14:26:27 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 14:26:33 +DanC 14:26:36 +??P21 14:27:01 howardk has joined #dawg 14:27:09 +??P25 14:27:12 zakin, ??P25 is AndyS 14:27:18 morning all 14:27:20 zakim, ??P25 is AndyS 14:27:20 +AndyS; got it 14:28:13 zakim, please dial ericP-617 14:28:13 ok, AndyS; the call is being made 14:28:14 +EricP 14:28:40 +HowardK 14:28:58 Good evening 14:29:39 DanC: Possibly trouble -- I can't seem to reach Zakim. You might have to find a backup backup scribe. 14:29:48 roger 14:29:58 +??P28 14:30:00 Zakim, pick a scribe 14:30:00 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Yoshio 14:30:08 Zakim, +??P28 is SteveH 14:30:08 sorry, SteveH, I do not recognize a party named '+??P28' 14:30:10 NO! 14:30:18 Zakim, pick a scribe 14:30:18 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Kendall_Clark 14:30:25 Zakim, pick a scribe 14:30:25 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose DaveB 14:30:27 Zakim, ??P28 is SteveH 14:30:27 +SteveH; got it 14:31:04 +PatH 14:31:06 DanC has changed the topic to: RDF Data Access 28 Sep. chair: DanC; scribe: DaveB 14:31:13 Zakim, next agendum 14:31:13 agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review record and agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0539.html" taken up [from DanC] 14:31:48 +[ASemantics] 14:31:54 Zakim, who's on the phone? 14:31:54 On the phone I see Yoshio, DaveB, Kendall_Clark, DanC, HiroyuiS, AndyS, EricP, HowardK, SteveH, PatH, [ASemantics] 14:31:57 did JanneS volunteer scribing for next mtg? 14:32:04 yes 14:32:08 patH has joined #dawg 14:32:09 roll call 14:32:29 as above oOn the phone, correct spelling 14:32:33 HiroyukiS 14:32:41 regrets tomA, JanneS 14:32:56 f2f3 meeting record 14:33:18 DanC - copy of AndyS live editing from f2f3 not avail, is that OK? 14:34:07 AndyS to send notes to email, or point at them if already sent 14:34:36 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf3-brs + ammendment to come 14:34:43 RESOLVED 14:35:00 DONM 14:35:07 5 Oct, EricP to chair 14:35:19 JanneS scribe 14:35:47 possible regrets (moving next day) 14:35:51 Zakim, next agendum 14:35:51 agendum 2. "Introduction and abstract (name, marketing)" taken up [from DanC] 14:36:11 http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/DAWG-QL-name/results 14:37:22 +??P30 14:37:33 yes 14:37:45 (Yay, I got through on the phone!) 14:38:06 Zakim, ??P30 is SimonR 14:38:06 +SimonR; got it 14:38:18 DanC - propose to edit in SPARQL for now, but not close the issue 14:38:56 DaveB - and remove the other choices I hope 14:39:13 ACTION AndyS change name to SPARQL, keeping issue open in rq23 14:39:16 editor is inclined to accept the feedback in the direction of SPARQL 14:39:43 KendallC - words for abstract 14:39:51 that action DONE 14:40:14 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0557.html 14:40:15 +??P32 14:40:27 Zakim, ??P32 in JosD 14:40:27 I don't understand '??P32 in JosD', DanC 14:40:45 Zakim, next agendum 14:40:45 agendum 3. "issue: SOURCE" taken up [from DanC] 14:40:58 JosD has joined #dawg 14:41:49 -Kendall_Clark 14:42:35 +Kendall_Clark 14:43:05 re section9 of rq23 14:43:16 editors inclined to publish as is 14:43:29 ACTION DaveB: Update the source section 9, add 14:43:29 more formal links, update the examples, try to think about extra 14:43:29 constraints as EricP proposed (SOURCE ?s and ?s onlin in SELECT). Look 14:43:29 at various ppl's source test cases. 14:44:35 ACTION SteveH: test cases (10 or so) re: current SOURCE design. in progress 14:44:44 ACTION AlbertoR: real test cases re: current SOURCE design. in progress 14:44:55 zakim, mute me 14:44:55 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 14:45:10 * Yoshio ducked 14:45:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0541.html 14:45:40 zakim, unmute me 14:45:40 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 14:45:49 Andy's ACTION done http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0541.html 14:45:54 re 0541 helps JosD to distinguish 2 designs 14:46:58 AndyS re 0541 14:47:11 Q2 (2a) has 2 row results 14:47:52 in q2b there is no implicit distinct, no request for ?src, so get 1 result 14:48:33 Hmm, not feel natural with two lines 14:50:38 defns only http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/defns.html 14:52:45 discussion of duplicates in results, costs 14:52:58 and refernece to Query Solution that isn't clear if it's a set of (set of bindings) 14:53:36 PatH suggests being agnositic on duplicates, ref to systems that do resulting counting 14:54:46 distinct will always give 1 right answer 14:54:51 DISTINCT not in syntax yet 14:55:28 i've been thinking that limit might be a protocol bit 14:55:34 why so minmalistic? it would be hard to use with dupicates... at least unnatural... 14:56:17 yoshio, it has a cost on streaming 14:56:26 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0549.html 14:56:32 Can be useful to see that "Andy" occurs twice when projecting out in SELECT 14:56:43 alberto, tests based on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0327.html ? 14:56:50 yoshio, you end up with all of your results in a hash table that is consulted before each new tuple gets streamed 14:57:00 It also costs in terms of memory (need to keep track of previous things returned) 14:57:41 mmm, things are more complicated than I thought... but... 14:57:44 ericP: Actually, in order for us to do streaming joins we have to make sure our intermediate results have a sort ordering. So a side-effect of streaming for us is that distinct is actually fairly easy.... 14:58:16 continue alberto's action, ref to 0327 14:58:32 how about allowing duplicates only when streaming 14:59:31 Zakim, next agendum 14:59:31 agendum 4. "Toward 1st spec WD" taken up [from DanC] 15:00:11 action dirk continued 15:00:50 dont qnames have to have a :? 15:00:57 action AndyS DONE 15:01:25 SteveH: yeah. but in some n3's it is optional 15:02:07 DaveB, how is that qualified? 15:02:20 it would just be a URI wouldn't it? 15:02:48 AndyS hoping for draft by 1 Oct/Friday 15:02:52 hopeing? 15:03:15 yes - I *think* we can could drop the ?/$ but hard for some lexers (I'm told) 15:03:39 DaveB asks for 2 working days 15:04:01 AndyS: talked with DW right now (not on IRC either) - he will make his action later when he has time - then we can discuss more about ? vs. $ 15:04:12 fwiw, i find queries w/out var markers harder to read than ones with var markers. 15:04:15 And it looks all the same (qnames / variables) 15:04:35 ACTION HowardK: review updated spec (appearing 1 Oct) for 5th Oct 15:04:44 I do think the ?'s help visually, but I see Alberto's concerns 15:05:01 Zakim, next agendum 15:05:01 agendum 5. "Web Service Constraints etc." taken up [from DanC] 15:05:11 (other review actions SteveH, DaveB continued) 15:05:31 KendallC action DONE 15:05:43 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0553.html 15:05:56 * re: ? and $ what has become of the problem when bookmarking? 15:06:19 Yoshio: it makes little difference, you have to URI escape lots of characters anyway, for safety 15:06:48 DaveB: I see 15:06:52 DanC - would be nice to have a UC re rdf query and web service constraints 15:07:34 ACTION EricP: draft UC on overlap between RDF query and web service constraints 15:07:47 ... re WS-Policy 15:08:10 also see OWL-S, lots of other semantic web services work 15:08:47 possibly for a new UC draft 5th Oct 15:08:50 (UC&R) 15:09:09 Zakim, next agendum 15:09:09 agendum 6. "Toward updated Use Cases & Requirements WD" taken up [from DanC] 15:09:39 Yoshio: no is more about client side DBC API having problems dealing with '?' e.g. queries run through M$ Excel using an ODBC - you need wierd escaping of ? sings - Dirk will (hopefully) email more abou this later 15:09:46 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases $Revision: 1.42 $ of $Date: 2004/09/28 16:16:59 $ 15:09:54 KendallC has UC to add identity management, DI, above query/WS one, (danbri one) 15:09:59 action continued 15:10:18 SteveH continued 15:11:15 ACTION PatH: Review UC&R draft appearing around Oct1, for Oct5 telcon 15:12:26 Zakim, next agendum 15:12:26 agendum 7. "ftf meeting schedule" taken up [from DanC] 15:13:01 SteveH can host, haven't written the email 15:13:17 southampton offers to host 15:13:18 action done 15:13:22 if we're going to be cold, let's go all the way 15:13:34 Zakim, who's on the phone? 15:13:34 On the phone I see Yoshio, DaveB, DanC, HiroyuiS, AndyS, EricP, HowardK, SteveH, PatH, [ASemantics], SimonR, ??P32, Kendall_Clark 15:13:49 Cool : ) 15:14:09 Yoshio pref Helsinki 15:14:30 DaveB Southampton, then WDC 15:14:33 DanC no pref 15:14:51 Hiroyuki pref Helsinki 15:15:01 AndyS Southampton, Helsink, WDC that order 15:15:03 * can we see aurora there? 15:15:18 EricP Helsinki, Southampton, WDC (but pref Helsinki!) 15:15:27 HowardK WDC (if !Bush) else Helsinki 15:15:45 SteveH Southampton Helsinki WDC 15:15:55 PatH WDC Southampton Helsinki 15:16:03 Alberto Helsinki Southampton 15:16:21 SimonR WDC or others no pref 15:16:26 Kendall Helsinki 15:16:31 Zakim, ??P32 is JosD 15:16:31 +JosD; got it 15:16:32 JosD WDC 15:17:16 Helsinki would be regrets - JosD, PatH 15:17:53 it should be easy to eliminate 15:18:13 Richard Branson is arranging it. 15:18:19 heh 15:19:08 January 2005 15:19:08 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 15:19:09 1 15:19:11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15:19:13 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15:19:15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 15:19:17 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 15:19:19 30 31 15:21:19 PROPOSED: 19-20 January 2005 Espo, Finland hosted by Profium 15:21:41 RESOLVED F2F4 above 15:21:43 yay vodka! 15:21:56 and saunas 15:21:58 sauna too :) 15:22:13 and birch-leaved self-flagellation ^H^H^H^H oops :> 15:22:13 and hacheting holes in the ice so we can swim 15:24:24 wow 15:24:34 28 February - 4 March 2005 15:24:34 W3C Technical plenary (per W3C member events calendar) 15:24:47 ACTION EricP: find logistics re F2F5 at tech plenary in Boston March 28Feb-4Mar (2 days) 15:25:04 some pref to Mon/Tue for f2f5 15:25:23 +1 15:25:40 Zakim, close this agendum 15:25:40 agendum 7 closed 15:25:41 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 15:25:42 8. Issues [from DanC] 15:25:51 +1 to Mon/Tues 15:25:52 agenda? 15:26:28 Zakim, next agendum 15:26:28 agendum 8. "Issues" taken up [from DanC] 15:27:16 all item 8 actions state DONE/not done as in agenda 15:27:19 Zakim, next agendum 15:27:19 agendum 8 was just opened, DanC 15:27:35 item 9 15:27:48 kendallC walking tour action continued 15:27:59 kendallC deadline is F2F4 15:28:18 KendallC CC interface, attempt this week or next. continued 15:28:26 KendallC xml format - done 15:28:38 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0554.html 15:28:50 DaveB format done 15:28:59 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0556.html 15:29:07 EricP action done 15:29:36 KendalLC - working on protocol doc not complete yet 15:31:19 I'm really divided on the value of being validated by XML-Schema 15:31:25 or DTD 15:32:09 q? 15:32:13 q+ 15:32:28 q+ to ask if dave tried to shorhorm either into an RDF-compatible form 15:33:12 ack AlbertoR 15:33:19 q+ 15:33:30 q+ to ask about sparql var names fitting into xml names 15:33:35 more explanation needd - xslt, xpath - add an example 15:34:58 bnodes in results 15:35:02 issues with that 15:35:09 q+ to ask what means 15:35:18 PatH - does it allow future queries use that term? 15:35:44 ack ericp 15:35:44 ericP, you wanted to ask if dave tried to shorhorm either into an RDF-compatible form 15:35:52 kendall, I think means foo=NULL 15:36:12 yeah, I didn't actually form the data & queries, sorry 15:36:14 yeah 15:36:17 then how to encode foo="", steveH? 15:36:21 I needed something with datatypes 15:36:24 SteveH: How do you represent an empty plain literal, then? 15:36:24 not sure what i think about that 15:36:31 DanC - right 15:36:47 DanC, agreed, I was guessing, no saying I liked it 15:36:49 example with xml literal would be good, IMO 15:37:19 ah yeah; it'll be horribly entity encoded stuff 15:37:36 yep, but be good to show it, fwiw 15:37:46 DaveB syntax is cool - much flatter than orginal - just wanna be sure it has got all feature we need 15:38:03 I like result1.xml, modulo NULL too 15:38:36 ack andys 15:39:55 ack kendall 15:39:55 kendall, you wanted to ask about sparql var names fitting into xml names and to ask what means 15:40:31 explict it has no value, in xml syntax 15:40:43 ... is ok says AndyS 15:41:52 constraining variable names to fit in xml 15:42:01 ... matching xml name production or subset 15:42:15 AndyS in grammar, variable names are XML NCName 15:43:06 What about XML literals with same tag name? 15:43:10 PatH suggests introducing 'var ?x' 15:43:19 er, var x. then withdraws 15:43:27 I think he meant .. 15:44:17 q? 15:44:37 adv to schema with closed content model 15:44:49 q+ 15:44:52 could be in editing with schemas 15:45:02 Alberto - or generating records 15:45:03 q+ to ask what we said about XMLliterals 15:45:10 yes, easier to write this stuff by hand in smart xml editors w/ a schema 15:45:19 but i don't much much stock in that use case 15:45:38 ack danc 15:46:29 ack andy 15:46:29 AndyS, you wanted to ask what we said about XMLliterals 15:46:30 hmm, could have ... 15:47:07 hmm... xpath expression that accidently matches... 15:47:19 q+ 15:47:24 worst case could be getting back a query in the result 15:47:39 suggestion to use <[!CDATA, or whatever the syntax is 15:48:00 zakim, mute me 15:48:00 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:48:28 zakim, unmute me 15:48:28 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:49:18 zakim, mute me 15:49:18 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:50:28 zakim, unmute me 15:50:28 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:50:44 two results formats - var bindings, rdf graphs 15:50:52 the latter we have rdf/xml as rec format, also ntriples,... 15:51:01 +1 to returning RDF graphs as well as "XML for XML tools" 15:51:19 re the protocol design, KendallC has considered this two result formats. 15:51:33 DanC asks for examples of these cases 15:52:38 possibility of SELECT returning var binidngs (xml) and also returning a subgraph 15:52:48 ... in rdf/xml or whatever 15:54:11 DanC: the rdf graph result for variable bindings might either look like a) the query graph or b) an encoding of the variable bindings, like the test resutl format 15:54:18 thx 15:55:00 CONSTRUCT in the current doc present but not up-to-date linked with earlier sections 15:55:13 KendallC - third kind is the ASK result boolean 15:55:14 (I think we're already pretty high-risk, so I encourage you to go for it, AndyS) 15:55:36 :-) 15:55:41 q- I will take question about result1.xml on list later 15:55:49 q- 15:56:16 DaveB - need a format for ASK result without a protocol 15:56:38 regrets next week from JosD 15:56:46 ADJOURN. 15:56:51 -DaveB 15:56:53 -[ASemantics] 15:56:54 -PatH 15:56:55 -JosD 15:56:58 bye 15:57:00 -SimonR 15:57:01 -SteveH 15:57:03 -DanC 15:57:04 -HiroyuiS 15:57:05 -Kendall_Clark 15:57:06 -HowardK 15:57:07 -Yoshio 15:57:24 AlbertoR has left #dawg 15:57:35 bye 15:57:40 hm.... ASK result format: vs. . 1/2 ;-) 15:58:20 :) 15:58:33 +1 (=true) 15:58:43 how about +1, -1 or 0 (dunno) 15:59:27 IIRC OWL tests had a single char answer for something 16:07:03 Zakim, who is on the phone? 16:07:03 On the phone I see AndyS, EricP 16:07:15 See http://www.w3.org/2004/09/28-dawg-irc#T16-07-03-1 16:14:59 -AndyS 16:15:00 -EricP 16:15:01 SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended 16:15:02 Attendees were Yoshio, DaveB, Kendall_Clark, DanC, AndyS, HiroyuiS, EricP, HowardK, SteveH, PatH, [ASemantics], SimonR, JosD