Existing Op Name Mapping Requirement (two issues):
- Current wording is ambiguous
- Wrong granularity (too coarse)
- Part of motivating issue should be addressed more generally:
- Service should specify its client requirements in WSDL
- Does not go far enough -- too complex
General:
- Interactions have verbs (whether explicit or not)
- Verb should be transmitted & explicit
- Verbs should be described in WSDL
- Granularity:
- Verb is needed with each message
- Op name is too coarse in some cases
- WS-Addressing is one (partial) solution
