19:56:20 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 19:56:36 zakim, this will be tag 19:56:36 ok, Stuart; I see TAG_Weekly()2:30PM scheduled to start 26 minutes ago 19:59:19 Chris has joined #tagmem 19:59:50 timbl has joined #tagmem 20:00:47 TAG_Weekly()2:30PM has now started 20:00:55 +Stuart 20:02:38 +TimBL 20:02:46 +DanC 20:03:24 zakim, dial chris-617 20:03:24 ok, Chris; the call is being made 20:03:25 +Chris 20:03:49 zakim, who is here? 20:03:49 On the phone I see Stuart, TimBL, DanC, Chris 20:03:50 On IRC I see timbl, Chris, RRSAgent, Zakim, Stuart, noah, DanC, Ian 20:05:04 meeting: TAG telcon 20:05:09 chair: Stuart 20:05:16 Scribe: Chris 20:05:28 Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/11/08-tag 20:05:47 DanC has changed the topic to: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/11/08-tag (PR is out! woohoo!) 20:06:07 Stuart: WebArch PR is out! Woohoo! 20:06:26 +??P29 20:06:31 Stuart: Focus this week is media types 20:07:00 zakim, ??P29 is Paul 20:07:00 +Paul; got it 20:07:10 zakim, who is here? 20:07:10 On the phone I see Stuart, TimBL, DanC, Chris, Paul 20:07:11 On IRC I see timbl, Chris, RRSAgent, Zakim, Stuart, noah, DanC, Ian 20:08:16 DanC moves to adjourn on lack of quorum 20:08:21 Topic: Meetings 20:08:24 I didn't actually so move 20:08:34 sorry, I thought you did 20:08:34 paulc has joined #tagmem 20:08:41 I'm at risk for the 15th due to family foo 20:08:50 Stuart: Who can make next week 20:08:56 Paul: Checking 20:09:17 Chris: Can't make it, f2f 20:09:26 Paul: Can make it 20:09:53 Stuart: should we have the meeting 20:10:01 Paul: offer to chair 20:10:09 Stuart: can you do the agenda 20:10:16 Paul: Yes, may need a little help 20:10:27 Stuart: Chair for f2f meeting 20:11:01 DanC: Offers to do floor control but not to do an Agenda 20:11:30 Paul: Suggests Norm and Paul, will discuss in next 24 hours 20:11:59 Stuart: Can attend remotely, phone or video 20:12:27 Paul: Do we have detailed arrangements for f2f? 20:12:40 DanC: not complely 20:12:42 +Roy 20:12:58 PaulC: Should we switch to MIT video conf if available? 20:13:15 Stuart: Can attend overlap in working day plus a little early evening 20:13:20 " 29 November, Stata Center, D507; 30 November, Stata Center, 346" -- an internal page 20:13:46 ACTION Stuart to determine video facilities at his end 20:14:10 TimBL: We have voip and isdn set up, in Stata center, one particular room set up 20:14:41 ACTION: Paul look into Stata center video facilities 20:14:51 ACTION: Stuart to determine video facilities at his end 20:15:05 Stuart: Scribe for next week? 20:15:14 DanC: at risk for next week 20:15:29 Roy: At Apachecon, may be able to attend, not scribe 20:15:52 Stuart: leave scribe to now 20:16:11 ACTION: Norm and paul, do meeting page and consider split chairing 20:16:25 Topic: Meeting records 20:16:54 Stuart: accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/0163.html as true record? 20:17:08 DanC: did Norm have an action there? 20:17:13 No, it turns out 20:17:59 No objections, so resolved 20:18:09 Topic: Issues List maintenance 20:18:18 Roy has joined #tagmem 20:18:50 Paul: While doing monthly report, issus were not up to date, Chris reminded me of a findingwe had issued. public uses that list, had to track through minutes 20:19:07 Paul: Important to make a conscious decsion how to track ongoing work 20:19:19 Paul: Ian used to do this, what do we do now. 20:19:41 DanC: Ian suggested taking the HTML and edit it, to include decisions 20:19:51 Paul? Pointer to the most recent finding? 20:19:55 DanC: not sure 20:20:15 Stuart: There is a separate findings page 20:20:20 (the findings page was created against my advice. hmm.) 20:20:41 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings 20:21:17 DanC: (scribe missed) 20:21:55 Paul: Dan and Chris are splitting some of the things Ian did? 20:22:12 Chris: Offers to update findings page if needed 20:22:27 Stuart: No one is familiar with the exit system ia was using 20:22:36 DanC: We could just create HTML 20:22:46 Stuart: Someone needs to look after it 20:23:02 DanC: willing to split task with Chris 20:23:08 Chris : OK 20:23:27 Regrets+: Noah 20:23:40 Topic: Monthly report 20:23:52 Stuart: Thanks for most recent onthly report, paul 20:24:36 Paul: Slides for AC meeting, what did we decide to do slides or to give up the slot and do a brief report 20:24:43 DanC: I recall we did, yes 20:24:55 Paul:So if no slot, don't need slides 20:25:03 Stuart: Yes, i recall now 20:25:15 "There was little support for doing a TAG panel at the AC." -- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag.html#tagac 20:25:47 Paul: We want time on TP but AC is all up to date on WebArch review 20:26:23 ACTION: Stuart: respond to Ians request for slides clarifying we don't expect a panel slot 20:26:53 Topic: TP liaisons 20:27:00 Stuart: no progress this week 20:27:19 DanC: Double booked, Data Access and TAG 20:28:07 Stuart; for TP we were flexible about when on Mon/Tue but not on moving to Thu/Fri; only want half a day 20:28:32 Paul: Does it stil lmake sense? 20:28:46 Chris: Yes, starting wor on AWWW 2.0 20:28:56 Stuart: And introducing new TAG members 20:29:02 Topic: TAG charter 20:29:10 Stuart: Now out for AC review 20:29:35 Stuart: Need to track review comments 20:30:02 Paul: Thanks the Team for the review comments before AC review 20:30:19 Thanks to team for their feedback on TAG charter comments. 20:30:40 Noah thanks Ian and others for, prior to the AC review, attending to some of the concerns that I and IBM had raised. 20:31:33 Topic: WebArch Publication 20:31:43 Paul: what about editorial comments ? 20:32:02 DanC: Transition meeting was 90minutes plus, lots of discussion 20:32:27 DanC: Deadline is closing a couple days earlier, apart from that same as the plan of record 20:32:44 DanC: Comm Team decided not to extend after AC meeting 20:33:13 DanC: comments , will deal with in due course 20:33:33 Dan: sent mail, please look at it 20:33:41 Stauart: leave for next week 20:33:59 DanC: Aganda request, specific comments on PR 20:34:32 ACTION: Paul put discussion of PR comments on the agenda next week 20:35:22 Chris: where does call for testimonials go? 20:35:35 DanC: Its in the WBS form, already done 20:36:14 Chris: OK, my concern that we ask in time 20:36:42 Paul: Testimonials from non W#C Members, eg Roy? 20:36:57 DanC: Roy would be a n easily arguable exception to this 20:37:02 Roy: Okay 20:37:43 DanC: Although from Day, that might relate to whether/when they join W3C 20:37:49 Dan: Translations of AWWW 20:38:19 http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Translation/ 20:38:36 Chris: (explains Ivan Hermans translation RDF suooper thingy) 20:38:56 Stuart: How do they happen? 20:39:03 Chris: mailing list for this 20:39:07 http://www.w3.org/2003/03/Translations/byTechnology?technology=27-pubrules-html 20:39:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag.html#plan234 20:40:44 Chris: Does WBS ask for multilingual testimonials? We do not ever translate testimonials 20:41:04 Chris: Useful to clarify this 20:41:25 ACTION; Chris to edit WBS form to clarify we invite multilingual testimonials 20:41:34 ACTION: Chris to edit WBS form to clarify we invite multilingual testimonials 20:41:47 tuart: Anything else to do? 20:42:06 DanC: Scare up testimonials and reviews is always a good idea 20:42:32 DanC: hope thatcomments can be justified in terms of decisions already made 20:43:23 (ftf BRS where timbl attended remotely is where we figured out "namespace document" text, says PC. thx) 20:44:00 (discussion of canada/us curency wrt Paul and Dan's bet) 20:44:33 Topic: Media Types related issues 20:44:47 (webarch call for review WBS form is http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/webarch200411/ , member-only, fyi) 20:44:48 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Nov/0027.html 20:44:58 Chris: I sent a mail shortly before the telcon 20:45:12 wow! what a collection of code-words! "3023 update (was Re: Agenda TAG Telcon: 8th Nov 2004)" 20:46:50 Chris: (reads mail) 20:47:10 DanC: "xml encoding declaration and 20:47:10 the charset (if supplied) should match" needs to be a MUST 20:51:58 Chris: (talks to fast to minute, but most is in the email) 20:52:53 ACTION: Roy, point to a constraint on registering media types not to duplicate information easily discoverable from content 20:53:19 Roy: Security checkers have to understand both and enforce both 20:53:42 TimBL: At root, is XML a sequence of characters or a sequence of self describing bytes 20:54:21 TimBL: Very nice that XML is self describing in that way, defines as a sequence of bytes, self describing character encoding 20:55:06 Chris: Much easier on authoring tools to deal with a single in band mechanism rather than an undocumented, per server, out of band mechanism 20:57:31 Paul: WebArch 1 and Finding both say the charset param is authoritative so rewriting is needed whan saving to disk 20:57:44 Start AWW says its an error if they disagree 20:57:59 (i heard Stuart refer to "our finding", not AWWW) 20:59:42 Chris: concend with DSig and UTF-8 as required by canonical XML ; proxies should not break signed content 21:02:44 http://www.docbook.org/specs/cd-docbook-docbook-4.3.html#media-type-registration 21:02:50 oops 21:02:54 Instructions to subscribe 21:02:55 http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/index.html 21:04:04 Topic: http://www.imc.org/ietf-xml-mime/index.html 21:04:29 So this is the issue that impacts WebDAV 21:04:40 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#putMediaType-38 21:04:55 TimBL: WebDAV works on bits, including a fileneame, no metadata is transferred 21:05:23 Roy: distinguishes between save and sending properties 21:05:34 ack dan 21:05:43 DanC; Can we get QA to look at this and see what implementations do 21:06:33 CL: there seem to be 2 ways to update the web: 21:07:07 ... W3C seems to advocate updating with PUT, while the rest of the world seems to use ftp/scp to update the bits, and the metadata gets done some other way 21:07:20 ... WEBDAV seems to be a protocol for updating the latter model 21:07:28 s/for updating/for automating/ 21:08:04 ... [missed some]... [something] lets you transfer a MIME type and then thorws it away. 21:08:17 WebDAV throws it away 21:08:29 ... Jigsaw handles this better: makes an exception [missed some] 21:09:19 RF: the WebDAV protocol doesn't say to throw away the media type. it's unfortunate that some servers to that. 21:09:20 Jigsaw lets you send metadata, and makes a per-resource override if needed so that the requested media type is n fact used 21:09:49 Chris: gets the impression some email discussion on this would help 21:11:43 DanC: who cares? Is this architecxtre or software engineering 21:12:17 Stuart: so is it implemented consistently? 21:13:56 DanC: we need more implementstion experience to discuss this 21:14:37 Stuart: Staw poll on asking qawg 21:15:18 a few in favor 21:15:40 noone spoke actively against (the poll faded out a bit) 21:15:46 Roy: might be moot or overtaken by metadata and URIs. Generalised to ref to metadata in messages, not just requests or one type of request. Already covered? 21:15:56 Stuart: Or content-type overrride 21:17:52 ACTION: Chris explain in more detail in emailabout ftf modelvs put model wrt metadata and what is being modelled; one resource or the start and end of a workflow 21:17:58 -Paul 21:19:15 Meeting adjourned at t+79 21:19:19 -TimBL 21:19:20 -Roy 21:19:21 zakim, bye 21:19:21 Zakim has left #tagmem 21:19:21 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Stuart, TimBL, DanC, Chris, Paul, Roy 21:19:32 rrsagent, pointer? 21:19:32 See http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T21-19-32 21:19:37 rrsagent, bye 21:19:37 I see 8 open action items: 21:19:37 ACTION: Paul look into Stata center video facilities [1] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-14-41 21:19:37 ACTION: Stuart to determine video facilities at his end [2] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-14-51 21:19:37 ACTION: Norm and paul, do meeting page and consider split chairing [3] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-16-11 21:19:37 ACTION: Stuart: respond to Ians request for slides clarifying we don't expect a panel slot [4] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-26-23 21:19:37 ACTION: Paul put discussion of PR comments on the agenda next week [5] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-34-32 21:19:37 ACTION: Chris to edit WBS form to clarify we invite multilingual testimonials [6] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-41-34 21:19:37 ACTION: Roy, point to a constraint on registering media types not to duplicate information easily discoverable from content [7] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T20-52-53 21:19:37 ACTION: Chris explain in more detail in emailabout ftf modelvs put model wrt metadata and what is being modelled; one resource or the start and end of a workflow [8] 21:19:37 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/11/08-tagmem-irc#T21-17-52