IRC log of wstf on 2003-09-29
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 21:30:06 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wstf
- 21:30:16 [shawn]
- agenda?
- 21:49:15 [jon]
- jon has joined #wstf
- 21:49:27 [jon]
- shawn
- 21:49:46 [shawn]
- hi, jon. glad to see you've got IRC access~
- 21:49:57 [Andrew]
- Andrew has joined #wstf
- 21:50:03 [shawn]
- hi, andrew
- 21:50:15 [jon]
- never used this before - glad it works
- 21:50:34 [Andrew]
- hi all - feeling weary jon?
- 21:50:35 [shawn]
- W3C has some cool tools, e.g.:
- 21:50:37 [shawn]
- agenda?
- 21:50:55 [jon]
- just about maintaining it
- 21:51:51 [Andrew]
- imagine how i feel at 1am sat morning (regular EO meeting) ;-(
- 21:52:00 [jon]
- right i'm off to get some coffee talk to you in a bit
- 21:52:09 [jon]
- ah yes much worse!
- 21:56:08 [Andrew]
- shawn - think i have a pointer for you re list numbering
- 21:56:14 [Andrew]
- have alook at http://www.blooberry.com/indexdot/html/tagpages/l/li.htm
- 21:57:32 [Andrew]
- oh. i see everyone is sending in profiles (well 2 folk) - will do later on
- 21:57:57 [Zakim]
- WAI_EOWG(WSTF)6:00PM has now started
- 21:58:04 [Zakim]
- + +1.773.262.aaaa
- 21:58:32 [Zakim]
- +??P1
- 21:59:25 [Zakim]
- +Shawn
- 21:59:26 [Zakim]
- -Shawn
- 22:00:15 [Zakim]
- +Matt
- 22:00:37 [Zakim]
- +Shawn
- 22:00:38 [Zakim]
- -Shawn
- 22:00:52 [shawn]
- doh!
- 22:01:20 [m3mSEA]
- m3mSEA has joined #wstf
- 22:01:41 [Zakim]
- +Shailesh_Panchang
- 22:02:14 [Zakim]
- + +1.408.853.aabb
- 22:02:24 [Zakim]
- +Shawn
- 22:03:02 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, who's here?
- 22:03:02 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +1.773.262.aaaa, ??P1, Shawn, Matt, Shailesh_Panchang, +1.408.853.aabb
- 22:03:04 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see m3mSEA, Andrew, jon, RRSAgent, Zakim, shawn
- 22:03:24 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, aaaa is Carol
- 22:03:24 [Zakim]
- +Carol; got it
- 22:03:37 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, aabb is Michael_Lenz
- 22:03:37 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Lenz; got it
- 22:03:45 [mlenz]
- mlenz has joined #wstf
- 22:04:09 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, ??P1 is Andrew
- 22:04:09 [Zakim]
- +Andrew; got it
- 22:05:09 [shawn]
- agenda?
- 22:05:17 [Zakim]
- + +44.123.520.aacc
- 22:05:29 [shawn]
- zakim aacc is jon
- 22:05:45 [shawn]
- zakim, aacc is jon
- 22:05:45 [Zakim]
- +jon; got it
- 22:05:48 [Zakim]
- -Shailesh_Panchang
- 22:06:08 [Zakim]
- +Shailesh_Panchang
- 22:07:07 [Zakim]
- +??P6
- 22:07:25 [mlenz]
- not me
- 22:07:27 [mlenz]
- sorry
- 22:07:33 [shawn]
- zakim, ??P6 is charmane
- 22:07:33 [Zakim]
- +charmane; got it
- 22:07:51 [shawn]
- slh: shawn says thanks to andrew
- 22:08:13 [Andrew]
- aa: offeres to note take
- 22:08:29 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, mute me temporarily
- 22:08:29 [Zakim]
- sorry, m3mSEA, I do not see a party named 'm3mSEA'
- 22:08:36 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, Matt is really me
- 22:08:36 [Zakim]
- +m3mSEA; got it
- 22:08:40 [m3mSEA]
- zakim, mute me temporarily
- 22:08:40 [Zakim]
- m3mSEA should now be muted
- 22:08:55 [Zakim]
- m3mSEA should now be unmuted again
- 22:09:01 [jon]
- zakim,mute me
- 22:09:13 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 22:09:13 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 22:09:15 [Andrew]
- slh: agenda #1 logistics & t/f functioning
- 22:09:23 [shawn]
- zakim, take up agendum 1
- 22:09:23 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Logistics and general discussion of functioning of Task Force (brief)" taken up [from shawn]
- 22:10:03 [Andrew]
- slh: introductions - verbal, and please post to list
- 22:14:21 [shawn]
- ack jon
- 22:15:10 [shawn]
- zakim, mute jon
- 22:15:10 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 22:15:14 [shawn]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/wstf.html
- 22:16:15 [Andrew]
- slh: questions?
- 22:16:43 [Andrew]
- slh: meeting frequency - weekly?
- 22:17:42 [shawn]
- aa: objectives to redesign... adding WAI documents, need architecture that can handle...
- 22:18:52 [Andrew]
- aa: IA that can scale and evolve - not a static site
- 22:19:33 [Andrew]
- sp: do we need to start with documenting the existing weaknesses?
- 22:20:42 [Andrew]
- slh: we need a "parking lot" for ideas that are not part of the 'current' agenda, eg AA & SP just voiced
- 22:21:00 [jon]
- unless i have anything burning to say i'll keep quiet to avoid buzz
- 22:21:41 [Andrew]
- slh: logistics questions & t/f funcioning & communication
- 22:23:27 [Andrew]
- slh: meeting timing suited early participants - may need to rotate occaisionly to bring others in
- 22:25:15 [shawn]
- action, slh: check with Justin about meetin time
- 22:25:42 [shawn]
- zakim, close agendum 1
- 22:25:42 [Zakim]
- agendum 1 closed
- 22:25:43 [Zakim]
- I see 4 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 22:25:44 [Zakim]
- 2. Schedule and milestones for WAI site redesign (brief) [from shawn]
- 22:27:01 [Andrew]
- slh: soft milestones - march 04 (csun & W3C tech plenary) - opportunities for broader discussion of draft prototypes and informal feedback
- 22:28:16 [Andrew]
- ml: who is coding
- 22:28:42 [Andrew]
- slh: group may code prototype (site re-coding tbd)
- 22:29:32 [mlenz]
- eye
- 22:29:49 [Andrew]
- March 04 - agreed for lo-fidelety prototype
- 22:30:23 [Andrew]
- slh: usability testing offer on existing WAI site
- 22:31:01 [Andrew]
- slh: we already know many issues (sp: already said we should document)
- 22:31:41 [Andrew]
- slh: further usabilty testing on early prototypes to help refine
- 22:32:55 [Andrew]
- slh: existing testing scheduled for late Oct - 28/29 - offer to observe if in area; will be taped, but no highlight tap or broadcast
- 22:34:27 [Andrew]
- slh: also should provide 'some' benchmarking (though not statistically) to show improvements with redesign
- 22:35:09 [Andrew]
- slh: t/g needs to id definition of users and tasks for testing - quickly!
- 22:35:37 [Andrew]
- slh: 2 weeks neeed for recruitment; 1 week for protocol
- 22:36:04 [shawn]
- zakim, close agendum 2
- 22:36:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 closed
- 22:36:05 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 22:36:06 [Zakim]
- 3. Vision for WAI Web site [from shawn]
- 22:37:44 [shawn]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/vision
- 22:38:37 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 22:38:37 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 22:40:22 [Andrew]
- slh: see also March EO meeting http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/0304.html#vision
- 22:40:42 [shawn]
- cc: resource
- 22:41:13 [Andrew]
- cc: site should be a resource
- 22:41:20 [shawn]
- ml: source=point of oringination
- 22:42:44 [Andrew]
- aa: parking lot - pointer to other resources
- 22:42:49 [shawn]
- parking list: pointer to other resources?
- 22:44:21 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 22:44:21 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 22:44:37 [Andrew]
- parking list: definitive source vs welcoming to new-comers may mean parallel IA?
- 22:44:48 [Andrew]
- cs: likes welcoming
- 22:45:23 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 22:45:23 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 22:45:24 [Andrew]
- jd: need to keep folk engaged; needs to be 'state of the art' wrt good design practice
- 22:46:13 [Andrew]
- ml: must include best practice - graphics, layout, presentation (& accessibility)
- 22:46:35 [shawn]
- a ml/mm
- 22:47:31 [shawn]
- aa: re/source for people working in the field
- 22:47:37 [shawn]
- aa: intro for newbies
- 22:48:25 [Andrew]
- mm: 1. what a developer needs 2. what can a pwd use/do
- 22:49:11 [Andrew]
- sp: 1. findability & navigability is crucial
- 22:49:49 [Andrew]
- cc: 1. role model incl how to communicate abut accessibility (not confusing)
- 22:50:24 [Andrew]
- cs: 1. welcoming 2. callouts - pointers for different audiences
- 22:50:55 [Andrew]
- ml: 1. proactive - speaking to user groups with better structure
- 22:50:57 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 22:50:57 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 22:51:47 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 22:51:47 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 22:51:51 [Andrew]
- jd: 1. all above - role model 2. definitive source/resource is crucial
- 22:52:40 [Andrew]
- slh: current site doesn't meet vision = opportunity
- 22:53:17 [Andrew]
- slh: voluteer to craft a 'vision statement'? cc volunteered
- 22:54:03 [Andrew]
- action: all to send to cc/slh examples of good existing vision statements that folk like
- 22:55:32 [shawn]
- corcora1@msu.edu
- 22:55:34 [Andrew]
- cc: corcora1@msu.edu
- 22:55:59 [shawn]
- zaki, who is talking?
- 22:57:02 [Andrew]
- aa: should try and locate website/software-application visions (rather than organisational visions)
- 22:57:19 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 22:57:19 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 22:57:21 [shawn]
- zakim, close agendum 2
- 22:57:21 [Zakim]
- agendum 2 closed
- 22:57:22 [Zakim]
- I see 3 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 22:57:23 [Zakim]
- 3. Vision for WAI Web site [from shawn]
- 22:57:30 [Andrew]
- aa: in a shared office - will keep on mute
- 22:57:34 [shawn]
- zakim, close agendum 3
- 22:57:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 3 closed
- 22:57:35 [Zakim]
- I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- 22:57:36 [Zakim]
- 4. User Analysis [from shawn]
- 22:58:30 [Andrew]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/users
- 23:00:06 [mlenz]
- I would like to see project managers added
- 23:00:30 [shawn]
- aa: add accessibility consultant
- 23:01:52 [Andrew]
- ... and communications managers (following jd's idea)
- 23:03:53 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:03:53 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:03:55 [Andrew]
- XX: managers/administrators/executives is needed as a new group - non technical managers
- 23:04:31 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:04:31 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:05:02 [Andrew]
- jd: decision makers - non ICT; budget responsibility
- 23:05:59 [Andrew]
- another eg is marketing
- 23:06:41 [Andrew]
- ml: product managers is a another example
- 23:06:44 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:06:44 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:07:10 [Andrew]
- slh: maybe group is 'decision makers'?
- 23:07:41 [Andrew]
- cc: other managers may be promoters but not decision makers
- 23:07:57 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:07:57 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:08:46 [Andrew]
- slh: list has 25 user groups - can test with max 8 - so priorities?
- 23:09:46 [Andrew]
- ml: developers and designers MUST be aware and can feed accessibility into upstream
- 23:10:07 [Andrew]
- ml: business owner can feed it downsteam
- 23:10:14 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:10:14 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:10:58 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:10:58 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:11:11 [Andrew]
- jd: developer is important as responsible for implementation (and need good resource)
- 23:12:03 [Zakim]
- +Doyle_Burnett
- 23:13:03 [shawn]
- Zakim, doyle_burnett is Justin
- 23:13:03 [Zakim]
- +Justin; got it
- 23:14:52 [Andrew]
- ml/aa: project owner MUST be key target as they are going to signh off and need to understand accessibility in order to do so
- 23:15:29 [mlenz]
- site needs to be a voice for the disabled
- 23:16:25 [mlenz]
- site needs to articulate the business case for accessibility
- 23:16:54 [shawn]
- slh: add authoring tool folks & user agent folks
- 23:17:11 [mlenz]
- site needs to be the credible resource for the people building the web based products
- 23:18:33 [Andrew]
- will shawn refine priorities and send to list?
- 23:20:11 [Andrew]
- cc: shoud retain pwd as a primary focus - will be very different if not inlcude upfront
- 23:20:50 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:20:50 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:23:00 [AMJA]
- AMJA has joined #wstf
- 23:23:25 [shawn]
- issue: currently we don't have many (any) resources specifically for PWDs who are not members of other groups...
- 23:23:41 [AMJA]
- sorry - irc booted me off temporarily - lost the discusion thread for a few minutes
- 23:24:15 [AMJA]
- can take up notes again - thanks for that capture shwan
- 23:25:18 [AMJA]
- jd: E & O - people who can make a difference and get accessibility on the agenda must be priority
- 23:25:29 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:25:29 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:26:16 [AMJA]
- sp: softawre QA folk should also be included somewhere
- 23:26:39 [AMJA]
- sp: software = website
- 23:26:47 [shawn]
- add to user list: web site evaluators, QA
- 23:27:34 [AMJA]
- sp: should be inlcuded in primary
- 23:27:51 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:27:51 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:27:58 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:27:58 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:28:03 [AMJA]
- ml: pwd should be secondary wrt site objective
- 23:28:12 [AMJA]
- most folk agree
- 23:29:01 [AMJA]
- slh: pwd who are not members of other target groups - where do they fit?
- 23:29:37 [AMJA]
- all agree these are secondary target
- 23:30:31 [AMJA]
- mm: also - no materials targeting this group
- 23:30:36 [m3mSEA]
- mm: I stand aside, since we don't have any of the resources I'm talking about yet.
- 23:32:41 [AMJA]
- background = probably andrew - muted now
- 23:33:49 [AMJA]
- aa: I would like to see marketing/communcations managers
- 23:39:21 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:39:21 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:39:25 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:39:25 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:39:32 [AMJA]
- aa: corporate policy makers different from govt policy makers
- 23:40:15 [AMJA]
- action: folk to group users into primary/secondary/other when list refined by slh
- 23:41:07 [shawn]
- zakim, close agendum 4
- 23:41:07 [Zakim]
- agendum 4 closed
- 23:41:08 [Zakim]
- I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- 23:41:09 [Zakim]
- 5. Usability testing protocol [from shawn]
- 23:41:15 [shawn]
- zakim, sho is making noise?
- 23:41:15 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, shawn.
- 23:41:16 [AMJA]
- slh: matrix - to help us understand the users; also need to develop personas for target users
- 23:41:50 [AMJA]
- aa was typing loudly
- 23:44:02 [AMJA]
- slh: who are the 8 participants? what screening?
- 23:44:34 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:44:34 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:44:44 [AMJA]
- slh: criteria for 8 participoants?
- 23:45:41 [AMJA]
- jd: don't be too specific; dno't need to be accessibility experts; do need some technical experience (so won't be scared by language they will find)
- 23:45:48 [AMJA]
- ml: agrees
- 23:46:09 [AMJA]
- cc: what we ask is more important that who we test
- 23:48:00 [AMJA]
- sp/jd: should include a pwd in user group - maybe a screen reader user
- 23:48:40 [shawn]
- ppts - some technical so not bamboozled
- 23:48:57 [shawn]
- ppts - at least one experienced screen reader user
- 23:49:23 [shawn]
- ppts - at least one high savy Internet (but not necessarily with accessibility)
- 23:49:34 [AMJA]
- cs/jd: some savvy with net (not necesarily accessibility)
- 23:50:43 [shawn]
- ppts - one high level management, decision making
- 23:51:42 [AMJA]
- ppts - one hard-core developer looking for technical support
- 23:52:40 [AMJA]
- nb - one = 'at least one'
- 23:53:06 [jon]
- zakim, mute me
- 23:53:06 [Zakim]
- jon should now be muted
- 23:53:37 [shawn]
- zakim, close agendum 5
- 23:53:37 [Zakim]
- agendum 5 closed
- 23:53:38 [Zakim]
- I see nothing remaining on the agenda
- 23:55:37 [shawn]
- actions?
- 23:55:37 [RRSAgent]
- sees 2 open action items:
- 23:55:37 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: all to send to cc/slh examples of good existing vision statements that folk like [1]
- 23:55:37 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/09/29-wstf-irc#T22-54-03
- 23:55:37 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: folk to group users into primary/secondary/other when list refined by slh [2]
- 23:55:37 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/09/29-wstf-irc#T23-40-15
- 23:56:17 [jon]
- zakim, unmute me
- 23:56:17 [Zakim]
- jon should no longer be muted
- 23:56:47 [AMJA]
- action: lsh to compile criteria for user group for testing and send to list for t/f comment online and next week
- 23:57:45 [AMJA]
- slh: may need to junp into tasks for testing fairly urgently because of timelines
- 23:59:38 [Zakim]
- -Shailesh_Panchang