, http://www.w3.org/Talks/WAI-Intro/, [note: updated quarterly... @@ Overview of the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Slides ] 14:55:46 How People with Disabilities Use the Web (medium-length) 14:55:48 [Business Case Overview Slide Set] 14:55:50 [Evaluation page(s) after revised] 14:56:20 zakim, who is here? 14:56:20 On the phone I see Andrew, Shadi, Shawn, Henk, Justin, Judy, Jack, Roberto (muted) 14:56:22 On IRC I see rcastaldo, Andrew, judy, RRSAgent, Zakim, Justin, shawn, shadi 14:56:28 I'm here 14:57:27 what WAI does from redesigned home page: 14:57:28 WAI develops... 14:57:28 - guidelines widely regarded as the international standards for Web accessibility 14:57:28 - support materials to help understand and implement Web accessibility 14:57:28 - resources, through international collaboration 14:57:28 WAI welcomes... 14:57:29 roberto: It is very difficult to find a good summary of the activities and resources of WAI 14:57:30 - participation from around the world 14:57:32 volunteers to review, implement, and - promote guidelines 14:57:34 - dedicated participants in interest groups or working groups 14:58:25 Roberto: One of the most important things is that we have alot of educational materials. 14:58:59 zakim, please mute me 14:58:59 Justin should now be muted 15:00:47 Judy; I want to get this interim revision out soon. 15:00:50 start of requirements (just revised from this discussion): http://jigteam.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-flyer.html 15:01:51 http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-flyer.html 15:03:06 Judy: reading the requirements doc 15:03:57 Judy: This is the place where list our sponsors. 15:04:19 Judy: The sponsor list is pretty outdated 15:05:42 Judy: We need to see if the core set fits here. 15:06:24 Judy: Roberto talk about how its key for first impressions 15:07:12 yes 15:07:25 -Henk 15:08:33 test? 15:10:20 Judy: For the core set what do people think about that? 15:10:25 Judy: It doesn't include the guidelines 15:12:56 Judy: No meeting next week 15:12:58 -Shadi 15:12:59 -Jack 15:13:00 your welcome 15:13:00 -Shawn 15:13:04 -Andrew 15:13:05 HI all 15:13:06 rcastaldo has left #eo 15:13:09 -Roberto 15:13:10 thanks justin 15:13:10 -Justin 15:13:13 bye all 15:13:15 regrets: alan 15:13:17 -Judy 15:13:18 WAI_EOWG()8:30AM has ended 15:13:19 regrets+ doyle 15:13:19 Attendees were Andrew, Shadi, Shawn, Henk, Justin, Judy, Wayne, Jack, roberto 15:14:43 ill do it to the minutes later 15:18:56 Justin has left #eo 15:28:29 zakim, bye 15:28:29 Zakim has left #eo 15:28:36 rrsagent, draft minutes 15:28:36 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2005/03/11-eo-minutes.html shawn 15:34:26 shawn has left #eo