14:31:57 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 14:31:58 On IRC I see DanC_jam, TomAdams, Zakim, rob, kendall, Yoshio, DaveB, howardk, KevinW, SimonR, AndyS, AndyS_logger, ericP 14:31:58 +HowardK 14:32:11 +Tayeb|JeffB 14:32:36 alberto has joined #dawg 14:33:09 SteveH has joined #dawg 14:34:16 + +39.063.7.aaaa 14:34:31 zakim, ??P31 is TomAdams 14:34:31 +TomAdams; got it 14:34:32 The URI of my TriQL evaluation is http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-Yoshio/TriQLevaluation.html 14:34:41 zakim, +39.063.7.aaaa is Alberto 14:34:41 +Alberto; got it 14:34:58 zakim, who is here? 14:34:58 On the phone I see Yoshio, Kendall_Clark, Kevin, EricP, Natasha, RobS, AndyS, DavidWood, TomAdams, HowardK, TayebJeffB, Alberto 14:35:00 On IRC I see SteveH, alberto, RRSAgent, DanC_jam, TomAdams, Zakim, rob, kendall, Yoshio, DaveB, howardk, KevinW, SimonR, AndyS, AndyS_logger, ericP 14:35:44 +??P35 14:35:51 Zakim, ??P35 is DaveB 14:35:51 +DaveB; got it 14:35:52 +JosD 14:36:06 JosD has joined #dawg 14:36:17 +Farrukh 14:36:52 +[UMD] 14:37:29 jhendler has joined #dawg 14:37:32 who is the scribe? 14:37:40 I am 14:37:41 + +1.603.837.aabb 14:37:42 zakim, [umd] is jimH 14:37:42 +jimH; got it 14:37:51 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0779.html 14:37:58 agenda item 1: 14:38:27 Zakim, list attendees 14:38:27 As of this point the attendees have been Yoshio, Kendall_Clark, Kevin, EricP, Natasha, RobS, AndyS, DavidWood, HowardK, Tayeb|JeffB, TomAdams, Alberto, DaveB, JosD, Farrukh, 14:38:27 zakim who is here 14:38:30 ... +1.603.837.aabb, jimH, DanC 14:38:49 jfbaget has joined #dawg 14:38:58 FarrukhNajmi has joined #dawg 14:39:06 Minutes approved 14:39:38 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/DesignEvaluations 14:39:42 Scribe next time (6 July): SimonR 14:40:00 -- I moved the design evals page to a web doc 14:40:10 Action/kendall done (remove 3.6 variant) 14:40:24 Item 2: F2F update 14:40:45 Agenda in progress 14:41:05 Phone set up not finalized but looking OK 14:41:57 F2F end 14:42:02 Rob, can you get the phone number for us? 14:42:12 Item 3: requirement 3.6 optional match 14:43:07 alberto: sure 14:43:49 SimonR: use case of people with people and properties 14:44:17 lol 14:44:23 Tom: current subquery mechanism not enough 14:44:31 WE ARE ALL TUCANA, suddenly :> 14:44:32 Commercial need 14:45:04 Jim+Bjian finds needed for UDDI/service match (e.g. contract number if present) 14:45:20 UC For UDDI -> JimH offers after F2F 14:45:30 same here - optional matches is very important requirement for us and our customers too 14:45:48 Farrukh offers ebXML registry UC 14:46:23 ACTION Farrukh write up ebXML registry UC 14:46:45 ACTION: JimH to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case 14:46:48 ACTION Jimh, write UC For UDDI (after F2F) 14:47:16 ACTION: Farrukh write up ebXML registry UC 14:47:27 rssagent, list actions 14:48:25 This is one of the most common requests we get. 14:48:43 outer join? I don't have a database 14:48:59 Simon wants req but not outer joins please 14:49:01 +1 daveb 14:49:24 Simon: See Date Ch 19 14:49:46 sometimes when a property (or graph branch) is optional the query hand-writer (user/developer) might not know how it is structured - so have some kind of '*' (wildcard) might be useful - it is never practical to spell out all the bnodes/properties for optionals 14:50:44 Jim, get in touch with me if you need a hand with UDDI use case, we have a customer that is interested in this, who I can get requirements from. 14:50:50 +1 AndyS - semi-structure data is a big application area for RDF we think 14:51:45 s/semi-structure/semi-structured/ 14:52:50 EricP: implementation experience in Algae2 14:53:15 Rob: Sceptical as to be a requirement 14:53:58 C.J. Date, Introduction to Database Systems, Chapter 19, Missing Information, ISBN: 0-321-19784-4 http://www.aw-bc.com/catalog/academic/product/0,4096,0321197844,00.html 14:54:32 JimH: asks if it is hard 14:54:41 RobS: Algae optional join code snipet: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0597.html 14:55:05 S. Abiteboul "Querying Semi-Structured Data" 1997 http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/abiteboul97querying.html 14:55:32 Rob: unbound / nulls are a big thing 14:55:57 q+ to discuss how Parka-DB did optional joins 14:56:48 BRQL does it as nested queries but can optimize to outer joins as the result is flattened 14:57:14 kendall - will do 14:57:19 andys: thx 14:58:59 Rob: but is it a requirement? What about a objective? 14:59:00 +1 14:59:22 Objective-ization: Jos, Rob 14:59:24 +1 for requirement... sorry 14:59:32 ack jhendler 14:59:32 jhendler, you wanted to discuss how Parka-DB did optional joins 15:00:08 ok to skip you, jim? 15:00:29 +1 for simon to write about the *other* solutions 15:00:44 ACTION: SimonR, advocate this requirememtn 15:00:59 s/requirememtn/requirement/ 15:01:43 Simon, we'll head over the the bookshop and pick up a copy. I left mine in Oz. 15:01:53 Item 4: Streaming 15:02:11 Rob: Possibility against 15:02:49 zakim, mute me 15:02:49 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:03:18 Rob: wording is client driven and it is a server feature 15:03:33 zakim, unmute me 15:03:33 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:04:05 DanC: Web does use progressive display 15:05:09 lots of otherwise lazy web designers use img elements wiht vsize and hsize 15:05:27 q+ 15:05:41 seconded Tom 15:05:49 Abstain rob 15:06:15 is there some interaction between streaming and result limit? 15:06:19 RESOLVED to accept "streamability" with one abstain 15:06:27 Item 5: testing 15:06:38 Steve's action done 15:06:49 SteveH? 15:06:53 (Steve - partial regrets) 15:07:16 yes, i believe its done 15:07:27 DanC: Please Steve catch test cases as it goes 15:07:48 Should move to W3C web site sometime 15:07:57 Item 6: Design evals and poll 15:08:07 DaveB did action on Algae 15:08:12 EricP responded 15:08:47 Issues: subgraph results ?? 15:09:00 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/DesignEvaluations 15:09:16 -RobS 15:09:27 Kendall has consolidated - keep in F2F reading as primary copy 15:09:53 got cut off; redialiing 15:10:34 ACTION: Kendall, edit to remove in-the-face URLs 15:10:48 ACTION: Kendall, make a table in the doc 15:11:09 Howard emailed XsRQL 15:11:16 +RobS 15:11:55 ACTION: AndyS, Evaluation of XsRQL for next Tuesday 15:12:11 ACTION: Howard, send AndyS a draft main requirements 15:12:33 DanC: No surprises at F2F => strawpoll before hand 15:12:46 DanC: I've answered the poll 15:12:59 it's at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/ 15:13:15 daveb: txs 15:13:28 UnAction: Pause Kendall to do a summary table 15:13:52 Howard: Q about F2F process 15:14:05 zakim, mute me 15:14:05 Kendall_Clark should now be muted 15:14:24 DanC: Need more data before decision on structure 15:14:36 q+ 15:14:46 q+ 15:14:47 andys: have i missed an eval of brql? 15:15:17 DanC: If we miss the F2F we slip schedule but may be necessary 15:15:31 Kendall - its in the BRQL.html doc 15:15:38 And ref'ed in email I sent 15:16:14 zakim, unmute me 15:16:14 Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted 15:16:16 Poll answers can be revised - end is currently 5 July 15:16:21 +q to ask question about poll 15:16:31 q+ to ask question about poll 15:16:49 Jos: is there code for each of the systems? 15:17:43 XsRQL : path language mainly impl'ed , not triple constructors 15:17:55 q 15:17:56 BRQL prototype 15:18:00 q? 15:19:19 q- 15:19:55 Is there a query language comparison matrix that we should develope? 15:20:02 Kendall: How can we have a rank of protocol and QL? 15:20:08 it's more, which one woudl you most like to start with? 15:20:26 Farr: I think that's sorta what I'm gonna do with the table, eventually 15:20:52 DanC: Path is not new language from clean sheet - instead pick one and refine by an issues driven process 15:21:18 "Borrow" other design features 15:22:10 Kendall: Remove Joseki from list 15:22:20 DanC: Two votes - protocol and QLs 15:22:38 SimonR: BEEP in theory 15:23:02 BEEP in prototype :) 15:23:31 DanC: Does Alberto want asemantics variant removed? Yes 15:24:25 AOB? 15:24:42 JimH: Public comments - who manages the process? 15:25:20 JimH: e.g. Graham Klyne comments 15:25:34 Editor responsibility at the moment 15:26:30 RDQL++ = BRQL almost - I will post short comments about BRQL to the list later 15:26:34 JimH: Should be responsive - are we really listening to comments? 15:27:05 Jimh: Useful to manage the comments and see where there is a match 15:28:01 massimo's comments start http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2004Jun/0010.html 15:28:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:28:49 RRSAgent, make logs world-access 15:29:02 ACTION: DanC, restructure poll 15:29:19 Meeting ends 15:29:22 -Natasha 15:29:22 bye 15:29:23 -JosD 15:29:24 -RobS 15:29:25 -TomAdams 15:29:26 -Alberto 15:29:26 KevinW has left #dawg 15:29:27 -DaveB 15:29:28 -DanC 15:29:29 -TayebJeffB 15:29:30 -jimH 15:29:31 -HowardK 15:29:34 -Kendall_Clark 15:29:35 -Kevin 15:29:36 bye 15:29:37 -Yoshio 15:29:40 TomAdams has left #dawg 15:29:46 -Farrukh 15:29:55 bye 15:29:57 FarrukhNajmi has left #dawg 15:30:03 Yoshio has left #dawg 15:33:40 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/perl/modules/W3C/Rdf/test/Optional2-alg.sh?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup 15:33:42 -DavidWood 15:38:27 rssagent, list actions 15:38:46 rssagent, show actions 15:40:00 rssagent, show action items 15:40:16 rrssagent? 15:40:24 rrsagent, show action items 15:40:24 I see 8 open action items: 15:40:24 ACTION: JimH to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case [1] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T14-46-45 15:40:24 ACTION: Farrukh write up ebXML registry UC [2] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T14-47-16 15:40:24 ACTION: SimonR, advocate this requirememtn [3] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T15-00-44 15:40:24 ACTION: Kendall, edit to remove in-the-face URLs [4] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T15-10-34 15:40:24 ACTION: Kendall, make a table in the doc [5] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T15-10-48 15:40:24 ACTION: AndyS, Evaluation of XsRQL for next Tuesday [6] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T15-11-55 15:40:24 ACTION: Howard, send AndyS a draft main requirements [7] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T15-12-11 15:40:24 ACTION: DanC, restructure poll [8] 15:40:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/06/29-dawg-irc#T15-29-02 15:57:47 SteveH has left #dawg 15:58:01 http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/BRQL/ 16:06:07 http://jena.sourceforge.net/javadoc/jena/rdfcompare.html 16:07:26 -AndyS 16:12:34 -EricP 16:12:35 SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended 16:12:36 Attendees were Yoshio, Kendall_Clark, Kevin, EricP, Natasha, RobS, AndyS, DavidWood, HowardK, Tayeb|JeffB, TomAdams, Alberto, DaveB, JosD, Farrukh, +1.603.837.aabb, jimH, DanC 19:00:23 Zakim has left #dawg