13:11:45 RRSAgent has joined #wai-wcag 13:12:02 morning session: 13:12:12 present: 13:12:12 katie hartiso-shea, cessi 13:12:12 ben caldwell, trace r&d 13:12:12 tom croucher, uni sunderland 13:12:12 eric velleman, bartimeus 13:12:13 henk snetselaar, bartimeus 13:12:15 jose alonso, ficyt (w3c spanish office host, taw) 13:12:17 allistair garrison, accessinmind, ltd 13:12:19 shadi abou-zhara, w3c (ert wg, eowg) 13:12:21 wendy buckley, amadaeus (member, localization, usability) 13:12:23 andrew arch, natl info lib service (Aus), EOWG 13:12:25 lisa seeman, ubaccess 13:12:27 michael cooper, watchfire 13:12:29 wendy chisholm, w3c 13:12:31 === 13:12:33 afternoon 13:12:35 shadi, michael, ben, tom, jose, wendy 13:12:37 techs submission form 13:17:37 public-wcag2-techs@w3.org 13:25:39 pull-down for category and guideline reference need to be updated for changes in docs 13:27:00 action: tom create the script that will update category based on technology 13:27:22 action: ben populate the category with appropriate info once get script from tom 13:29:35 action: ben to add a disclaimer "submissions are subject to WG approval and do not guarantee inclusion in a techniques working draft" 13:30:03 sh1m|cannes has joined #wai-wcag 13:30:17 action: ben to fix subject line to match "short name" for submitted technique 13:44:27 going through gateway bugs 13:44:32 285: closed 13:44:33 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=285 13:44:45 302: closed 13:44:46 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=302 13:44:55 517: closed 13:44:56 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=517 13:45:31 520: assigned to tom 13:45:40 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=520 13:45:45 521: closed 13:45:51 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=521 13:48:04 522: assigned to tom 13:48:05 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=522 13:48:21 523: assigned to michael 13:48:22 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=523 13:48:37 524 13:48:59 lots of info in latest draft 13:50:02 how much move to gateway vs keep in guidelines/success criteria. 13:50:27 shadi has joined #wai-wcag 13:50:28 probably become guideline issue instead of gateway issue. 13:50:43 it's normative info required for success criteria. 13:51:32 526; http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=526 13:51:40 we need ids to nth degree, also apply to gateway 13:53:31 action: tom put ids on everything (to paragraph level, begun needs to finish) 13:53:56 assigned to tom 13:54:06 527: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=527 13:54:37 not link to bugzilla, link to the techniques form 13:55:12 no - about getting to issues from the document 13:55:32 action: wendy talk to judy about linking to issue lists 13:56:43 action: wendy and ben talk about "dead" link created by linking to issue summaries for guidelines that disappear. 13:57:51 possible solution: 404 redirect to query form or main bugzilla page. 13:58:10 528: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=528 13:58:27 closed. ben fixed the headers. 14:01:10 529: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=529 14:02:12 http://www.w3.org/2000/08/nba-manual/Overview.html 14:02:44 joseA has joined #wai-wcag 14:04:41 leave open. tom will fix. 14:05:58 530 tom pick one 14:06:03 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=530 14:06:48 531: close. leave as is. http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=531 14:07:57 532: use wording from guidelines (of text equiv) 14:07:58 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=532 14:09:33 533: use wording from guidelines 14:09:33 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=533 14:10:32 534: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=534 14:10:45 sounds html-like 14:10:55 however, controls need to be identified to the user 14:12:02 action: tom (and michael) figure out which part needs to be in gateway which part in html 14:12:12 535: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=535 14:14:32 metaprocess discussion about dealing with ednotes and bugzilla. 14:14:56 resolution: create a bugzilla entry for every ednote and cross reference (bugzilla) from ednote 14:15:20 assigned to tom 14:15:41 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=536 14:15:43 closed. 14:15:53 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=612 14:17:29 === 14:17:32 break in issue tracking. 14:17:39 ian demos Exit 14:18:12 (member access) http://www.w3.org/2003/12/exit/ 14:40:28 right now, we're too engrained in bugzilla (too much data to transfer) 14:40:58 plus, the interface for bugzilla is more interactive (allwos our participants to edit, rather than only editing xml file). 14:41:10 look at again in a few months after they complete the xforms interface 14:41:27 perhaps at or before last call when will have less open issues to transfer. 14:41:34 look into copying their reports. 14:41:47 emulate their process via bugzilla. 14:41:57 reviewers, tracking communication with 14:41:59 (issue) 14:42:35 action: wendy and ben look at exit scheme and think about how to emulate in bugzilla. 14:43:17 perhaps export bugzilla data to their schema and use their tools to create reports. 15:06:08 wendybreak has joined #wai-wcag 15:08:22 wendy has joined #wai-wcag 15:09:20 612: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=612 15:12:19 leave open. assigned to tom. 15:13:31 613: leave open. assigned to tom. 15:13:32 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=613 15:13:39 also 614 and 615 15:13:47 651: http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=651 15:14:25 assign to tom 15:14:33 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=758 15:15:26 an overview of methodology 15:15:49 link to eowg drafts 15:15:58 testing info etc 15:16:04 assign to tom 15:16:15 http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=762 15:19:36 cms: if content hasn't been generated yet, doesn't know title of where going. 15:19:50 it's one technique for facilitating and understanding. 15:19:52 not a criteria 15:20:50 assigned to tom. 15:21:01 === 15:21:10 principle 1 intro (tom's preview of proposed text)_ 15:22:41 ben has action to write intro to each principle 15:23:53 action: ben and tom draft intros to principles (to include in wcag 2.0 document as well as gateway) 15:25:18 === 15:25:21 test matrix 15:25:49 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004JanMar/att-0404/draft_test_matrix.html 15:29:07 move hpr to browser not AT 15:31:16 linux: 15:31:40 add emacspeak to linux as browser 15:32:16 add galeon as browser 15:32:39 add lynx and links as browsers 15:33:23 test other devices? 15:33:27 mobile phones (opera) 15:33:36 voicexml browser/phones 15:34:14 consider other platforms and devices 15:35:03 ipacs (linux), jaws on palm of some sort? 15:35:45 (open issue added) 15:36:44 add firefox as browser 15:36:50 add gnomespeak as at 15:37:19 remove ie5 15:38:36 action: jenae remove all currently listed ATs from linux table? 15:40:10 add input ats. speech recognition, keyboard interface, spellchecker/IE, etc. 15:40:20 http://trace.wisc.edu/linux/current.html#speech 15:41:04 some of the links are broken, send feedback to trace 15:41:59 add netscape 4, opera 7 15:42:13 konq depend on KDE. what do for versions? 15:43:20 action: tom figure out good list of browsers for linux. 15:43:48 can we assume that people will stay more up-to-date w/linux? 15:44:19 macintosh 15:44:29 delete ie6 on mac 15:44:35 check for versions on safari 15:45:00 issues with running old versions of netscape on macs 15:46:08 generalize: netscape 3 and under group and assign a single priority 15:46:14 add omniweb to list of mac browsers 15:46:28 only screenr eader for mac was outspoken 15:46:39 most others delete 15:47:13 action: jenae to check on availability of assistive technologies for macs 15:47:25 action tom: check on apple screen reader 15:47:34 what about OSs that have the ability to enlarge text 15:48:25 include OS features: e.g., windows magnifier, mac speech output 15:50:08 issue: combinations of assistive technologies 15:51:48 add amaya to linux 15:53:14 windows 15:53:28 s/lynx/lynx for windows 15:53:36 s/lynx for dos 15:54:13 screen readers can't interact with dos windows 15:54:32 versions of the assistive technologies 15:55:35 action: jenae proposal for versions of assistive technologies (for windows) 15:55:43 add amaya for mac 15:56:02 supernova (hal+magnifier) 15:56:09 add 15:56:22 magic 15:57:00 magic's table navigation is from older version of jaws 15:57:25 aol have own browser 15:57:28 ? 15:57:56 aol? 15:58:24 other platforms: webtv, other devices, etc. 15:58:46 webtv requires visual access and ability to use remote (system requirement) 15:59:43 break out windows into windows 98? windows xp, windows 2000, win nt 16:01:17 how diff are implementations between nt and xp? 16:02:14 netscape 4.7 on xp? 16:03:11 action: jenae does netscape 4.7 work on xp? 16:03:24 mac os 9? 16:03:47 add icab to mac 16:04:11 linux: KDE 1, 2 16:04:29 s/KDE 2,3, gnome 1,2 16:05:02 === 16:05:06 define priorities for test matrix 16:07:48 must, should, may 16:07:52 accept submissions at any level 16:07:59 must - only level verify. not sure how much verify. 16:08:31 notes about at quirks could scare away developers. 16:08:43 "this doesn't work in jaws 4" could result in someone not doing it. 16:09:01 p1 - we have to do ourselves (we need to ensure the fidelity of the test) 16:09:18 p2 - things we can scour other resources for (only testourselves if unsure about) 16:09:23 p3 - things we're not going to do 16:09:30 if we stumble across info, log 16:11:45 p1 - we must obtain test data 16:11:53 p2 - we should try to get decent test data if we can 16:11:58 p3 - nice to have 16:12:18 are there things we exclude from p1? 16:12:32 e.g., no longer supported by company who built? older than x years old? 16:13:09 i.e., what is likely to fall into p1? 16:13:12 common use? 16:17:43 netscape 4.71 pre 2000 (6 came out in 2000) 16:18:41 4th quarter 1999 16:23:07 look at browser logs 16:23:48 security issues are forcing upgrades 16:24:25 eowg business case benefits is compatibility to older browsers. 16:26:37 action: tom check if can use access logs from company has worked with 16:26:53 see if can use it anonymously 16:28:17 action: wac w3c logs 16:28:21 action: ben w3c logs 16:28:44 action: wac check with offices to get differences in browser use around the world 16:28:59 won't get asst. tech use from logs. 16:30:07 to determine p1: look at log data (most commonly used browsers) + a few choice older browsers + some asst techs 16:32:06 cmn via sidar could fidn out s. america 16:32:19 find time categorizing what needs to be done in general sense 16:32:29 this is what we can do...if others want to do more...here you go 16:33:54 other organizations to do testing on certain platforms? 16:34:05 w3cschools (interesting stats) 16:34:41 ie6 72%, moz 9, netscape 4 <1/2% 16:34:49 opera 2% (but it's set to "lie") 16:36:41 usage axis (for browsers). assist. techs - how determine? dno't havfe the same data. 16:43:29 uaag for last call: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/impl-pr2/ 16:43:38 select different browsers depending on the test? 16:44:56 does the expected behavior happen? does anything happen? 16:45:32 action: jenae and wendy to consider further, make initial proposal 16:49:51 joseA has left #wai-wcag 16:51:48 RRSAgent, help? 16:51:48 I'm logging. Sorry, nothing found for 'help' 16:54:28 rrsagent, make logs world-visible 16:54:42 rrsagent, bye 16:54:42 I see 21 open action items: 16:54:42 ACTION: tom create the script that will update category based on technology [1] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-27-00 16:54:42 ACTION: ben populate the category with appropriate info once get script from tom [2] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-27-22 16:54:42 ACTION: ben to add a disclaimer "submissions are subject to WG approval and do not guarantee inclusion in a techniques working draft" [3] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-29-35 16:54:42 ACTION: ben to fix subject line to match "short name" for submitted technique [4] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-30-17 16:54:42 ACTION: tom put ids on everything (to paragraph level, begun needs to finish) [5] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-53-31 16:54:42 ACTION: wendy talk to judy about linking to issue lists [6] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-55-32 16:54:42 ACTION: wendy and ben talk about "dead" link created by linking to issue summaries for guidelines that disappear. [7] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T13-56-43 16:54:42 ACTION: tom (and michael) figure out which part needs to be in gateway which part in html [8] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T14-12-02 16:54:42 ACTION: wendy and ben look at exit scheme and think about how to emulate in bugzilla. [9] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T14-42-35 16:54:42 ACTION: ben and tom draft intros to principles (to include in wcag 2.0 document as well as gateway) [10] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T15-23-53 16:54:42 ACTION: jenae remove all currently listed ATs from linux table? [11] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T15-38-36 16:54:42 ACTION: tom figure out good list of browsers for linux. [12] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T15-43-20 16:54:42 ACTION: jenae to check on availability of assistive technologies for macs [13] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T15-47-13 16:54:42 ACTION: tom to check on apple screen reader [14] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T15-47-25 16:54:42 ACTION: jenae proposal for versions of assistive technologies (for windows) [15] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T15-55-35 16:54:42 ACTION: jenae does netscape 4.7 work on xp? [16] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T16-03-11 16:54:42 ACTION: tom check if can use access logs from company has worked with [17] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T16-26-37 16:54:42 ACTION: wac w3c logs [18] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T16-28-17 16:54:42 ACTION: ben w3c logs [19] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T16-28-21 16:54:42 ACTION: wac check with offices to get differences in browser use around the world [20] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T16-28-44 16:54:42 ACTION: jenae and wendy to consider further, make initial proposal [21] 16:54:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2004/03/04-wai-wcag-irc#T16-45-32 16:54:57 ben has left #wai-wcag