14:31:56 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 14:31:58 zakim, call Yoshio-home 14:31:58 ok, Yoshio; the call is being made 14:31:59 +Yoshio 14:32:03 Zakim, agenda? 14:32:03 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda: 14:32:04 1. Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0463.html [from DanC] 14:32:07 2. XML Results format [from DanC] 14:32:08 3. Protocol Spec [from DanC] 14:32:09 4. Services [from DanC] 14:32:10 5. Test suite maintenance, syntax comments 14:32:11 6. Testing Values [from DanC] 14:32:12 7. SPARQL SOURCE Issue [from DanC] 14:32:47 Eric - can we talk about the tutorial after the call to plan a meeting w/ Dave and Steve 14:33:03 andy, sure 14:33:15 (damn, get my phone line fixed, and the tele-vultures descend immediately) 14:33:15 (wondering where Janne is) 14:33:29 Zakim, who's on the phone? 14:33:29 On the phone I see EricP, DanC, HPbrs, Yoshio, Simon_Raboczi, Farrukh_Najmi, Kevin, Kendall_Clark 14:33:31 HPbrs has AndyS, DaveB 14:33:33 +PatH 14:33:54 zakim, take up next agendum 14:33:54 agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review records and agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0463.html" taken up [from DanC] 14:34:00 +SteveH 14:34:38 Zakim, pick a scribe 14:34:38 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose PatH 14:34:40 meeting record http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0463.html APPROVED 14:35:30 Yoshio, would you prefer to meet or not meet on 21 Dec? 14:35:58 Either will do 14:36:42 next meeting: 21-Dec 14:36:47 scribe: SimonR 14:37:26 Jan 4th? I prefer not holding a meeting 14:37:54 28th and 4th are both good for me, ironically 14:38:08 I can do the 28th and the 4th as well. 14:38:15 I can do 6th 14:38:49 * My telephone environment is awful tonight, so if you want my exact answer, please ask on irc (^ ^;) 14:38:51 subsequent meeeting: 11-Dec 14:39:03 JosD has joined #dawg 14:39:06 subsequent meeeting scribe: SteveH 14:39:31 RESOLVED: to cxl 28 Dec, 4 Jan 14:39:40 +JosD 14:40:21 Zakim, next agendum 14:40:21 agendum 2. "XML Results format" taken up [from DanC] 14:40:50 ACTION: DanC owner of issue 'yes or no questions' (was pending protocol doc) CONTINUED 14:40:59 ACTION: SteveH own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue CONTINUED 14:41:15 ACTION: EricP migrate some Algae UnionDisjunciton test cases CONTINUED 14:41:35 ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March 28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days). Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week. CONTINUED 14:41:49 ACTION: DaveB to write an XML result format 14:41:55 DONE 14:43:09 simon re results http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0475.html 14:43:11 * yoshio will be dropped of for a while: let me retry telephone connection (it's so awful) 14:43:20 ACTION: AndyS to review Dave's XML result set format 14:43:23 DONE 14:43:33 -Yoshio 14:43:35 ACTION: SteveH to review Dave's XML result set format 14:43:54 action -6 14:44:00 action -5 14:44:06 +Yoshio 14:44:35 SteveH, do you plan to write a review? 14:44:48 ie, shall i continue the action item? 14:45:06 (I was about to say that Steve's brief report discharges his action to my satisfaction and ask for different opinions) 14:45:15 DONE 14:45:25 (maybe jumping the gun here...) 14:45:25 zakim, drop Yoshio-home 14:45:25 sorry, Yoshio, I do not see a party named 'Yoshio-home' 14:45:31 zakim, drop Yoshio 14:45:31 Yoshio is being disconnected 14:45:32 -Yoshio 14:45:49 zakim, call Yoshio-home 14:45:49 ok, Yoshio; the call is being made 14:45:50 +Yoshio 14:46:57 PROPOSE to publish XML result set 14:47:22 Abstentions from PatH and SimonR 14:47:25 RESOLVED 14:47:38 ACTION EricP: publish XML result set document 14:48:30 XML result set document is http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rf1/ 14:48:32 ACTION Simon: counter-propose something re unbound results 14:48:46 Zakim, next agendum 14:48:46 agendum 3. "Protocol Spec" taken up [from DanC] 14:49:20 heavy breather 14:49:36 ACTION: KendallC to publish "SPARQL Protocol for RDF" pending approval from TomA and AndyS 14:49:50 Zakim, mute PatH temporarily 14:49:51 PatH should now be muted 14:50:05 PatH should now be unmuted again 14:50:09 Zakim, mute PatH 14:50:09 PatH should now be muted 14:51:11 CONTINUED 14:52:07 agenda? 14:52:23 Zakim, next agendum 14:52:23 agendum 4. "Services" taken up [from DanC] 14:54:14 ACTION: KendallC expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients 14:54:18 CONTINUED 14:56:04 Kendall: someone from NASA (Florida) showing interest in SPARQL and RDF 14:56:17 Zakim, next agendum 14:56:17 agendum 5. "Test suite maintenance, syntax comments" taken up 14:56:20 ... interested in interop festival in July or Aug 14:56:42 That's intersect with my travel plans for F2F5, in all likelihood. Great! 14:56:48 ACTION: SteveH is willing to adapt his testing infrastructure to generate input/output RDF/XML and typed nodes into manifest file 14:57:10 CONTINUED -- waiting (short term) on a Jena release 14:57:35 ACTION EricP: make sure all dawg tests are world-readable now and going forward 14:58:15 DONE 14:58:24 action - 13 14:58:51 ACTION EricP: come up with a specification for the "non-XML" syntax (may be turtle) 14:58:56 DONE (by dave) 14:59:05 action - 14 14:59:25 DanC: inclined to release Turtle with test suite 14:59:35 DaveB: prefer separate document 15:00:30 KendallC: what's the hard part? 15:00:38 DanC: shopping around the AC 15:00:50 Theoretically, CONSTRUCT is sort of an RDF serialization syntax... 15:00:51 KendallC: would like to see it separate 15:01:08 AndyS: let's not separate it now 15:01:19 Simon: yep 15:01:26 ... consider with other charter amendments 15:01:37 DanC: let's noodle on this for a week 15:01:57 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-001 $Revision: 1.32 $ 15:02:53 ACTI^H^H^H SteveH has updated the above document 15:03:08 Fwd: SPARQL: graph syntax should be N3 subset Tom Adams (Tuesday, 30 November) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0387.html 15:04:45 ACTION: EricP to deal with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0387.html, perhaps by proposing something to the WG. 15:06:32 SteveH observes that one of the approved tests (2a?) includes the optional commas in the SELECT clause. 15:10:15 URI? 15:10:18 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sparql-query-example-2-4a 15:11:33 Kendall: I prefer required commas ala ?name, ?mbox 15:11:49 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:11:49 On the phone I see EricP, DanC, HPbrs, Yoshio, Simon_Raboczi, Farrukh_Najmi, Kevin, Kendall_Clark, PatH (muted), SteveH, JosD 15:11:51 HPbrs has AndyS, DaveB 15:12:09 ericp: not opt, not present 15:12:20 danc: required 15:12:26 yoshio? 15:12:40 simon: not opt, not present 15:12:55 -Farrukh_Najmi 15:13:03 kendall: required 15:13:08 ack path 15:13:10 abstain. sorry I got disconnected 15:13:23 pat: optional, but if not opt, not present 15:13:27 Zakim, mute path 15:13:27 PatH should now be muted 15:13:35 Zakim, who's talking? 15:13:38 (Does that make any sense?) 15:13:44 wow 15:13:45 DanC, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: EricP (15%), DanC (65%), Yoshio (70%) 15:13:51 +Farrukh_Najmi 15:13:52 Zakim, mute yoshio 15:13:52 Yoshio should now be muted 15:14:04 ok 15:14:12 Steve: not opt 15:14:25 JosD: not opt 15:14:41 no commas 15:14:51 andy: not opt, not present 15:14:58 dave: not opt, not present 15:15:45 it's NOT a consensus, FWIW 15:16:05 editors lean for not opt, not present 15:16:34 ACTION DaveB: propose replacement for tests that have ?foo, ?Bar 15:18:04 Zakim, next agendum 15:18:04 agendum 6. "Testing Values" taken up [from DanC] 15:18:35 DaveB notes action is for all tests 15:18:48 actions by ericp, simonR done 15:19:05 danc: which way do the editors lean? 15:19:37 ericp: seems safer not to allow value testing in the graph pattern, given some reluctance and unknowns 15:20:14 andys: syntax is separable from graph matching... 15:20:18 -PatH 15:20:29 (bummer; meant to ask about PatH about this) 15:20:41 AndyS: re semantics, relates to D-entailments 15:23:09 ACTION SimonR: propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax uniform to graph constraints. CONTINUES. 15:23:37 Simon: I'm mostly taking stuff out. Andys: I think you put a lot in... [bnodes?] 15:26:19 Zakim, next agendum 15:26:19 agendum 7. "SPARQL SOURCE Issue" taken up [from DanC] 15:27:03 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/source-named/ 15:27:18 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/source-named/query-9.1.rq 15:27:35 AndyS: I couldn't confirm those results 15:27:46 Dave: I no longer prefer that design. now prefer "untrusted graphs" 15:28:04 I need to drop off due to another meeting. My apologies for the spotty participation. cu 15:28:14 thanks 15:28:27 -Farrukh_Najmi 15:28:32 FarrukhNajmi has left #dawg 15:28:32 theres a typo on line 12 of result-9.1.n3 15:28:53 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:28:53 On the phone I see EricP, DanC, HPbrs, Yoshio (muted), Simon_Raboczi, Kevin, Kendall_Clark, SteveH, JosD 15:28:55 HPbrs has AndyS, DaveB 15:29:36 I missed the question, sorry 15:29:40 yoshio, what do you prefer we do about SOURCE? get rid of it? use Andy's "untrusted graphs" design? other? 15:30:24 I prefer SOURCE remain 15:31:01 If anything, I object to the fuzziness involved in making FROM advisory. It should be rigorous. 15:32:24 ericP has joined #dawg 15:32:30 tracking provenance and data federation is so important 15:32:52 (yes, it's so important that we should take our time and get it right and not rush it in v1, for my money) 15:33:28 (for your money??) 15:33:37 ( in my opinion) 15:33:51 +q 15:34:00 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0421.html 15:34:11 (examples) 15:34:58 ACTION DaveB: update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/source-named/ w.r.t http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0421.html 15:35:05 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0373.html 15:35:10 The proposal 15:35:19 ACTION: JanneS propose text for hard failure in the protocol draft 15:35:21 simon, it is "q+" 15:35:37 Yoshio: thanks. :) 15:36:06 ACTION: DanC suggest formal definitions for SOURCE. CONTINUES 15:37:37 +PatH 15:38:26 SimonR: we could publish the document without source but making (reasonably) sure that we leave room for it 15:39:03 DanC: end of agenda. IRC log will serve as meeting record unless someone wants to do otherwise 15:39:04 ADJOURN. 15:39:34 -JosD 15:39:37 moi moi 15:39:38 AndyS, ericP, are we going to talk about the workshop? 15:39:39 PatH: do patterns have bnodes? AndyS: no. 15:39:56 aye, tutorial 15:39:57 -Yoshio 15:40:01 -Kendall_Clark 15:42:15 -DanC 15:42:25 -Kevin 15:42:28 -Simon_Raboczi 15:42:34 -PatH 15:43:35 RRSAgent, make logs world-access 15:43:38 RRSAgent, bye 15:43:38 I see 16 open action items: 15:43:38 ACTION: DanC owner of issue 'yes or no questions' (was pending protocol doc) CONTINUED [1] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-40-50 15:43:38 ACTION: SteveH own (i.e. propose resolution to) disjunction issue CONTINUED [2] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-40-59 15:43:38 ACTION: EricP migrate some Algae UnionDisjunciton test cases CONTINUED [3] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-41-15 15:43:38 ACTION: EricP to find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March 28 Feb - 4 Mar (2 days). Some WG preference to Mon/Tue of that week. CONTINUED [4] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-41-35 15:43:38 ACTION: SteveH to review Dave's XML result set format [7] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-43-35 15:43:38 ACTION: EricP to publish XML result set document [8] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-47-38 15:43:38 ACTION: Simon to counter-propose something re unbound results [9] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-48-32 15:43:38 ACTION: KendallC to publish "SPARQL Protocol for RDF" pending approval from TomA and AndyS [10] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-49-36 15:43:38 ACTION: KendallC expose our walking tour data to SPARQL querying clients [11] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-54-14 15:43:38 ACTION: SteveH is willing to adapt his testing infrastructure to generate input/output RDF/XML and typed nodes into manifest file [12] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T14-56-48 15:43:38 ACTION: EricP to deal with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0387.html, perhaps by proposing something to the WG. [15] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T15-04-45 15:43:38 ACTION: DaveB to propose replacement for tests that have ?foo, ?Bar [16] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T15-16-34 15:43:38 ACTION: SimonR to propose test case for scalar constraint with syntax uniform to graph constraints. CONTINUES. [17] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T15-23-09 15:43:38 ACTION: DaveB to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/source-named/ w.r.t http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004OctDec/0421.html [18] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T15-34-58 15:43:38 ACTION: JanneS propose text for hard failure in the protocol draft [19] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T15-35-19 15:43:38 ACTION: DanC suggest formal definitions for SOURCE. CONTINUES [20] 15:43:38 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/12/14-dawg-irc#T15-36-06