IRC log of swbp on 2004-09-16
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 17:57:04 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #swbp
- 17:57:16 [Ralph]
- Meeting: SemWeb Best Practices and Deployment WG
- 17:57:28 [Ralph]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0047.html
- 17:57:32 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD()2:00PM has now started
- 17:57:40 [Zakim]
- +Guus_Schreiber
- 17:57:45 [Ralph]
- Chair: Guus
- 17:57:58 [Ralph]
- Previous: 2004-09-02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0067.html
- 17:58:35 [Zakim]
- +??P5
- 17:58:50 [Zakim]
- +Andreas_Harth (was ??P5)
- 17:59:36 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 18:00:02 [guus]
- guus has joined #swbp
- 18:00:18 [Zakim]
- +[Tucana]
- 18:00:24 [TomAdams]
- zakim, Tucana is TomAdams
- 18:00:24 [Zakim]
- +TomAdams; got it
- 18:00:25 [Tbaker]
- Tbaker has joined #swbp
- 18:00:32 [Zakim]
- + +49.308.1.aaaa
- 18:00:32 [Zakim]
- +Evan_Wallace
- 18:00:48 [Zakim]
- +Tom_Baker (was +49.308.1.aaaa)
- 18:01:20 [Fabien]
- Fabien has joined #swbp
- 18:02:10 [aharth]
- aharth has joined #swbp
- 18:02:22 [aharth]
- Zakim, help
- 18:02:22 [Zakim]
- Please refer to http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot for more detailed help.
- 18:02:24 [Zakim]
- Some of the commands I know are:
- 18:02:25 [Zakim]
- xxx is yyy - establish yyy as the name of unknown party xxx
- 18:02:27 [Zakim]
- if yyy is 'me' or 'I', your nick is substituted
- 18:02:29 [Zakim]
- xxx may be yyy - establish yyy as possibly the name of unknown party xxx
- 18:02:31 [Zakim]
- I am xxx - establish your nick as the name of unknown party xxx
- 18:02:33 [Zakim]
- xxx holds yyy [, zzz ...] - establish xxx as a group name and yyy, etc. as participants within that group
- 18:02:35 [Zakim]
- xxx also holds yyy - add yyy to the list of participants in group xxx
- 18:02:37 [Zakim]
- who's here? - lists the participants on the phone
- 18:02:39 [Zakim]
- who's muted? - lists the participants who are muted
- 18:02:41 [Zakim]
- mute xxx - mutes party xxx (like pressing 61#)
- 18:02:43 [Zakim]
- unmute xxx - reverses the effect of "mute" and of 61#
- 18:02:45 [Zakim]
- is xxx here? - reports whether a party named like xxx is present
- 18:02:47 [Zakim]
- list conferences - reports the active conferences
- 18:02:48 [Zakim]
- this is xxx - associates this channel with conference xxx
- 18:02:49 [Zakim]
- excuse us - disconnects from the irc channel
- 18:02:50 [Zakim]
- I last learned something new on $Date: 2004/08/19 13:48:08 $
- 18:02:51 [Zakim]
- +[Sophia]
- 18:02:56 [Fabien]
- zakim, [Sophia] is Fabien
- 18:02:56 [Zakim]
- +Fabien; got it
- 18:03:58 [Ralph]
- Regrets: Natasha, Brian, Jos, Alistair, Deb, David, Gary, Libby, Jeremy
- 18:04:08 [guus]
- zakim, who is here?
- 18:04:08 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Guus_Schreiber, Andreas_Harth, Ralph, TomAdams, Tom_Baker, Evan_Wallace, Fabien (muted)
- 18:04:10 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see aharth, Fabien, Tbaker, guus, RRSAgent, Zakim, Ralph, TomAdams
- 18:05:05 [Ralph]
- Scribe: Ralph
- 18:05:14 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:05:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Administrivia" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:05:47 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED: accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0067.html as record of previous meeting
- 18:06:10 [Ralph]
- so RESOLVED
- 18:06:31 [Ralph]
- PROPOSED next telecon 30 Sep 1400 UTC
- 18:06:48 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Guus send e-mail about telecon attendance, as it's getting low
- 18:06:59 [Ralph]
- TomA: regrets for 30 Sep
- 18:08:04 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ralph post his attendance analysis ('good standing' record) to the list
- 18:08:27 [Ralph]
- RESOLVED next telecon 30 Sep 1400 UTC
- 18:09:10 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Guus send email to Brian and Jeremy to create a local information page for FtF
- 18:09:21 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Ralph create a WBS registration page for the FtF
- 18:09:51 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:09:51 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "Action Item Review" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:09:56 [Ralph]
- ACTION David Contact Ben in regard to coordinating RDF in XHTML TF
- 18:10:03 [Ralph]
- completed
- 18:10:14 [Ralph]
- ACTION Gary look at DAWG's request and post comments to mailing list
- 18:10:18 [Ralph]
- completed
- 18:10:31 [Ralph]
- ACTION Jeremy to review XSD FNO and SCD documents.
- 18:10:37 [Ralph]
- continue
- 18:10:40 [Ralph]
- ACTION Jeremy to add XSD FNO and SCD documents to TF reference list.
- 18:10:41 [Ralph]
- continue
- 18:10:45 [Ralph]
- ACTION Jeremy to check semantics on DAWG use of XSD in abstract query model.
- 18:11:00 [Ralph]
- ACTION Guus: ping Jeremy about XSD actions
- 18:11:13 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:11:13 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "Community Feedback" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:11:20 [BenBooth]
- BenBooth has joined #swbp
- 18:11:38 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0043.html SWBP Community Feedback [David 2004-09-13]
- 18:11:56 [Ralph]
- Guus: David distilled some comments from (outside) meetings he recently attended
- 18:12:34 [Ralph]
- Evan: partOf was on our list of patterns at one time
- 18:12:40 [Zakim]
- +[webMethods]
- 18:13:29 [Ralph]
- Guus: yes, Chris Welty wanted to do partOf, though perhaps to a greater detail than is suggested by David's item 2
- 18:13:53 [Ralph]
- ... I would like OEP to take this up
- 18:13:58 [Ralph]
- Evan: agree
- 18:14:33 [BenBooth]
- yes - Ben here
- 18:14:53 [TomAdams]
- This was one of the conferences Dave was making comments after: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/09/15/egov.html
- 18:14:59 [Ralph]
- zakim, [webMethods] is Ben_Booth
- 18:14:59 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Booth; got it
- 18:15:49 [BenBooth]
- Second actually - but may as well be the first.
- 18:16:12 [Ralph]
- Guus: doing something more concrete for lat/lon might be welcomed
- 18:18:03 [Ralph]
- Ralph: might also be done in APP TF if there is something existing that we could simply cite
- 18:18:20 [Ralph]
- Evan: thought we talked about this and decided not to go that route specifically for units & measures
- 18:19:08 [Ralph]
- Evan: point 4 from David's mail sounds like exactly where examples are what's needed
- 18:19:50 [Ralph]
- Guus: Usability is another request for more examples
- 18:20:46 [Ralph]
- Evan: what does the 'geeky' comment mean?
- 18:22:17 [Ralph]
- Ralph: my sense was that this was a request for more basic materials; the problems addressed by our current notes are perhaps things that new adoptees of RDF&OWL are not yet facing
- 18:22:53 [Ralph]
- Guus: I also hear community feedback requesting help on linking metdata to multimedia
- 18:24:06 [Ralph]
- Ralph, TomA: tutorial page can serve to cite basic how-to materials also
- 18:24:21 [Ralph]
- TomA: also talked with some folk putting satellite data into RDF
- 18:25:11 [Ralph]
- ... they might be a source for more information and examples
- 18:25:18 [Ralph]
- ... particularly for non-textual metadata
- 18:25:28 [Ralph]
- ... may be a generic use case
- 18:26:33 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:26:33 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "Web Architecture Draft" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:27:09 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0037.html Comments to Web Arch WD due 17 Sep [David 2004-09-10]
- 18:30:41 [Ralph]
- Ralph: perhaps Pat or Jos would like to craft a WG comment
- 18:30:51 [Ralph]
- ACTION: Guus contact Pat and Jos about Web Arch comments
- 18:30:55 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:30:55 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "ODM/UML Ontology Profile" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:31:39 [Ralph]
- [Ralph: as the Web Arch comment deadline is tomorrow, the polite way to proceed if we were to ask for an extension is to send mail before the deadline saying we expect to comment soon]
- 18:32:20 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0044.html more on the status of the OMG ontology specification [Evan 2004-09-13]
- 18:32:40 [Ralph]
- Evan: the document that several e-mails have cited is a combined set of comments on the UML draft
- 18:33:12 [Ralph]
- ... no mapping has actually been produced yet
- 18:33:37 [Ralph]
- ... at least 3 submitter groups are working on mappings; "MOF Query Views and Transformations"
- 18:34:44 [Ralph]
- ... next OMG meeting is in November [same week as our FtF]; would be useful to have input from SWBP
- 18:35:58 [Ralph]
- Guus: I want to study ODM in more depth, but my impression is that it would be useful for SWBP to comment on it
- 18:37:14 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Booth
- 18:37:18 [Ralph]
- Evan: it may be that this group's concern might be more in the mappings but we should look at the metamodel too
- 18:37:54 [Ralph]
- Guus: I am willing to be one reviewer
- 18:38:11 [BenBooth]
- I would be willing to assist (UML experience)
- 18:38:13 [Ralph]
- ACTION Guus: ask the WG for a second reviewer for ODM
- 18:38:22 [Ralph]
- thanks, Ben
- 18:38:43 [Ralph]
- Guus: Ben's offer accepted
- 18:38:58 [Ralph]
- Evan: ask Gary Ng too
- 18:39:45 [Ralph]
- Evan: I looked over the models in June and was quite happy with them
- 18:39:45 [Zakim]
- +[webMethods]
- 18:40:13 [Ralph]
- zakim, [webMethods] is Ben_Booth
- 18:40:13 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Booth; got it
- 18:40:24 [Ralph]
- BenB: happy to work with someone in an assistance role
- 18:41:17 [Ralph]
- ACTION: BenB read ODM documents
- 18:41:40 [Ralph]
- [Ralph notes the nice symmetry between Tom[AB] and Ben[AB]
- 18:41:51 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:41:51 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "RDF/TopicMaps" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:42:05 [Ralph]
- Guus: it would be nice to start this work in the next month
- 18:42:12 [Ralph]
- zakim, close this agendum
- 18:42:12 [Zakim]
- agendum 6 closed
- 18:42:13 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 18:42:14 [Zakim]
- 7. TF Updates [from Ralph]
- 18:42:14 [Ralph]
- zakim, next agendum
- 18:42:14 [Zakim]
- agendum 7. "TF Updates" taken up [from Ralph]
- 18:42:25 [Ralph]
- Topic: OEP
- 18:42:31 [Ralph]
- [no one present]
- 18:42:36 [Ralph]
- Topic: Port
- 18:42:51 [Ralph]
- Guus: comments requested on Alistair's update
- 18:43:11 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0041.html [PORT] ftf goals [Alistair 2004-09-13]
- 18:43:30 [Ralph]
- Tpic: WordNet
- 18:43:34 [Ralph]
- [Aldo not present]
- 18:43:47 [Ralph]
- Topic: Vocab Management
- 18:44:30 [Ralph]
- TomB: telecon scheduled for tomorrow, 17-Sep 1400 UTC
- 18:44:51 [Ralph]
- ... sent a questionnaire to TF; need more responses
- 18:45:24 [Ralph]
- ... have been concerned about the scope of the TF; don't want to take on more than we can accomplish
- 18:45:57 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0006.html [VM] Scoping Draft with questions to TF members [TomB 2004-09-02]
- 18:46:22 [Ralph]
- TomB: I would like to recommend using Dublin Core practice to focus discussion
- 18:46:46 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Booth
- 18:46:54 [Ralph]
- ... e.g. Andy Powell just posted [to Dublin Core] a set of guidelines for assigning identifiers
- 18:47:02 [Tbaker]
- http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/term-identifier-guidelines/
- 18:47:19 [Ralph]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0060.html [VM] Guidelines for assigning identifiers to terms [TomB 2004-09-16]
- 18:47:22 [Zakim]
- +[webMethods]
- 18:47:37 [Ralph]
- TomB: Andy Powell's document covers many of the issues I'd like the VM TF to address
- 18:47:55 [Ralph]
- zakim, webMethods is Ben_Booth
- 18:47:55 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Booth; got it
- 18:48:37 [Ralph]
- TomB: I'm concerned about the size of the task and the current volume of the [TF] response
- 18:51:16 [Ralph]
- Guus: the chairs' guide, The Art of Consensus, turns out not to be a 'document' but a page with lots of links. This turns out to be very useful and a model that could be emulated.
- 18:51:56 [Ralph]
- TomB: having something recognized in a Best Practice note from W3C would be useful
- 18:52:42 [Ralph]
- ... for example, the Dublin Core namespace policy is very accessible and could be endorsed by SWBPD
- 18:52:53 [Ralph]
- ... I want to break out topics that the WG could own
- 18:54:15 [Ralph]
- ... selecting a range of practices, describing those practices w/advantages and disadvantages
- 18:55:40 [Ralph]
- Guus: I agree with Tom's approach -- focus on things that are out there
- 18:57:18 [Ralph]
- TomB: my approach was to break out a few topics for the TF members to comment on
- 18:57:32 [Ralph]
- ... my bias is to write short things that are understandable by non-experts
- 18:57:44 [Ralph]
- ... need some commitment from the TF participants
- 18:58:24 [Ralph]
- ... may reduce the scope even more in order to get comments from the TF
- 19:00:53 [Ralph]
- Ralph: good to use the issues identified by deployment groups such as Dublin Core to drive our priorities
- 19:01:56 [Ralph]
- Guus: nudge people on the list to provide feedback
- 19:03:59 [Ralph]
- ACTION TomB: nudge VM TF participants to provide feedback
- 19:04:25 [Ralph]
- Topic: HTML TF
- 19:08:59 [TomAdams]
- s/Guilt/Guilty
- 19:09:19 [Tbaker]
- Tom clarifies for the record that "endorsement" of things like DCMI Namespace Policy is not sought - rather recognition as one instance of good practice
- 19:12:08 [Ralph]
- ACTION Ralph: ask WG for feedback on requirement to embed RDF/XML markup in an XHTML document
- 19:12:41 [Ralph]
- [Ralph summarized Tuesday 7-Sep HTML TF telecon]
- 19:12:44 [TomAdams]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2004Sep/0071.html
- 19:12:53 [Ralph]
- Topic: Tutorial Page
- 19:13:13 [Ralph]
- TomA: received some suggested additions [0071.html]
- 19:13:29 [Ralph]
- ... we had agreed to use www-archive
- 19:14:09 [Ralph]
- ... is it bad form to repost something sent privately to me to that archive?
- 19:14:23 [Ralph]
- Ralph: yes, bad form; better to ask the sender to repost
- 19:14:32 [Ralph]
- Topic: ADTF
- 19:14:34 [Fabien]
- The blog on applications and demos is slowly growing:
- 19:14:36 [Fabien]
- http://esw.w3.org/mt/esw/archives/cat_applications_and_demos.html
- 19:14:36 [Ralph]
- [no representative present]
- 19:16:58 [Ralph]
- Guus: Task Forces should be able to use the Thursday WG telecon slot [on alternate weeks]
- 19:18:02 [Ralph]
- adjourned
- 19:18:05 [Zakim]
- -Evan_Wallace
- 19:18:06 [Zakim]
- -TomAdams
- 19:18:07 [Zakim]
- -Tom_Baker
- 19:18:09 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Booth
- 19:18:10 [Zakim]
- -Andreas_Harth
- 19:18:10 [Zakim]
- -Fabien
- 19:18:11 [Zakim]
- -Guus_Schreiber
- 19:18:15 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 19:18:27 [Zakim]
- SW_BPD()2:00PM has ended
- 19:18:28 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Guus_Schreiber, Andreas_Harth, Ralph, [Tucana], TomAdams, Evan_Wallace, Tom_Baker, Fabien, Ben_Booth, [webMethods]
- 19:18:36 [Ralph]
- rrsagent, bye
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- I see 10 open action items:
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus send e-mail about telecon attendance, as it's getting low [1]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-06-48
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph post his attendance analysis ('good standing' record) to the list [2]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-08-04
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus send email to Brian and Jeremy to create a local information page for FtF [3]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-09-10
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph create a WBS registration page for the FtF [4]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-09-21
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus to ping Jeremy about XSD actions [5]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-11-00
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus contact Pat and Jos about Web Arch comments [6]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-30-51
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Guus to ask the WG for a second reviewer for ODM [7]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-38-13
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: BenB read ODM documents [8]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T18-41-17
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: TomB to nudge VM TF participants to provide feedback [9]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T19-03-59
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to ask WG for feedback on requirement to embed RDF/XML markup in an XHTML document [10]
- 19:18:36 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/09/16-swbp-irc#T19-12-08