14:05:40 RRSAgent has joined #rdfcore 14:05:43 action: ericm to update frank's rdfcore email address 14:05:46 Zakim, who's on the call? 14:05:46 On the phone I see Manola, Emiller, Jeremy, +1.850.434.aaaa 14:05:49 +??P19 14:05:55 +JosD 14:06:11 zakim, +1.850.434.aaaa is PatH 14:06:11 +PatH; got it 14:06:28 zakim, +??P19 is Bristol 14:06:28 sorry, ericm, I do not recognize a party named '+??P19' 14:06:32 zakim, ??P19 is Bristol 14:06:32 +Bristol; got it 14:06:40 zakim, Bristol contains Jan, DaveB, Brian, Gk, Danbri 14:06:40 +Jan, DaveB, Brian, Gk, Danbri; got it 14:06:47 zakim, who is here? 14:06:47 On the phone I see Manola, Emiller, Jeremy, PatH, Bristol, JosD 14:06:48 Bristol has Jan, DaveB, Brian, Gk, Danbri 14:06:49 On IRC I see RRSAgent, jjc, Zakim, ericm 14:07:42 dajobe-lap has joined #rdfcore 14:07:44 JosD has joined #rdfcore 14:08:24 AGenda: 14:08:26 1 scribe 14:08:29 =jjc 14:08:32 agenda = http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0196.html 14:08:34 2 Roll Call 14:08:38 Zakim, who's on the call? 14:08:38 On the phone I see Manola, Emiller, Jeremy, PatH, Bristol, JosD 14:08:39 Bristol has Jan, DaveB, Brian, Gk, Danbri 14:09:16 Review agenda 14:09:50 regrets DanC, Patrick, 14:10:18 URI proposal will be taken under 9 next steps 14:10:37 Jos AOB pass criteria for negativ entailment tests 14:10:57 Next telecon, next week. 14:11:10 logger has joined #rdfcore 14:11:17 bwm has joined #rdfcore 14:11:35 Scribe next week will be Graham. 14:11:42 5. Minutes 14:11:46 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 14:11:56 with two corrections 14:12:09 Minutes approved 14:12:41 Completed actions recorded as done 14:12:54 Withdrawn actions OK 14:13:50 Item 8 14:13:56 rdfs is done?? 14:14:11 may be or may be not ... 14:14:28 discussion (em, danbri, bwm) 14:14:41 the rdfs one also describes rdf: ns 14:14:46 continued all four actions 14:15:30 action 2003-08-29#2 perl script will be ready within a week 14:16:22 What needs to be done? 14:16:24 q+ to ask general point about doc updates 14:16:25 Primer: 14:16:48 Frank - I need to make one fix in response to comment, also affiliation update 14:16:50 ack dajobe 14:16:50 dajobe-lap, you wanted to ask general point about doc updates 14:17:08 Dave: what changes should we list? 14:17:27 danbri_dna: full changes by ref? 14:18:01 jjcscribe: i think full changes should be in 14:18:20 em: technically danbri is right, inpractice jjc is right 14:18:54 DECISION 2nd last call WDs will record changes between LC1 and LC2 14:19:02 +Mike_Dean 14:19:06 I quite agree this is the most helpful approach 14:19:16 Changes from intermediate drafts will be highlighted 14:19:49 SYNTAX: minor editorial changes 14:19:54 mdean has joined #rdfcore 14:20:38 ACTION jjc review syntax text on bnode IDs 14:21:06 SCHEMA like daves 14:22:35 pfp's latest complaint http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0339.html 14:25:22 Concepts 14:25:51 discussion of NFC? 14:26:26 peter still appears to be wanting more informative text, but maybe satisfied with normative text 14:26:38 editors are declining to add any informative text 14:26:56 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 14:29:16 Also URI issue - 14:30:20 % is resolved, 14:30:47 ctrl chars - both Peter and Martin say it is a mistake 14:31:06 jjc's text in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0207.html 14:31:12 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 14:32:36 A URI reference within an RDF graph (an RDF URI reference) is a Unicode string 14:32:36 [UNICODE] that 14:32:36 + does not contain any control characters ( #x00 - #x1F, #x7F-#x9F) 14:32:36 + and would produce a valid URI ... 14:33:28 Proposal A that RDF concepts is changed to prohibit controlcharacters in RDF URI References 14:33:40 ACTION Pat ensure that semantics refers to concepts text 14:33:49 no objections, approved 14:37:24 Proposal B see msg 14:37:29 no objections, done 14:37:59 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 14:38:12 ACTION jjc implement A and B 14:38:30 ACTION jjc respond to pfps on URIs, cc martin 14:38:58 Semantics 14:39:24 There is some unclairty in proof appendix, Pat is working on these. 14:40:29 Some of the issues pfps has no said OK but seems to have stopped being unhappy. 14:40:51 Test Cases 14:40:54 not much to do 14:41:11 LBase - some small changes tracking semantics 14:42:19 EDITORS please use TR version of documents to work from 14:42:57 basically: the versions of our docs that were published to w3.org/TR/ have had a number of small fixes by danbri and ericm; please work from those rather than from the material you submitted to danbri and ericm 14:45:24 action bwm check status of last call issue list 14:46:02 hmm, do we make a new LC issues list, zapping the old one? 14:47:46 ACTION bwm s/none/no response/ in last call comments 14:51:24 Discussion about I18N issue 14:51:51 minutes of last week, says "No support for changing design" 14:52:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0195.html 14:52:26 (discussion today was procedural not technical) 14:54:10 ACTION em Poke Michael 14:54:47 (poking on xmlsch-02 not other issues) 14:56:53 Jeremy proposes schedule changed 03 => 02 and 10 => 08 14:58:34 ACTION ericm contact comm to get publication date 14:59:06 daveb does 03 Nov move back, em no 14:59:24 ACTION danbri produce boiler plate for OTD 14:59:29 ^OTD^SOTD 15:00:17 ACTION jjc e-mail webont with 02 Oct comment deadline 15:00:34 ACTION danbri e-mail rdfinterest with 02 Oct comment deadline 15:00:55 ACTION bwm e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2 15:01:01 ^bwm^danbri^ 15:02:15 danbri will need to identify which groups are particularly targeted 15:03:57 ACTION jjc suggest herman sends review as personal comment before webont endorsement 15:04:03 AOB 15:04:21 negative entailment test pass criteria 15:05:02 q+ 15:05:11 q+ to disagree with Jos 15:07:19 Jos worries from WebOnt 15:07:27 ack jjcscribe 15:07:27 jjcscribe, you wanted to disagree with Jos 15:07:37 about rule systems having difficulty about passing 15:08:30 jjc rdf or rdfs rule sets are complete so no problem 15:08:37 path may not be practical 15:08:57 jos I am not satisfied, also datatype entailments 15:09:43 brian suggests note in test document, indicating negative entailments are illustative 15:10:05 pat let's stay silent 15:10:15 josd but the implementation report? 15:12:35 danbri_dna has joined #rdfcore 15:13:01 ACTION path to consider amendments to test cases text considering non=entailments 15:13:11 out of itme 15:13:16 meeting adjourning 15:13:18 -Bristol 15:13:19 -PatH 15:13:23 -Emiller 15:13:26 -JosD 15:13:26 -Jeremy 15:13:27 -Manola 15:13:35 -Mike_Dean 15:13:36 SW_RDFCore()10:00AM has ended 15:13:50 arrrr! ahoy people 15:14:04 RRSAgent, pointer? 15:14:04 See http://www.w3.org/2003/09/19-rdfcore-irc#T15-14-04 15:15:07 Can someone please change perms on irc log? 15:15:55 jjc, i can't get to w3.org from HP wireless LAN 15:15:57 ericm, can you do it? 15:16:07 bwm has joined #rdfcore 15:16:31 http://www.w3.org/2003/09/19-rdfcore-irc is now world 15:24:48 thanks (just the html but that will do) 15:47:02 jjc, not sure why all variants didn't take... 15:47:21 http://www.w3.org/2003/09/19-rdfcore-actions and http://www.w3.org/2003/09/19-rdfcore-irc should now be world 16:14:27 http://www.netimperative.com/cmn/viewdoc.jsp?cat=all&docid=BEP1_News_0000056532 17:56:14 Zakim has left #rdfcore 17:57:11 ericm has left #rdfcore