14:59:41 RRSAgent has joined #rdfcore 14:59:55 ericm has changed the topic to: rdfcore dec 5 telecon 15:00:17 SW_RDFCore()10:00AM has now started 15:00:18 +DanC 15:00:37 SW_RDFCore()10:00AM has ended 15:01:20 Zakim, this is RDF 15:01:20 ok, DanC 15:01:27 +??P18 15:01:37 +FrankM 15:01:40 -??P18 15:01:41 +??P18 15:01:53 +DanC 15:01:57 +DanBri 15:02:18 +??P21 15:02:23 bwm has joined #rdfcore 15:02:30 -DanC 15:02:39 +Mike_Dean 15:02:54 +DanC 15:03:25 -DanBri 15:03:59 agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Dec/0006.html 15:04:25 zakim, dial emiller-bos 15:04:26 ok, ericm; the call is being made 15:04:26 +Emiller 15:04:42 jjc has joined #rdfcore 15:04:51 Zakim,who's on the call? 15:05:01 Zakim, who's on the call? 15:05:01 On the phone I see ??P18, FrankM, DanC, ??P21, Mike_Dean, Emiller 15:05:02 +??P20 15:05:12 Zakim, ??P20 is danbri 15:05:12 +danbri; got it 15:05:13 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Dec/0006.html 15:05:21 Zakim, ??P21 is jjc 15:05:21 +jjc; got it 15:05:39 Zakim, ??P18 is ilrt 15:05:39 +ilrt; got it 15:05:45 1. Admin 15:05:46 - scribe 15:05:46 - roll call 15:05:46 - approve minutes of the previous meeting 15:05:46 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Nov/0063.html 15:05:50 2. Update from team on PR 15:05:55 3. mime-type registration 15:05:59 4. Postponed issues: advice to the CG on what to do about them. 15:06:02 Zakim, who's on the call? 15:06:02 On the phone I see ilrt, FrankM, DanC, jjc, Mike_Dean, Emiller, danbri 15:06:05 Received on 15:06:08 roll call 15:06:13 Zakim, ilrt has bwm, jang, daveb 15:06:13 +bwm, jang, daveb; got it 15:06:33 gk has joined #rdfcore 15:06:38 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Nov/0063.html 15:07:09 DanC: minutes comment 15:07:18 Zakim, mute danbri 15:07:18 danbri should now be muted 15:07:21 zakim, mute danbri 15:07:21 danbri was already muted, ericm 15:07:22 Zakim, who's talking 15:07:22 I don't understand 'who's talking', jjc 15:07:29 Zakim, who's speaking 15:07:29 I don't understand 'who's speaking', jjc 15:07:32 Zakim, who's speaking? 15:07:43 jjc, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ilrt (15%), FrankM (39%) 15:07:48 on minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Nov/0065.html 15:08:25 amendments are the last mod dates and size sin 0065 15:08:31 of th docs to publish 15:08:53 +GrahamKlyne 15:08:55 -GrahamKlyne 15:09:19 +GrahamKlyne 15:09:45 jang: dated zip files are made for each tetst cases doc 15:09:55 bwm: happy with amendment 0065? 15:10:02 seconded; danc 15:10:04 against: not 15:10:08 ... none 15:10:12 minutes of 2003-11-07 approved 15:10:23 -danbri 15:10:34 item 2 - discuss PR request status with the team 15:11:18 ilrt += danbri 15:11:51 congrats were given to having lots of detailed test cases 15:13:42 summary or rdf core test results http://www.w3.org/2003/11/results/rdf-core-tests 15:15:17 frankm points to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/Overview.html 15:15:18 dec 5 15:16:04 Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 15:03:21 GMT 15:16:08 Content-Length: 425004 15:16:41 md5sum 4ec3fa06098da0e9821cc96beea77328 15:18:24 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 15:19:32 RRSAgent, pointer? 15:19:32 See http://www.w3.org/2003/12/05-rdfcore-irc#T15-19-32 15:23:13 primer... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/Overview.html 15:23:24 -Mike_Dean 15:26:19 q+ to report RDFS modifications outstanding (but agreed in WG prior to PR req decision), option (I expect likely won't) to make minor wording tweaks per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0124.html plus change range of rdf:predicate to be rdfs:Resource per WG decision. 15:27:08 I get: cvs update: nothing known about WD-rdf-primer-200301117 15:28:08 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/ 15:28:22 ~/w3ccvs/WWW/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR$ 15:28:45 then redirected to a file, local diffed 15:28:50 www/cvs.w3.org/WWW/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117 15:30:13 $ cvs diff -bwu -r1.22 -r1.25 Overview.html |less 15:30:42 see http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/tmp/rdfcore.txt 15:33:32 cvs co -D'Wed, 05 Nov 2003 02:27:20 GMT' -p WWW/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-primer-20030117/Overview.html > some file 15:33:53 --- 15:34:21 primer, danC to add: 15:34:40 action: brian to review latest changes to primer are ok. 15:35:29 (I just made the rdf:predicate changes above to RDFS.) 15:36:15 syntax - changes outlined 1) german spelling 2) changelog pointers in changelog 15:37:18 daveb has license to make changes above 15:37:24 shema - 15:37:26 schema 15:37:50 danbri - changes outstanding, some wording fixes (editorial advisory) - not needed to make them 15:38:06 2nd was to be consistent with range of rdf:predicate consist with semantics - want to make that change 15:38:21 ... think that is ready to go now in the CVS version 15:38:24 ---------------------------- 15:38:24 revision 1.46 15:38:24 date: 2003/12/05 15:33:30; author: danbri; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 15:38:24 Range of rdf:predicate is rdfs:Resource, per change agreed by WG in 15:38:24 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Nov/0063.html 15:38:25 - 15:38:53 danbri: also changed the xml file in the dir - rdfs schema file 15:38:57 revision 1.46 15:38:57 date: 2003/12/05 15:33:30; author: danbri; state: Exp; lines: +3 -3 15:38:59 golden 15:39:05 bwm: ack 15:39:31 semantics 15:39:32 I'm going to double-check these over weekend, but I believe RDFS is done. 15:39:55 primer - above 15:39:59 test cases 15:40:14 jang: an explicit marker added for simple entailment, added with auth last time 15:40:20 ... updates to table 15:40:40 daveb: missing ' or " 15:40:44 ... in ntriples 15:41:06 7Nov meeting corresponds to test cvs 1.64 15:41:31 1.68 ok? 15:41:44 bwm: o 15:41:45 k 15:41:52 ok 15:41:57 concepts 15:42:38 as of 7Nov wG meeting we were at revision 1.55 15:42:38 date: 2003/10/07 14:19:58; 15:43:22 "PR changes made." 1.56 2003/11/15 15:02:04 15:43:48 "Change prev version link" 1.57 2003/11/15 15:06:05 15:44:25 bwm: good 15:45:47 schema: done. syntax: epsilon. test: epsilon. concepts: done primer: done. semantics: pat-state. 15:46:00 q+ to ask whether LBase gets republished too 15:46:04 q? 15:46:20 schema: done. syntax: epsilon. test: epsilon. concepts: done primer: done pending bwm review. semantics: pat-state. 15:46:26 Test case todo: [[ 15:46:28 From: Carlos Viegas Dam&sio 15:46:28 Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:29:02 +0100 15:46:28 X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/01ba01c39267$e6197260$dc9e17c3@pccd 15:46:33 http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-testcases-20031010/#datatypeString 15:46:33 fix to: 15:46:33 datatypeString ::= '"' string '"' '^^' uriref 15:46:33 ]] 15:47:33 < string '^^' --- 15:47:33 > '"' string '"' '^^' jcarroll: most of changes were the changelog 15:48:14 3 mime type 15:48:21 gk: registriation is in a fine state 15:48:27 just a condition of timing 15:48:50 ... sufficiently stable to point at, reasonable to request reg publication 15:49:05 but seen a doc says we should wait to REC 15:49:29 dajobe_ has joined #rdfcore 15:49:34 gk...but wouldn't favour that 15:49:34 bwm has joined #rdfcore 15:49:58 ack danc 15:49:58 DanC, you wanted to think out loud 15:49:59 dajobe_ has joined #rdfcore 15:50:01 This conference is scheduled to end in 10 minutes; 2 ports must be freed 15:50:04 bwm has joined #rdfcore 15:50:18 danc: current state, cites concepts 15:50:23 daveb: & syntax 15:50:25 no, not current... 15:50:30 I'm asking about the terminal state 15:50:41 gk: mime type reg will cite w3c doc 15:51:06 current http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-03 15:51:15 gk: iana reg will cite published RFC 15:51:19 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 15:51:20 that RFC will cite the w3c doc 15:51:25 danc: & w3c doc will cite rfc? 15:51:29 gk: not sure 15:52:05 gk: no formal last call but an IESG approved pub 15:52:31 gk: currently aiming for informational rfc 15:53:20 daveb: points to syntax, concepts and model theory 15:53:26 ... undated tr urls 15:54:48 gk: suggests to pick up after any PR publication of docs 15:54:53 general agreement 15:55:01 This conference is scheduled to end in 5 minutes; 2 ports must be freed 15:55:15 q? 15:55:16 AOB bwm: TAG last call on arch doc soon, looking for volunteers 15:55:22 item 4 postponed issues 15:55:41 also AOB+, date of next meeting? 15:57:01 bwm suggest people looking at postponed issues http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#futures 15:57:05 and discuss via email 15:57:12 danbri: short & long term 15:57:19 Issues Postponed till a future Version of RDF http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#futures 15:57:21 donm? & afterwards, how often 15:57:33 after get to REC that is 15:57:44 danbri/bwm: unavail next week 15:58:01 This conference is scheduled to end in 2 minutes; 2 ports must be freed 15:58:49 em: no urgency on feedback 15:58:54 bwm: take to email 15:59:01 This conference is scheduled to end in 1 minute; 2 ports must be freed 15:59:05 bwm: maybe one more meeting, possibly not till next year 15:59:10 meeting closed 15:59:12 --- 15:59:13 thanks. 15:59:16 -Emiller 15:59:18 -DanC 15:59:21 -jjc 15:59:25 -FrankM 15:59:39 -ilrt 16:00:03 -GrahamKlyne 16:00:04 SW_RDFCore()10:00AM has ended