IRC log of dawg on 2004-06-15

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:30:30 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #dawg
14:30:31 [Zakim]
14:30:37 [DanC]
agenda + Convene, take roll, review record, agenda
14:30:38 [ericP]
zakim, who is here?
14:30:41 [Zakim]
On the phone I see +1.781.942.aaaa, Kevin, NickG, Yoshio, ??P5, EricP
14:30:51 [Zakim]
On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, ericP, JanneS, DanC, alberto, KevinW, SteveH, AndyS, DaveB, Yoshio, FarrukhNajmi, SimonR
14:30:52 [FarrukhNajmi]
14:30:53 [DanC]
agenda + ftf update
14:31:00 [Zakim]
+ +1.703.871.aabb
14:31:02 [DanC]
agenda + Use Cases and Requirements Doc
14:31:06 [Zakim]
14:31:16 [DanC]
agenda + Review test materials
14:31:19 [SteveH]
I think I'm masqarading as NickG
14:31:20 [rob_]
rob_ has joined #dawg
14:31:25 [DanC]
agenda + Requirements
14:31:30 [Zakim]
14:31:30 [ericP]
zaiim, ??P7 is Tom
14:31:34 [Zakim]
14:31:38 [DanC]
agenda -4
14:31:39 [DanC]
agenda -5
14:31:49 [AndyS]
zakim, ??P8 is AndyS
14:31:49 [Zakim]
14:31:50 [Zakim]
+AndyS; got it
14:31:52 [SteveH]
Zakim, NickG is SteveH
14:31:52 [Zakim]
+SteveH; got it
14:31:52 [ericP]
zakim, ??P8 is andy
14:31:53 [Zakim]
I already had ??P8 as AndyS, ericP
14:32:08 [tom]
tom has joined #dawg
14:32:10 [kendall]
kendall has joined #dawg
14:32:11 [DanC]
agenda + Review test materials
14:32:17 [ericP]
zakim, who is here?
14:32:17 [Zakim]
On the phone I see +1.781.942.aaaa, Kevin, SteveH, Yoshio, ??P5, EricP, +1.703.871.aabb, ??P7, AndyS, RobS, [ASemantics]
14:32:19 [Zakim]
On IRC I see kendall, tom, rob_, RRSAgent, Zakim, ericP, JanneS, DanC, alberto, KevinW, SteveH, AndyS, DaveB, Yoshio, FarrukhNajmi, SimonR
14:32:26 [DanC]
agenda -4
14:32:35 [DanC]
agenda + Requirements
14:32:39 [Zakim]
+ +1.714.539.aacc
14:32:42 [Zakim]
14:32:48 [Zakim]
14:32:58 [JosD]
JosD has joined #dawg
14:33:03 [ericP]
zakim, 1.781.942.aaaa is farrukh
14:33:04 [Zakim]
sorry, ericP, I do not recognize a party named '1.781.942.aaaa'
14:33:06 [Zakim]
14:33:08 [Zakim]
14:33:12 [Zakim]
14:33:38 [JosD]
Zakim, ??P13 is JosD
14:33:38 [Zakim]
+JosD; got it
14:33:45 [ericP]
tx Jos
14:34:27 [FarrukhNajmi]
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda
14:34:46 [DanC]
Zakim, take up agendum 1
14:34:46 [Zakim]
agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review record, agenda" taken up [from DanC]
14:35:39 [Zakim]
14:36:05 [DanC]
Dirk Colaert
14:37:11 [ericP]
U Maryland: Kendall, Jim
14:37:17 [ericP]
Panosonic: Yohsio
14:37:20 [kendall]
zakim, mute me
14:37:20 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should now be muted
14:37:20 [ericP]
Net inf: Rob
14:37:26 [FarrukhNajmi]
JoshD, Dirk, Albert, AndyS, KevinW, Kendal, JimH, Yoshio, RobS, Farrukh
14:37:31 [ericP]
14:37:47 [ericP]
Tom Adams
14:38:02 [ericP]
14:38:06 [ericP]
Steve Harris
14:38:10 [FarrukhNajmi]
Thx. Eric
14:38:11 [ericP]
-Pat Hayes
14:38:14 [ericP]
14:38:21 [ericP]
-Howard (excused)
14:38:26 [DanC]
14:38:31 [ericP]
14:38:40 [ericP]
W3C: DanC, EricP
14:39:13 [FarrukhNajmi]
Accepted Minutes of RDF DAWG telecon Tuesday 2004-06-08 for review
14:39:13 [FarrukhNajmi]
14:39:13 [FarrukhNajmi]
as ammended Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:14:00 -0500 by Connolly
14:39:33 [DanC]
Zakim, agenda?
14:39:33 [Zakim]
I see 5 items remaining on the agenda:
14:39:34 [Zakim]
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda [from DanC]
14:39:37 [Zakim]
2. ftf update [from DanC]
14:39:38 [Zakim]
3. Use Cases and Requirements Doc [from DanC]
14:39:39 [Zakim]
4. Review test materials [from DanC]
14:39:40 [Zakim]
5. Requirements [from DanC]
14:40:28 [FarrukhNajmi]
Dan: Any additional agenda items?
14:40:33 [DanC]
Zakim, next agendum
14:40:33 [Zakim]
agendum 2. "ftf update" taken up [from DanC]
14:40:44 [FarrukhNajmi]
Ken: Need to review additional new use cases
14:41:14 [FarrukhNajmi]
?: Have a new registration form mechanism
14:41:34 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: 7 people have replied so far
14:41:41 [kendall]
paste the registration doodad into IRC?
14:41:47 [kendall]
uri, i mean
14:41:50 [Yoshio]
I have a credibility problem
14:42:02 [Yoshio]
EricP knows
14:42:07 [ericP]
14:42:07 [FarrukhNajmi]
2. ftf update
14:42:07 [FarrukhNajmi]
ALL F2F2 registration at
14:42:23 [DanC]
Zakim, next agendum
14:42:23 [Zakim]
agendum 3. "Use Cases and Requirements Doc" taken up [from DanC]
14:42:37 [DanC]
DONE: ACTION EricP to send announcement of UC&R to rdfs-rules list
14:42:51 [kendall]
zakim, unmute me
14:42:51 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
14:42:56 [DaveB]
I claim my action done
14:43:08 [DanC]
ACTION: Kendall: consider the larger comments from Brian and Yoshio post-publication
14:43:11 [DanC]
14:43:23 [ericP]
zakim, who is speaking?
14:43:34 [Zakim]
ericP, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: +1.781.942.aaaa (66%), RobS (4%), JimH (23%), DanC (94%)
14:43:55 [DanC]
DONE ACTION Kendall to dispose of "3.3a Extensible Value Testing" variant
14:44:00 [ericP]
pointer to the -commnts list:
14:44:12 [ericP]
(plus one from last month on previous archive page)
14:44:35 [ericP]
(plus one from last month on previous archive page)
14:44:55 [DanC]
DONE ACTION Kendall effect "RESOLVED to adopt 3.9 as an objective"
14:44:55 [DanC]
(not recorded)
14:45:15 [DaveB]
it's in
14:46:02 [FarrukhNajmi]
DONE ACTION DaveB: write up this educational metadata UC
14:46:10 [kendall]
q+ to say +1
14:46:35 [FarrukhNajmi]
? free text sreach would be useful addition
14:46:39 [kendall]
zakim, mute me
14:46:39 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should now be muted
14:47:01 [FarrukhNajmi]
14:47:05 [kendall]
zakim, unmute me
14:47:05 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
14:47:27 [FarrukhNajmi]
?: Should we include this new use case
14:47:35 [tom]
14:47:39 [kendall]
zakim, mute me
14:47:39 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should now be muted
14:47:43 [FarrukhNajmi]
Lots of comments in favour of inclusion
14:47:46 [kendall]
14:47:57 [FarrukhNajmi]
None against inclusion.
14:48:09 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Editor has been advised to include
14:48:15 [DaveB]
14:48:59 [kendall]
14:49:35 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whose speaking?
14:49:40 [AndyS]
Rob is
14:49:50 [kendall]
Rob Shearer
14:50:43 [FarrukhNajmi]
Can someone summarize the discussion. I am losing the thread
14:52:31 [tom]
tom has joined #dawg
14:52:39 [kendall]
zakim, unmute me
14:52:39 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
14:55:37 [Yoshio]
q+ to ask what is the relatinship to the "tell me about" query issue at the end of the day?
14:56:58 [AndyS]
One thing is that came out in email was getting RDFList structures is hard without that, Yoshio..
14:57:01 [Yoshio]
* I think short summary is needed on IRC
14:57:26 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC can you verbally summarize the record worthy points of this discussion to help scribe.
14:57:39 [DanC]
ok, I'll try to summarize
14:58:00 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Sumary of thread
14:58:18 [DanC]
ack yoshio
14:58:18 [Zakim]
Yoshio, you wanted to ask what is the relatinship to the "tell me about" query issue at the end of the day?
14:58:28 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS has some concerns on the new use case RDFS/OWL related
14:59:18 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Understand that the use case deals with Vanilla Graph queries and not "Tell Me About" queries
14:59:32 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Agreed with DanC
14:59:48 [DanC]
s/RobS/AndyS/ I think
15:00:07 [FarrukhNajmi]
Robs speaking?
15:00:08 [AndyS]
Yes - AndyS
15:00:23 [AndyS]
always agrees with the chair :-) Well..
15:00:32 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Concerned about any mention of OWL in specific
15:00:52 [FarrukhNajmi]
ACtion: JIH elaborate use case in stopry form
15:00:59 [FarrukhNajmi]
15:01:06 [rob_]
my concern was about endorsing approach to OWL that doesn't work in general
15:01:19 [kendall]
Action: JimH elaborate his proposed use case in story form
15:01:26 [kendall]
zakim, unmute me
15:01:26 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark was not muted, kendall
15:01:35 [DanC]
How Many comment
15:01:35 [ericP]
incoming comments:
15:01:42 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Anyone read incoming comments on UC&R?
15:01:56 [Yoshio]
* speaking?
15:01:58 [kendall]
same as it's always been
15:01:59 [DanC]
15:02:11 [Yoshio]
* or sleeping?
15:02:23 [alberto]
it seems Jim use-cased relates to DaveB about "give me useful stuff about X" and the RDF/S and/or thesaurus API - see
15:02:44 [SteveH]
kendall: it not linked from the forntpage anymore (AFAICT)
15:03:00 [DaveB]
Thinking about my new UC, I think it also motivates (at least allowing) RDFS inferncing
15:03:00 [kendall]
Steve: ouch. Hmm, complain to DanC 'bout that, I think
15:03:16 [kendall]
DaveB: I'll make note of that
15:03:28 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Swedish name writes how about how many requirements. This one scares me.
15:03:45 [tom]
I think a "count" is very important. Simon: Can you comment?
15:03:45 [kendall]
daveb: do you mean 4.6?
15:03:46 [FarrukhNajmi]
b) How do u know the documents are different
15:03:51 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whats was a?
15:04:14 [alberto]
DaveB - ok
15:04:41 [SimonR]
tom: I agree, but I'm listening to other people for a moment about it....
15:04:45 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Start with list of triples (input doc, take its deductive closure) and query over it
15:05:02 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whose speaking. RobS?
15:05:16 [SteveH]
FarrukhNajmi: yes
15:05:17 [kendall]
Farr: yes
15:05:52 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Inclined to say NO
15:06:10 [ericP]
zakim, q+ to show how to get on the speaker queue
15:06:11 [AndyS]
q+ to talk about count in select and count in pattern
15:06:11 [Zakim]
I see ericP on the speaker queue
15:06:23 [ericP]
15:06:36 [FarrukhNajmi]
SimonR: One thing we could do is support aggregate functions that are functions of a result \
15:06:40 [DanC]
ack andy
15:06:40 [Zakim]
AndyS, you wanted to talk about count in select and count in pattern
15:07:03 [tom]
Yes, I think we're talking about counts over the result sets.
15:07:16 [ericP]
15:07:16 [KevinW]
15:07:32 [SimonR]
Typical aggregate functions: count(), average(), minimum(), etc.
15:07:34 [kendall]
kevin: "q+"
15:07:38 [SteveH]
15:07:39 [ericP]
Kevin, asking for the queue is "q?"
15:07:45 [KevinW]
15:07:48 [SteveH]
+1 to AndyS that is
15:07:49 [DanC]
ack kevin
15:08:04 [kendall]
zakim, mute me
15:08:04 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should now be muted
15:08:11 [FarrukhNajmi]
Kevin: This is related to limits. If we did limits then not a big extension to do count
15:08:15 [kendall]
+1 on danc's type/token distinction
15:08:31 [JosD]
q+ to mention the case of list elements
15:08:41 [DanC]
ack jos
15:08:41 [Zakim]
JosD, you wanted to mention the case of list elements
15:08:50 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Next step is for someone to propose what to do about this
15:09:00 [tom]
Can we not bind the value of a count to a variable, feed this back into a query? We certainly use this feature a lot.
15:09:18 [FarrukhNajmi]
JosD: You cannot avoid the cases where count is useful
15:09:33 [Yoshio]
average() ? then variance()... I think count () is enough
15:09:44 [SteveH]
Yoshio: i agree
15:09:53 [tom]
DanC, Yes, I'm willing to write back...
15:09:55 [afs]
afs has joined #dawg
15:09:56 [kendall]
zakim, unmute me
15:09:56 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
15:09:59 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Can someone write back to sender that this is interesting point
15:10:08 [FarrukhNajmi]
Tom: WIlling to do so
15:10:11 [FarrukhNajmi]
Who was second?
15:10:17 [SimonR]
Yoshio: The question of which aggregate functions we support is a separate issue, but there should be some generic method of including them.
15:10:28 [ericP]
I was, but ducked out in favor of Tom
15:10:32 [Yoshio]
I agree
15:10:39 [Yoshio]
to SimonR
15:10:42 [FarrukhNajmi]
ACTION: Tom to folloowup
15:11:02 [afs]
:AndyS sameAs :afs
15:11:02 [FarrukhNajmi]
on posting response to sender and make no comittements on behalf of WG
15:11:14 [Yoshio]
15:11:41 [FarrukhNajmi]
Where are we in agenda?
15:11:58 [DaveB]
sec 3 use cases
15:12:03 [SimonR]
DanC: Is this content selection for mobile devices draft based on CC/PP?
15:12:18 [kendall]
zakim, mute me
15:12:18 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should now be muted
15:12:30 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whose speaking?
15:12:31 [DaveB]
15:13:03 [kendall]
zakim, unmute me
15:13:03 [Zakim]
Kendall_Clark should no longer be muted
15:13:04 [FarrukhNajmi]
SteveH: Maybe we can get them to write what the query might look like
15:13:19 [FarrukhNajmi]
15:13:32 [tom]
tom has joined #dawg
15:13:32 [kendall]
+1 RobS's point
15:13:45 [DanC]
kendall, if you agree with rob's point, it would help to write it down
15:13:54 [DanC]
I and the scribe are struggling to follow
15:13:59 [FarrukhNajmi]
Sorry I lost it
15:14:12 [DanC]
no apology necessary
15:14:19 [Yoshio]
* Let's make more use of IRC!
15:14:35 [FarrukhNajmi]
Trying... New to scribe and WG.
15:14:36 [kendall]
DanC: huh?
15:14:43 [kendall]
in IRC or in document?
15:15:45 [FarrukhNajmi]
?: WOuld be nice to have a liason
15:15:51 [ericP]
DanC: acceptable to not liason with DI, but it would be nice to do so.
15:16:03 [SimonR]
(That was from me Farrukh, the "liaison" comment)
15:16:25 [rob_]
boolean or "grounded" queries
15:16:34 [ericP]
count(*) > 0 is a true or false answer
15:16:35 [FarrukhNajmi]
? Want to be able to form a query that return boolean values
15:17:13 [afs]
Or "LIMIT 1" - allows the query to stop as soon as one thing found.
15:17:27 [FarrukhNajmi]
?: Special case of zero variables returning boolean value is a special case of varaible bindings
15:17:39 [FarrukhNajmi]
What was teh ACTION?
15:17:41 [DanC]
ACTION Simon: write to the WG about boolean queries
15:17:53 [SimonR]
ACTION: I'll write to the list and explain how a variable bind with zero variables is equivalent to boolean queries.
15:18:02 [ericP]
ACTION Simon: explain how reporting 0 veriable bindings is equivilent to boolean response.
15:18:32 [ericP]
hmm, i shouldn't have tried to clarify cause i can't remember how to get rid of 4
15:18:37 [DanC]
Zakim, next agendum
15:18:37 [Zakim]
agendum 4. "Review test materials" taken up [from DanC]
15:18:38 [ericP]
sorry simon
15:18:50 [Zakim]
15:19:29 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Had discussion of datatype queries, somewhat tangential but did uncover some intersting impl experience
15:19:33 [SimonR]
ericP: NP. We're just all so redundantly helpful. :)
15:20:05 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: EricP has written up a couple of tests
15:20:25 [FarrukhNajmi]
Where are they: ?
15:20:27 [DaveB]
ericp disjunction
15:20:27 [ericP]
15:20:37 [DanC]
disjunction implementation
15:20:53 [Yoshio]
Zakim, mute Yoshio
15:20:53 [Zakim]
Yoshio should now be muted
15:21:46 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whats teh Action?
15:22:17 [ericP]
start with "ACTION Steve:"
15:22:34 [SteveH]
ACTION: SteveH to add ericP's disjunctions tests to test cases doc
15:22:41 [kendall]
is there a way to have the bot tell us which actions it knows about?
15:22:54 [DanC]
RRSAgent, list actions
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
I see 6 open action items:
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Kendall: consider the larger comments from Brian and Yoshio post-publication [1]
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Tom to folloowup [2]
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Simon to write to the WG about boolean queries [3]
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: I'll write to the list and explain how a variable bind with zero variables is equivalent to boolean queries. [4]
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Simon to explain how reporting 0 veriable bindings is equivilent to boolean response. [5]
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: SteveH to add ericP's disjunctions tests to test cases doc [6]
15:22:54 [RRSAgent]
recorded in
15:23:29 [DanC]
Zakim, next agendum
15:23:29 [Zakim]
agendum 5. "Requirements" taken up [from DanC]
15:23:49 [FarrukhNajmi]
-- 3.4 Subgraph Results
15:24:23 [kendall]
i believe jimh's action item is missing from the bot...fwiw
15:24:37 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Robs had said ...?. Eric gave an example of subgraph results
15:24:46 [Yoshio]
I wonder if we can live without the "sub" but just "graph results"
15:24:54 [kendall]
ACTION: JimH to elaborate his use case.
15:25:02 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Does not explain how it matches either
15:26:10 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Comes down to last 4 words of sub-graph results.
15:26:23 [FarrukhNajmi]
Kendal: Already stricken.
15:26:38 [DanC]
15:27:37 [Zakim]
15:27:39 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Anyone object to adopting r3.4
15:27:51 [FarrukhNajmi]
15:27:58 [DaveB]
Simon speaking
15:28:04 [FarrukhNajmi]
Simon and Ronb abstain
15:28:05 [patH]
patH has joined #dawg
15:28:08 [Yoshio]
15:28:14 [FarrukhNajmi]
15:28:41 [FarrukhNajmi]
AndyS: Does that mean we are striking 3.4a
15:28:45 [FarrukhNajmi]
Kendal: Kill it
15:29:06 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whats teh decision?
15:29:14 [kendall]
ACTION: Strike 3.4a from doc
15:29:26 [kendall]
ACTION: Move 3.4's status to ACCEPTED.
15:29:47 [FarrukhNajmi]
-- 3.6 Optional Match
15:30:05 [FarrukhNajmi]
?: How to format
15:30:16 [jhendler]
jhendler has joined #dawg
15:30:29 [FarrukhNajmi]
Kendall: Prefer ASCII format
15:31:04 [FarrukhNajmi]
Several people prefer ASCII
15:31:10 [FarrukhNajmi]
What is the format for?
15:31:33 [Zakim]
15:31:35 [SimonR]
It's for displaying sample results in tabular form.
15:31:40 [jhendler]
zakim, [umd] is jimH
15:31:40 [Zakim]
+jimH; got it
15:31:58 [FarrukhNajmi]
3.8 Bookmarkable Queries
15:32:12 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: No update. ACTION continues
15:32:55 [FarrukhNajmi]
Discuss timing of f2f first day....
15:33:44 [FarrukhNajmi]
How long a drive from LAX to venue. 90 Miles
15:34:05 [tom]
tom has joined #dawg
15:34:06 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Chair nervous about people traveling day of meeting
15:34:22 [FarrukhNajmi]
EricP: wants 30 min delay on first day of f2f
15:35:53 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Use reg form for ride coordination instead of WG list
15:36:10 [FarrukhNajmi]
Not many people coming day of meeting
15:37:34 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: Start 9AM on day 1 of f2f
15:37:43 [FarrukhNajmi]
15:38:05 [DanC]
round streamable doodad
15:38:12 [DaveB]
my reply
15:38:30 [DaveB]
oops grammar
15:39:05 [FarrukhNajmi]
AndyS: WOuld rather not have optional addition
15:39:53 [DaveB]
"When returning multiple results there must be a form of the protocol
15:39:53 [DaveB]
that allows streaming of results. In this form, the results must be
15:39:53 [DaveB]
returned to the client so that all the data in one result are
15:39:53 [DaveB]
available before all the data for the next result."
15:40:08 [DaveB]
+"This does not require an ordering of results"
15:41:06 [FarrukhNajmi]
Several people for adding this requirements.
15:41:13 [FarrukhNajmi]
Whose rasing conecrn?
15:41:16 [DaveB]
15:41:16 [kendall]
15:41:39 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Not in favor of adding this
15:41:41 [kendall]
it's not more or less detailed than many other reqs
15:42:01 [kendall]
danc: it seems to be someone in Boston. 781 area code.
15:42:05 [kendall]
the breather, i mean
15:42:07 [FarrukhNajmi]
Not me
15:42:11 [FarrukhNajmi]
Im on mute
15:42:16 [FarrukhNajmi]
and not breating much
15:42:19 [kendall]
Farr: :>
15:42:25 [Yoshio]
15:42:48 [patH]
when the chair asks everyone to stop breathing, we rebel, OK?
15:43:01 [kendall]
15:44:13 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Not worded in terms that client is asking for streaming of results
15:44:36 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: When return multiple results is irrelevant
15:44:54 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: The fact that such a protocol exists does not mean the server is using it
15:45:12 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC: DO you have a technical reason for not supporting this?
15:45:56 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: The words in teh requirement are not requiring that server stream results
15:46:20 [FarrukhNajmi]
Simon speaking?
15:46:24 [kendall]
15:46:35 [jhendler]
q+ re: some query protocols and how they did this
15:46:36 [SimonR]
Farrukh: No, I'm nor speaking.
15:46:41 [SimonR]
15:46:47 [jhendler]
q+ to mention some query protocols and how they did this
15:46:52 [FarrukhNajmi]
ACTION: Andy will write email clarifying this
15:47:16 [DanC]
ack jhendler
15:47:16 [Zakim]
jhendler, you wanted to mention some query protocols and how they did this
15:48:32 [FarrukhNajmi]
JimH: A lot of things that do remote SQL server designed for knowl;edge base queries instead of db queries often assume that you have a lot of results
15:48:41 [kendall]
JimH points out that many remote KB query protocols don't return results but, rather, a number and a pointer, so that client could "control" the returning of results.
15:48:49 [DanC]
ack ericp
15:48:52 [kendall]
JimH mentions OKBC, Parka, SQL, other stuff
15:48:52 [DanC]
ack kendall
15:49:35 [FarrukhNajmi]
Kendal: We need to ack that there is significant support to add this use case
15:49:49 [kendall]
ACTION: JimH to send mail desribing the history of remote KB query, including any mention of Denial of Service problems that may be relevant.
15:50:20 [kendall]
can i edit an action?
15:50:33 [Yoshio]
* breathman again
15:50:55 [kendall]
Return of BreathMan
15:51:04 [FarrukhNajmi]
Its not me
15:51:18 [afs]
I'm muted locally
15:51:32 [SimonR]
Does anyone know the web architecture principles recommendation well enough to know whether there's a principle against stateful services?
15:51:53 [kendall]
Simon: there isn't really anything explicitly, as I recall.
15:52:28 [FarrukhNajmi]
RobS: Who is interested in adding requirement on disjunction?
15:52:43 [Yoshio]
15:53:06 [FarrukhNajmi]
Its not me. Please believe me :->
15:53:17 [kendall]
Farrukh: I do. :>
15:53:53 [tom]
Yes, I'm on mute also...
15:54:03 [kendall]
who's in boston area?
15:54:10 [FarrukhNajmi]
Me. But its not me
15:54:13 [kendall]
it seems to be from an un-zakim-identified caller. :>
15:54:22 [tom]
tom has joined #dawg
15:54:46 [FarrukhNajmi]
ACTION: EricP to chair in DanC absence. DanC traveling next week.
15:55:09 [Zakim]
15:55:11 [Zakim]
15:55:12 [Zakim]
15:55:15 [Zakim]
15:55:17 [DanC]
RRSAgent, make logs world
15:55:18 [Zakim]
15:55:21 [KevinW]
KevinW has left #dawg
15:55:23 [FarrukhNajmi]
Thanks for all the help every one.
15:55:26 [Zakim]
15:55:30 [DaveB]
looks like I was ??P7, heyho
15:55:30 [Zakim]
- +1.781.942.aaaa
15:55:38 [Yoshio]
Good bye Breathman
15:55:39 [Zakim]
15:55:40 [Zakim]
15:55:40 [DaveB]
DaveB has left #dawg
15:55:45 [kendall]
Death to Breathman!
15:55:48 [kendall]
15:55:50 [Zakim]
15:55:52 [FarrukhNajmi]
Did I say it was not me :-;
15:55:54 [ericP]
15:55:55 [FarrukhNajmi]
15:55:59 [Yoshio]
15:56:00 [kendall]
Farrukh: really?! :>
15:56:09 [tom]
Bye all.
15:56:10 [ericP]
could you apply for another account?
15:56:11 [FarrukhNajmi]
FarrukhNajmi has left #dawg
15:56:19 [Zakim]
- +1.703.871.aabb
15:56:20 [Yoshio]
what do you mean?
15:56:26 [Zakim]
15:56:33 [Zakim]
- +1.714.539.aacc
15:56:37 [Zakim]
15:56:48 [Yoshio]
Did they give me another account?
15:56:48 [Zakim]
15:56:49 [ericP]
yoship, are you still dialed in?
15:56:56 [ericP]
15:57:03 [afs]
afs has left #dawg
15:57:11 [ericP]
zakim, who's here?
15:57:11 [Zakim]
On the phone I see Yoshio (muted), EricP
15:57:12 [Zakim]
On IRC I see jhendler, patH, kendall, RRSAgent, Zakim, ericP, DanC, SteveH, Yoshio
15:57:12 [Yoshio]
no, hanged up
15:57:18 [Yoshio]
15:57:22 [ericP]
zakim missed it
15:57:24 [Zakim]
15:57:31 [Zakim]
15:57:32 [Zakim]
SW_DAWG()10:30AM has ended
15:57:33 [Zakim]
Attendees were +1.781.942.aaaa, Kevin, Yoshio, EricP, +1.703.871.aabb, RobS, [ASemantics], AndyS, SteveH, +1.714.539.aacc, Kendall_Clark, DanC, JosD, JimH, PatH
16:11:54 [DanC]
kendall, yes, you can edit an action
16:12:07 [DanC]
ala: action 7 = ...replacement text...
16:19:18 [SteveH]
SteveH has left #dawg
17:04:44 [FarrukhNajmi]
FarrukhNajmi has joined #DAWG
17:07:25 [FarrukhNajmi]
DanC where can I find the IRC log? I accidently closed the window. If not available online could you mail it to me? Thanks for all the help today.
17:08:29 [FarrukhNajmi]
ericP in case DanC is out, would you be able to help with above?
17:31:35 [DanC]
RRSAgent, pointer?
17:31:35 [RRSAgent]
17:31:47 [DanC]
there, FarrukhNajmi
17:31:53 [FarrukhNajmi]
17:32:02 [FarrukhNajmi]
17:32:16 [DanC]
you can take the #T... part off
17:32:17 [FarrukhNajmi]
Thx. cu
17:32:25 [DanC]
18:56:30 [Zakim]
Zakim has left #dawg
20:39:25 [FarrukhNajmi]
FarrukhNajmi has left #DAWG