21:37:42 RRSAgent has joined #dawg 21:40:50 ericP has joined #dawg 21:42:09 agenda + Convene, take roll, review agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0043.html 21:42:20 agenda + Upcoming teleconferences 21:42:27 agenda + Face-to-face meeting 21:42:37 agenda + Use Cases 21:43:47 kendall has joined #dawg 21:44:13 let's see... I have regrets from Kevin Wilkinson, Janne Saarela 21:44:27 hi all 21:45:29 sometimes working from home sucks! 21:46:35 yeah, should do 21:47:23 DanC_: how long might this be today? any ideas? 21:48:12 officially scheduled duration is up to 90 minutes... 21:48:14 eikeon - what did you use on XP? 21:48:24 'k 21:48:25 thx 21:48:40 ... I'm wondering whether to wander around, discuss the charter, and socialize, or get in-and-out in 20 minutes. 21:48:45 trying to decide which phone to use; more expensive hands-free, or cheaper handsfull :> 21:49:16 well, a pretty high % of us have met each other, i suspect 21:49:23 getting in and out might make some sense for the first one? 21:49:30 don't get your computer involved in your VoIP set-up. use dedicated hardware. 21:50:14 straw poll: who would like to socialize, ask questions about the charter, and such? 21:50:14 Not sure about the "all met" - there are a few I haven't met - if the EU-ones show up 21:50:34 heh, i tried to hedge it, andy :> 21:51:00 socialise, structure UCs so material most useful - aim for 60 mins or so 21:51:07 we could put socializing near the end and let people go? 21:51:14 we might as well start understanding/agreeing the charter as well. 21:51:20 err, s/near the end/after the 'work'/ 21:51:32 but i'm fine either way 21:51:37 Going to happen sometime (charter) 21:51:57 socializing near the end is sorta missing the point... the point would be to socialize a bit to prepare for working together, e.g. for making formal decisions. 21:52:17 I think I'll aim for 60 minutes. 21:52:21 i yield the point. 21:52:28 whatever you think best is fine 21:52:40 (and, yes, i did miss that point, so thx.) 21:54:59 SW_DAWG()5:00PM has now started 21:55:06 +??P0 21:55:23 +DanC 21:55:49 zakim, ??P0 is AndyS 21:55:49 +AndyS; got it 21:56:03 AndyS: Think I ended up using messenger 21:56:51 + +1.603.502.aaaa 21:57:16 Zakim, aaaa is DanielK 21:57:16 +DanielK; got it 21:57:44 + +1.202.258.aabb 21:58:00 Zakim, aabb is KendalC 21:58:00 +KendalC; got it 21:58:49 DaveB has joined #dawg 21:59:24 + +1.760.672.aacc 21:59:48 Zakim, aacc is RobS 21:59:48 +RobS; got it 22:00:18 +EricP 22:00:28 + +39.033.266.aadd 22:00:52 Zakim, aadd is AlbertoR 22:00:52 +AlbertoR; got it 22:01:11 :) 22:01:46 + +1.440.009.aaee 22:01:50 that's me 22:01:56 rob has joined #dawg 22:01:58 Zakim, aaee is DaveB 22:02:01 +DaveB; got it 22:02:17 alberto has joined #dawg 22:02:23 + +1.202.462.aaff 22:02:47 Zakim, aaff is BryanT 22:02:47 +BryanT; got it 22:02:50 shouts out to the 202 :> 22:04:28 Meeting starts 22:04:34 scribe 22:05:15 Alberto - North of Milan 22:05:40 Bryan Thompson - Washington DC 22:05:44 Alberto Reggiori calling in from Italy Laveno Mombello(VA) - north of Milan - see my foaf for details 22:06:15 yes... 22:06:17 Andy - Bristol UK 22:06:33 rob - your name & org? 22:06:40 rob - where are you? 22:06:55 From Network Inference, currently in Carlsbad, CA. 22:07:01 Jean-François Baget - not here today 22:07:11 Kendall Clark - Washington DC 22:07:27 Daniel Krech - Washington 22:07:33 Patrick Stickler - ?? 22:07:37 Janne - regrets 22:07:49 DaveB - Bristol 22:07:52 + +31.71.514.aagg 22:07:57 s/DaveB/Dave Beckett/ 22:08:05 Zakim, aagg DirkG 22:08:05 I don't understand 'aagg DirkG', DanC_ 22:08:07 + +1.519.746.aahh 22:08:09 Zakim, aagg is DirkG 22:08:09 +DirkG; got it 22:08:10 Dirk - Leiden 22:08:20 Zakim, aahh JosD 22:08:20 I don't understand 'aahh JosD', DanC_ 22:08:38 Jos - Toronto 22:08:58 DanC - Kansas 22:09:24 EricP - Fujisawa 22:09:49 agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0043.html 22:09:57 Zakim, next item 22:09:57 agendum 1. "Convene, take roll, review agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0043.html" taken up [from DanC_] 22:10:00 Zakim, next item 22:10:00 agendum 1 was just opened, DanC_ 22:10:03 Zakim, close item 1 22:10:03 agendum 1 closed 22:10:04 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 22:10:05 zakim, aahh is JosD 22:10:05 2. Upcoming teleconferences [from DanC_] 22:10:06 +JosD; got it 22:10:08 Zakim, take up item 2 22:10:08 agendum 2. "Upcoming teleconferences" taken up [from DanC_] 22:10:21 dirkx has joined #dawg 22:11:00 All silence for DanC to propose ... Thursday @15:30 UTC 22:11:25 a tad early, but I can do it 22:11:42 AndyS - seconded 22:11:57 fine by me 22:12:02 No trouble from my end. 22:12:05 resolved - Thurs @15:30 UTC - next March 25 22:12:16 scribe will be Kendall Clark 22:12:23 Zakim, next item 22:12:23 agendum 3. "Face-to-face meeting" taken up [from DanC_] 22:13:04 DirkX offers April around XML-e 22:13:27 Amsterdam (far end) or Leiden 22:14:02 WiFi! 22:14:02 q+ to say 22-233 lookedgood for many folks 22:14:21 erikP said 22/23 best - was good/wide poll 22:14:32 EricP has checked out 22-23 April (Thurs/Fri) 22:14:43 q- 22:14:45 AndyP: citywide wifi http://www.wirelessleiden.nl/ 22:14:46 EricP - that's 60%+ 22:15:05 s/AndyP/AndyS/ 22:15:47 bijan has joined #dawg 22:15:58 hi bij 22:16:14 parisa? 22:16:25 C'est moi 22:16:27 F2F is probably in Leiden 22:17:22 if 5-20 people there - http://www.pieterskerk.com/content.cfm?menu=50&lang=NL 22:17:37 if 20-50 people http://www.vbmk.nl/locaties/zuidholland/leidhoogb.html 22:17:42 Rob - may have difficulty in being there 22:17:56 a nearby hotel or two would be nice -- urls, i m ean 22:18:01 if more than that another option is http://www.deburchtleiden.nl/ 22:18:03 EricP: people from XML-europe conf may have an opinion 22:18:12 sure / will add. 22:18:27 dirkx: should be easy 22:18:48 AndyS: can get to either - its cool 22:18:59 sure 22:19:21 DanC, Kendal, EricP, Alberto, +1, DaveB, Bryan, dirk on his bike 22:19:26 Jos: fine 22:19:45 Proposal: meet 22-23 April 22:19:49 Rob - abstain 22:19:54 Note to self; must ask Dan if we need telecom bridge or just dial on voice. 22:19:56 else carried 22:20:08 Zakim, next item 22:20:08 agendum 4. "Use Cases" taken up [from DanC_] 22:21:04 q+ talk about structure 22:21:14 q+, want to talk about structure later 22:21:55 AndyS likes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0063.html 22:22:16 -DirkG 22:22:17 Ok thanks folks - Dirk-Willem need to run now - have a good meeting. 22:22:31 is it the one about "query by example" from Patrick? 22:22:33 AndyS: also PS-3 22:22:53 seems to be some overlap 22:22:54 thompsonbry has joined #dawg 22:23:21 PS-3 --> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0053.html 22:23:35 DanC; nervous as not conjunctive query 22:23:44 Rob: same concern 22:25:35 Issue: scope of WG 22:25:39 likes DaveB thesaurus use-case - quite common 22:26:03 Some usages amy be inappropriate for some implementers 22:26:15 DaveB: this was asked for by a user 22:26:28 :> 22:26:45 q+ to mention annotea goals along this line 22:27:08 I see it as the kind of service that could be built on top of a more specific RDF query interface... 22:27:21 Daveb: interested in impl-ing 22:27:50 has rob got a (short) use case that could be given on the telcon? 22:28:23 smiles 22:28:33 AndyS: has impl'ed AFS-2! 22:28:54 ericp speaking? 22:29:04 q- 22:29:20 UC: Querying the RDF assertions licensed by a web resource. That is, re-representation of the web resource as RDF. 22:29:20 (missed that) EricP summarise please 22:29:48 q+ to talk about UC output 22:29:57 ack andy 22:29:57 AndyS, you wanted to talk about UC output 22:30:01 q+ speak for js-1 22:30:10 q+ to speak for js-1 22:30:26 ack kendall 22:30:26 kendall, you wanted to speak for js-1 22:30:34 can't hear over typer 22:30:37 scribe can't hear 22:31:06 kendal is speaking to JS-1 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0014.html , I think 22:31:13 Kendall: have imple'ed somethign like JS-1 22:33:19 Action: refine JS-1 on-list 22:33:29 ACTION kendall: refine JS-1 in email 22:34:44 discussion about charter limits on inference 22:34:44 Zakim, who's on the phone? 22:34:44 On the phone I see AndyS, DanC, DanielK, KendalC, RobS, EricP, AlbertoR, DaveB, BryanT, JosD 22:35:21 DanielK: catching up 22:35:52 Rob: simple AFS-1 => resource has property 22:36:15 +1 on AFS-1 22:36:18 +1 22:36:22 +1 (I'm muted) 22:36:25 e.g. "Get me all the things with this property, and tell me something about them" 22:36:42 Rob considers it complete 22:36:59 "If part" OK - nothing about results 22:37:08 s/complete/incomplete/ 22:37:42 ACTION AndyS: refine AFS-1: "Find the resource for the person called 'John S mith'" with some details 22:38:05 ericP: variable predicates possible 22:38:37 this is the kind of use case we're already deploying 22:39:07 EricP: variable predicates are beyong conjunctive RDF 22:39:18 +1 to give me all the predicates about X 22:39:33 EricP: Favourite is AFS-1 22:40:02 Zakim, mute me 22:40:02 sorry, kendall, I do not see a party named 'kendall' 22:40:07 Alberto: AFS-1 and AFS-2 22:40:09 hmm 22:40:12 I see 2 open action items: 22:40:12 ACTION: kendall to refine JS-1 in email [1] 22:40:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/17-dawg-irc#T22-33-29 22:40:12 ACTION: AndyS to refine AFS-1: "Find the resource for the person called 'John S mith'" with some details [2] 22:40:12 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/17-dawg-irc#T22-37-42 22:41:10 AFS-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0022.html 22:41:37 Alberto: want to start to get RDF to ask more specifi q later 22:42:00 Alberto: e.g. picture, FOAF file - need to start somewhere 22:42:17 q+ to ask about impl stories 22:42:35 hmm, zakim won't mute me ;> 22:42:37 Alberto: has impl'ed something like this 22:42:58 I didn't say everything; I said 'useful stuff' 22:43:14 perhaps you want a depth of inference limit or cost limit in the request? 22:43:50 ack andys 22:43:50 AndyS, you wanted to ask about impl stories 22:43:53 Isn't not necessarily depth. Everything within one hop can still be kind of a lot. I was thinking of at least providing predicates for choosing the properties in which you're interested. 22:44:17 how about asking for all predicates in a specific schema about a URI? 22:44:28 andyS asks whether UC wants impl stories 22:44:45 DanC; WG *is* the glossary 22:44:47 schemata :> 22:45:30 DanC: UC is a story - relate to features of system - useful at LC - not too general 22:45:55 What document is being read? 22:45:56 DanC: UC is engaging - clear to wider audience like press releases 22:46:15 DanC is reading http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0009.html 22:46:38 DanC: Story => requirements in detail (e.g. get property) 22:46:55 Alberto on AFS-2 ... 22:47:37 DaveB: EricP's all predicates of a thing (resource by URI?) 22:47:56 DaveB: "John Smith's name" AFS-1 22:48:11 DaveB: PS-{1,6} might want structure 22:48:34 What about pub/sub, eg, so that a remote server could choose to accept updates from another server? 22:48:45 ACTION EricP: send "tell me properties of X" case 22:49:15 Jos: DanC-1 : lat/long on census 22:49:23 census case http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0059.html 22:49:37 Jos: AFS-1,2 22:49:52 DanC-1 might have space/temporal stuff in it - nice/useful 22:49:55 Dirk Colaert joins 22:50:34 ??: protocol/query separation. xpointer example 22:50:42 BryanT 22:50:51 ref to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0048.html 22:50:52 ?? is Bryan 22:51:10 UC input: http://wiki.cognitiveweb.org/HttpRangeAndXPointer 22:51:37 i'll have some use cases soon that focus on the protocol, fwiw 22:52:05 DanC: Bookmarking queries 22:52:18 Bryan: adds frag to request 22:52:23 via range: 22:52:55 Query string semantics are, in HTTP, link to GET or GET+PUT ???? 22:53:31 Zakim, unmute me 22:53:31 sorry, kendall, I do not see a party named 'kendall' 22:53:41 Rob will provide UCs when on list 22:54:15 Rob: simple case: all people s.t. ... real customers interested in this 22:56:11 ACTION AlbertoS: elaborate on AFS-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0022.html 22:56:15 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JanMar/0022.html 22:56:45 +1 22:56:50 third 22:56:58 ADJOURNed. 22:57:03 Meeting adjourned 22:57:38 i'm going to ring off and save some $$ on my cell phone; will stay on IRC. 22:57:50 -KendalC 22:57:59 until I can post to mail, I can be contacted via rob.shearer@networkinference.com 22:58:10 -DaveB 22:59:37 caio 22:59:44 -BryanT 23:00:05 gerald has joined #dawg 23:00:50 hi gerald... 23:01:09 Dirk of Agfa is having trouble ith AAS 23:01:15 can you join us on the phone? 23:01:17 hi. I have to leave in <2 mins... 23:01:21 we're having a post-WG chat 23:01:30 can you join for just a sec? 23:01:37 Zakim, passcode? 23:01:37 the conference code is 7333, DanC_ 23:01:44 ok 23:01:57 +Gerald 23:03:50 ok guys, I need to leave now - 23:04:05 -Gerald 23:04:09 Zakim, mute DanielK 23:04:09 DanielK should now be muted 23:04:23 gerald has left #dawg 23:04:27 -JosD 23:04:28 -DanC 23:04:29 -RobS 23:04:32 -DanielK 23:04:36 -AndyS 23:05:22 alberto has left #dawg 23:05:26 -AlbertoR 23:05:31 -EricP 23:05:32 SW_DAWG()5:00PM has ended 23:05:33 Attendees were DanC, AndyS, +1.603.502.aaaa, DanielK, +1.202.258.aabb, KendalC, +1.760.672.aacc, RobS, EricP, +39.033.266.aadd, AlbertoR, +1.440.009.aaee, DaveB, +1.202.462.aaff, 23:05:35 ... BryanT, +31.71.514.aagg, +1.519.746.aahh, DirkG, JosD, Gerald 23:05:39 Dan - anything else I need to do? 23:05:59 and normally what's the procedure? 23:08:25 nothing else I need from you today... 23:08:33 ... I'm going to finish scribe duties today... 23:08:49 ... normally, I'd like the scribe to send email with an edited version of the notes. 23:09:38 OK - I'm off now 23:16:40 AndyS has joined #dawg 23:24:26 RRSAgent, make logs public 23:24:31 RRSAgent, make logs world-access 23:24:44 RRSAgent, pointer? 23:24:44 See http://www.w3.org/2004/03/17-dawg-irc#T23-24-44