15:50:50 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webont
15:55:59 <sandro> sandro has joined #webont
15:56:28 <DanC> DanC has changed the topic to: 29 May http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ chair: JimH; scribe: Sandro
15:57:34 <baget> baget has joined #webont
15:57:54 <DanC> agenda + 29May http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0366.html
15:59:32 <Zakim> SW_WebOnt()12:00PM has now started
15:59:36 <Zakim> +Tim_Finin
16:00:13 <sandro> zakim, what is the code?
16:00:13 <Zakim> the conference code is 9326, sandro
16:00:24 <Zakim> +Evan_Wallace
16:00:42 <Zakim> +Sandro
16:01:34 <Zakim> +[INRIA]
16:02:07 <Zakim> +??P22
16:02:11 <Zakim> +DanC
16:02:15 <jjc> jjc has joined #webont
16:02:25 <Zakim> +??P24
16:02:43 <Zakim> +??P25
16:03:02 <Zakim> +??P26
16:03:18 <Zakim> +??P27
16:03:53 <DanC> Zakim, Tim_Finin is JeffH
16:03:53 <Zakim> +JeffH; got it
16:04:08 <Zakim> +[UMD]
16:04:08 <Zakim> +??P29
16:04:09 <Jhendler> Jhendler has joined #webont
16:04:11 <pfps> pfps has joined #webont
16:04:16 <jjc> Zakim, ?P29 is jjc
16:04:16 <Zakim> sorry, jjc, I do not recognize a party named '?P29'
16:04:25 <jjc> Zakim, ??P29 is jjc
16:04:25 <Zakim> +jjc; got it
16:04:33 <Jhendler> zakim, [umd] is hendler
16:04:33 <Zakim> +hendler; got it
16:05:04 <DanC> Zakim, ??P22 is MasahiroH
16:05:04 <Zakim> +MasahiroH; got it
16:05:25 <DanC> ack sandro
16:05:44 <sandro> RRSAgent, pointer?
16:05:44 <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-05-44
16:06:14 <sandro> Jim convenes Meeting
16:06:43 <sandro> Evan_Wallace regrets for last meeting missed.
16:06:44 <nmg> nmg has joined #webont
16:07:19 <DanC> (continued from 8 May, in particular)
16:07:20 <sandro> aciton from last week, on DanC, imports test, should have been "Continued"
16:07:37 <sandro> RESOLVED: ammended minutes from last week accepted.
16:07:45 <sandro> Action Review
16:07:56 <Zakim> +??P30
16:08:05 <DanC> I did some work on integrating implementation feedback/news into http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/rqim.html
16:08:15 <sandro> ACTION: Jim Hendler to report back on implementation feedback.
16:08:25 <sandro> cont
16:08:26 <sandro> ACTION: Jim Hendler and Dan Connolly to compose a response to the LC
16:08:26 <sandro> comment on local and compound keys.
16:08:27 <sandro> cont
16:08:34 <sandro> ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to work on proof for issue 5.26 B1,B2
16:08:41 <sandro> moved to JJC
16:08:50 <sandro> ACTION: Dan Connolly publish XML syntax
16:09:04 <sandro> discussion:
16:09:17 <sandro> DanC: I asked for a change to the abstract.
16:09:37 <sandro> MH: that's fine
16:10:11 <sandro> MH: <question about namespace options>
16:10:17 <sandro> DanC: either way is fine
16:10:25 <sandro> ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider and Jeremy Carroll to discuss solutions to
16:10:32 <sandro> DONE, to be discussed today
16:10:37 <sandro> ACTION: Jeremy Carroll to make changes to test document concerning
16:10:38 <sandro> DONE
16:10:52 <sandro> ACTION: Sandro Hawke to do publishing of Test
16:10:58 <sandro> CONTINUED
16:11:13 <sandro> title page date is 28 may, close date is 27 june
16:11:32 <sandro> DanC: add i18n to your peers list.
16:12:32 <DanC> C.4.2. Concerning rdf:XMLLiteral http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposed-misc-200-xmlliteral#proposed-misc-200-xmlliteral
16:12:35 <sandro> ACTION: Mike Smith and Guus Schreiber will review  proposed changes to
16:12:44 <DanC> ^perhaps that obviates the need for mail, jim?
16:12:50 <sandro> JimH: I dont understand this option.    Mike and Guus not here.
16:12:54 <sandro> CONTINUED
16:13:05 <sandro> ACTION: Jeff will post proposed response
16:13:21 <sandro> DONE
16:13:23 <sandro> ACTION: Mike Smith will pdate issue list 5.06  (in re: imports closure)
16:13:24 <sandro> DONE
16:13:31 <sandro> ACTION: Mike Smith to update issue list 5.20 about synonyms
16:13:37 <sandro> CONTINUED
16:14:20 <sandro> ACTION: Jos de Roo to propose a test based on the example given by peter
16:14:22 <sandro> CONTINUED
16:14:28 <Zakim> +PatH
16:14:31 <sandro> ACTION: Guus to propose a definition for "class description".
16:14:33 <sandro> CONTINUED
16:14:49 <sandro> ACTION: Mike Smith to update the Guide glossary accordingly
16:15:31 <DanC> ACTION DanC: get I18N WG review of last call specs, continued from ~17 years back 1/2;-)
16:16:34 <sandro> JimH: I thought there was a response from Martin....   I can't find it right now.
16:17:02 <sandro> DanC: lets examine all LC comments today
16:17:19 <sandro> JimH: Next telecon is 5 June, normal time and place
16:17:23 <DanC> Zakim, pick a scribe
16:17:23 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ??P30
16:17:29 <DanC> Zakim, pick a scribe
16:17:29 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose jjc
16:17:32 <DanC> Zakim, pick a scribe
16:17:32 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Evan_Wallace
16:17:46 <DanC> Zakim, who is on the phone?
16:17:46 <Zakim> On the phone I see JeffH, Evan_Wallace, Sandro, [INRIA], MasahiroH, DanC, NickG, ZivH, IanH, PeterFPS, hendler, jjc, ??P30, PatH
16:18:09 <DanC> Zakim, ??P30 is CharlesW
16:18:09 <Zakim> +CharlesW; got it
16:18:20 <DanC> Zakim, pick a scribe
16:18:20 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose [INRIA]
16:18:24 <DanC> Zakim, pick a scribe
16:18:24 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose PeterFPS
16:18:28 <sandro> Charles volunteers to scribe in TWO WEEKS.
16:18:36 <sandro> Next Scribe: PFPS
16:18:58 <sandro> JimH: Half of our last call issues overlap the "beer convo"
16:19:04 <DanC> Zakim, who's talking?
16:19:04 <sandro> zakim, agenda?
16:19:04 <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
16:19:05 <Zakim> 1. 29May http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0366.html [from DanC]
16:19:13 <Jhendler> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0349.html
16:19:15 <Zakim> DanC, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Sandro (5%), MasahiroH (29%), hendler (39%), CharlesW (4%)
16:19:31 <sandro> AGENDUM Review of "Beer conversation decisions"
16:19:44 <sandro> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0349.html
16:20:03 <sandro> JJC: we talked about 8 issues, of which the last was casual
16:20:13 <sandro> ... on all of them we were seeing eye-to-eye
16:20:38 <sandro> ... A) intersectionOf semantics
16:20:48 <sandro> ... msg 116
16:20:54 <sandro> ... started as rdf-logic thread
16:21:10 <sandro> ... mismatch between OWL Full semantics and OWL DL semantics
16:21:29 <sandro> ... Peter described two possible fixes; we agreed one was better   
16:22:08 <sandro> ... fix #2 is only an if --> iff & correspondence proof.   fix #1 was broader
16:22:12 <sandro> ... sample test case:
16:22:27 <sandro> ... (prefered one is #2)
16:22:49 <sandro> ... one of John, Mary,   one of John,   one of Mary;   bigger class is union of two smaller classes
16:23:01 <sandro> ... currently that doesn't follow under RDFS semantics
16:23:11 <sandro> PH: really?!
16:23:20 <sandro> PH: Oh, under OWL Full, okay.
16:23:51 <sandro> PFPS: right now Intersection, etc, are syntax.  They only have necessary, not necessary and sufficient conditions.
16:24:05 <sandro> PH, JJC: we don't find the "syntax" part of that comment useful
16:24:21 <sandro> JJC: so one line change to AS&S
16:24:32 <sandro> DanC: section 5.2
16:24:39 <sandro> PH: that sounds like a bug
16:25:02 <sandro> PFPS: it's coherent this way.   this was the original intent
16:25:23 <sandro> JimH: does anyone have a problem with this decision?
16:25:50 <sandro> PFPS: (laughing) this way I have to do all the work!
16:26:31 <sandro> JimH: straw pole on accepting solution #2 from message 116 ?
16:26:40 <sandro> JimH calls the question
16:27:09 <sandro> JJC: not just IntersectionOf, but all the relevant connectives
16:27:14 <DanC> msg 116 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0116.html
16:27:22 <sandro> JimH hears no objections or abstentions.
16:28:07 <sandro> JJC: relevent ones are clearly linked in semantics
16:28:10 <sandro> RESOLVED
16:28:21 <sandro> DanC: is there a test case?   Please add it.
16:28:55 <jjc> ACTION: jjc {a,b} unionOf {a} {b}
16:29:04 <sandro> ACTION Peter Change the documents to reflect this #2 in 116 change
16:29:09 <sandro> ACTION: Peter Change the documents to reflect this #2 in 116 change
16:29:31 <sandro> JJC: B). B1, B2 in OWL DL Syntax
16:29:42 <seanb> seanb has joined #webont
16:29:59 <sandro> ... I've got a sketh proof on a scrap of paper; this is a lot easier after the above fix is done
16:30:41 <Jhendler> ACTION: jjc Send proof sketch of extension to correspondence theorem with B1
16:31:08 <Jhendler> ACTION: pfps review proof sketch of correspondence with B1 B2
16:31:36 <sandro> JimH: I think the WG already agreed we wanted this done.   All set.
16:31:43 <sandro> JJC: C) rdf:LIst decision by RDF Core
16:32:12 <sandro> ... I agreed with Peter that this could be addressed by making the list triple optional in mapping rule
16:33:32 <sandro> [ missed a bit ]
16:33:54 <sandro> ... We think there's an answer here, but I can't promise it
16:34:06 <sandro> JimH: Would Sean's work be affected?
16:34:11 <sandro> JJC: slightly
16:34:56 <sandro> ... "to recognize an unnamed class, look for such-and-such a triple", with the rdf:type triple always optional
16:35:10 <sandro> DanC: I'd like to hear from someone building a syntax checker.
16:35:27 <sandro> JimH: Not clear to me how this gets exposed in RDF/XML syntax
16:35:57 <Jhendler> zakim, who is talking?
16:36:00 <sandro> JJC: It means that you could use rdf:Description in places you might otherwise have owl:Foo
16:36:08 <Zakim> Jhendler, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Sandro (20%), MasahiroH (4%), PeterFPS (15%), hendler (35%), jjc (44%), CharlesW (4%)
16:36:39 <sandro> JJC: it would be interesting to hear from Sean
16:36:44 <sandro> Ian: I can ask him tomorrow
16:37:36 <sandro> JimH: No opposition to JCC's proposed flowchart ("proof works? then... ")
16:37:58 <sandro> Ian steps out to grab Sean
16:38:26 <sandro> JimH: feed back to RDF Core?   
16:38:46 <sandro> DanC: not now at least
16:39:07 <sandro> JJC: D) OWL DL syntax NP complete         #83 and #52 from may
16:39:13 <sandro> ... april #3
16:39:31 <sandro> ... mapping rule for owl equiv classes embeds hamiltonian path problem
16:39:50 <sandro> ... equivClass should instead map to <something>
16:40:06 <sandro> ... "arbitrary connected graphs"
16:40:29 <sandro> PH scares everyone with joke
16:41:25 <sandro> DanC: this falls below my threshhold
16:41:28 <jjc> ACTION: jjc equivalentClass with 4 components and no hamiltonian path
16:41:52 <sandro> test case will be one which is connected but with no Ham. path.
16:42:26 <Zakim> +??P0
16:42:42 <sandro> Zakim, ??P0 is SeanB
16:42:42 <Zakim> +SeanB; got it
16:43:08 <sandro> JJC: To change the mapping rule as in #349(D)
16:43:12 <DanC> 2nd
16:43:24 <sandro> Any objections?  
16:43:26 <sandro> Any Abstain
16:43:29 <sandro> RESOLVED
16:43:57 <sandro> ACTION: Peter put  #349(D) change into S&AS
16:44:18 <sandro> Back to rdf:List issue, with Sean
16:44:51 <sandro> JJC: can we get rid of type node on all blank nodes?   I think so, but haven't proved it yet.
16:45:12 <sandro> ... Does this make your syntax checker harder?
16:45:37 <sandro> Sean: So you recognize using first/rest, instead of type rdf:List ?      I don't think that would be a problem
16:45:53 <sandro> JJC: how about owl:Restriction, ... etc
16:45:58 <sandro> Sean: that's probably okay
16:46:19 <sandro> Sean: the type arc makes it a little easier, but it should still be easy to do
16:46:39 <sandro> Ian: How far is this allowed to stretch?   To all RDF entailment?
16:46:57 <sandro> ...   eg subproperties of onproperty
16:47:03 <sandro> JJC: No, that's outside of DL
16:47:17 <sandro> PH: one application of an rdfs:range 
16:47:31 <sandro> DanC: this should not be looked at as entailment -- just graph stuff
16:47:51 <sandro> JimH: We might need a table of what you check for using what other things.
16:47:56 <sandro> JJC: that would be in the proof
16:48:12 <sandro> JimH: But we'd like something more easy to read, for implementors
16:48:49 <sandro> DanC: We had a proposal for putting in our document instructions on how to put the toothpaste back in the tube, but we decided not to do that.
16:49:05 <sandro> JimH: As an implementor, I want this to be easy to find.   Rules, whatever
16:49:15 <sandro> DanC: I can't separate these issues
16:49:37 <sandro> JJC: The triples tables, from the formal grammar, automatically, ....
16:49:57 <sandro> JimH: Not expecting people to mine doc for the corresponoding unique feature
16:50:12 <sandro> DanC: We are in the unhappy state right now.
16:50:41 <sandro> DanC: We don't have a section which says: "Suppose you have an RDF graph and you want to make an AS out of it, here's what you do: ..."
16:50:56 <sandro> DanC: we only specify the rules AS->RDF
16:51:23 <sandro> JJC: Sean's test on this is really quite good
16:51:40 <sandro> ... We have two OWL syntax checkers already, so maybe that's good enough
16:51:49 <sandro> DanC: Yeah, that's why this was/is okay with me.
16:51:56 <DanC> (hmm... add sean's text to the reference doc? i.e. non-normative, but pretty useful)
16:52:45 <sandro> JJC: WG decision waits for JJC's proof and Peter and Sean reviewing it.
16:53:11 <sandro> JimH: anyone likely to object then?    (hears no comment)
16:53:44 <DanC> http://www.w3.org/2002/12/open-issues?ml=public-webont-comments&range=1&realm=Public
16:54:40 <sandro> DanC: I advise going through LC list now
16:54:52 <sandro> JimH: let's get through JJC's stuff first, quickly. 
16:55:09 <sandro> JJC: E) unnamed individuals
16:55:22 <sandro> ... Cycles in blank nodes for unname indivs, etc.
16:55:38 <sandro> ... Rationale is plausible, but it's too much work at this point
16:55:47 <sandro> ... So we want to "postpone"
16:55:59 <sandro> JimH,DanC: but we need to create the issue to Postpone
16:57:05 <sandro> E) unnamed individuals
16:57:05 <sandro> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0052.html
16:57:05 <sandro> owlsas-rdfcore-bnodes-restrictions
16:57:13 <sandro> Peter and I propose we postpone this issue.
16:57:13 <sandro> Rationale:
16:57:13 <sandro> - the amount of work to do otherwise is large, and is not guaranteed to 
16:57:13 <sandro> succeed.
16:57:13 <sandro> - however the point is a good one and should be reviewed once the community 
16:57:15 <sandro> has more experience.
16:57:21 <sandro>      -- JJC    #349
16:57:46 <sandro> PH: not treated as existentials??
16:58:11 <DanC> (it's now clear to me that we can't do this quickly; somebody should raise the issue and somebody should propose to postpone it)
16:58:19 <sandro> PFPS: I have a niggling worry that it will be more difficult if we allow cycles.   To get rid of that worry, it'll be a lot of work.
16:58:26 <sandro> ... I need a proof.
16:58:35 <sandro> JJC: I concur
16:59:22 <sandro> JimH: I hear the group generally willing to postpone on this
16:59:58 <sandro> JimH: Pat can read when you (JJC) submits to to the WG
17:00:30 <DanC> ACTION JJC: propose response to owlsas-rdfcore-bnodes-restrictions, including new issue and proposal to postpone
17:00:52 <sandro> JJC: F) ambiguity
17:01:19 <sandro> ... comments from RDF Core members, but not officially RDF Core WG
17:01:53 <sandro> DanC: the term "Non-deterministic" should not be scary here
17:02:09 <sandro> JJC: just editorial
17:02:32 <sandro> DanC: Graham's said his was not a real issue
17:02:56 <sandro> DanC: editor clarify as he sees fit
17:03:22 <sandro> (has a proposed reply been written....?  no one knows.  :-)
17:03:30 <seanb> Apologies for dipping in and out, but I have to leave...
17:03:47 <sandro> JimH: Peter, if you wish to make editorial changes in clearing this up, please go ahead.
17:04:03 <sandro> JimH: Sean's reverse-mapping document...
17:04:14 <sandro> ... we'll review, and we'll decide whether to add it
17:04:22 <sandro> Sean: should have more in a couple days
17:04:24 <Zakim> -SeanB
17:05:10 <sandro> JJC: G) OntologyProperty
17:05:16 <sandro> ... this looks like a bug
17:05:51 <sandro> ... How is it different from an AnnotationProperty?       OntologyProperty has built in domain/range constraints.
17:06:24 <sandro> JJC: I;m okay with just deleteing the rdf type  OntologyProperty
17:06:31 <sandro> Peter: I don't care
17:07:04 <sandro> JimH: 2 proposals, (1) drop OP, (2) fix it
17:07:25 <sandro> JJC: I thought there was an issue, but I couldnt find it.
17:07:52 <sandro> JimH: does this bother you Jeff?
17:08:17 <sandro> Jeff: I think Peter came up with OP to express something we needed at one point.  I don't particularly need it.
17:09:16 <sandro> JimH: let's do the best thing for the language
17:09:54 <sandro> JJC: the concept of OP is kind of in S&AS already, so that's why it's named....
17:10:10 <sandro> JimH: I can see OP being useful
17:11:13 <sandro> JimH: PROPOSED: do 349(G)  "peter and I propose that we add an ontologyproperty directive which mirrors the annotationproperty directive in the abstract syntax, with appropriate mapping rules."
17:11:36 <sandro> JimH: any objections?
17:11:44 <sandro> JimH: abstentions?
17:11:47 <sandro> PH, DanC
17:12:12 <sandro> RESOLVED
17:12:54 <sandro> JimH: Sean has proposed backwards mapping....
17:13:02 <sandro> DanC: which doc would it end up in?
17:13:28 <sandro> JimH: Reference, as appendix, would be my guess.
17:14:11 <sandro> ACTION: DanC and Jeremy to review Sean's text for non-normative inclusion into some OWL document
17:14:49 <sandro> ===============
17:15:57 <sandro> JJC: pub of TEST is now DONE
17:16:39 <sandro> JimH: let's postpone the agenda item about presenting owl, it's being dicussed on list.
17:16:41 <sandro> ==============
17:16:59 <sandro> DanC goes through LC comments
17:17:18 <sandro> ACTION DanC: bring up QA review of OWL Semantics with WG
17:18:09 <DanC> Zakim, please pick a victim
17:18:09 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Evan_Wallace
17:18:11 <DanC> Zakim, please pick a victim
17:18:11 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose ZivH
17:18:25 <DanC> Zakim, please pick a victim
17:18:25 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose PeterFPS
17:18:27 <DanC> Zakim, please pick a victim
17:18:27 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Evan_Wallace
17:18:46 <DanC> Zakim, please pick a victim
17:18:46 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose DanC
17:18:48 <DanC> Zakim, please pick a victim
17:18:48 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose [INRIA]
17:19:01 <DanC> Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 22:12:21 -0400 (EDT)
17:19:01 <DanC> From: "Jimmy Cerra" <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
17:19:01 <DanC> To: public-webont-comments@w3.org
17:19:01 <DanC> Message-ID: <000001c31050$3becd230$0100a8c0@drsoong>
17:19:01 <DanC> Subject: rdf:about and owl:sameIndividualAs oddities
17:19:21 <sandro> ACTION PatH: to follow up with that one, it's an educational issue
17:19:52 <sandro> Anton one closed, though it doesnt show that way
17:20:00 <sandro> Lacy is happy
17:20:07 <sandro> Privacy in OWL...
17:20:27 <sandro> [ most people, including scribe cannot see issues list DanC is reading; w3 machines having problems. ]
17:20:35 <sandro> JimH: that's on my list
17:20:45 <sandro> DanC: published subjects
17:20:50 <sandro> JimH: I'll do that one
17:22:32 <sandro> DanC: Is AS&S in error about what's DL and what isnt?
17:22:42 <sandro> Peter: WG decisions are silent about what's in DL
17:22:54 <sandro> DanC: sameAs should be in DL
17:23:00 <sandro> JimH: Second
17:23:41 <sandro> JimH: Peter, please reply to Guus if you're not going to do it.
17:24:23 <sandro> DanC: let's try to close in May as many as we can, to get more help from machine.
17:25:03 <sandro> ACTION JimH: prepare definitive list of LC issues for next telecon
17:25:36 <Zakim> -Evan_Wallace
17:25:37 <Zakim> -PeterFPS
17:25:38 <Zakim> -PatH
17:25:40 <sandro> ADJOURNED
17:25:41 <Zakim> -IanH
17:25:42 <Zakim> -[INRIA]
17:25:43 <Zakim> -JeffH
17:25:44 <Zakim> -jjc
17:25:45 <Zakim> -ZivH
17:25:45 <Zakim> -MasahiroH
17:25:47 <Zakim> -NickG
17:26:54 <sandro> Jim: I like actions separated
17:27:05 <sandro> Dan: minutes as sentences
17:27:22 <sandro> Jim: pointer to IRC for actions, decisions.
17:27:36 <sandro> IRC okay for blow-by-blow.
17:28:31 <sandro> decisions clean
17:29:08 <sandro> plaintext required for minutes, HTML supplement okay
17:29:13 <Zakim> -hendler
17:29:17 <Zakim> -CharlesW
17:29:23 <Zakim> -DanC
17:29:24 <Zakim> -Sandro
17:29:25 <Zakim> SW_WebOnt()12:00PM has ended
17:29:45 <sandro> RRSAgent, help
17:30:29 <sandro> RRSAgent, bye
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> I see 26 open action items:
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jim Hendler to report back on implementation feedback. [1]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-08-15
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jim Hendler and Dan Connolly to compose a response to the LC [2]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-08-26
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider to work on proof for issue 5.26 B1,B2 [3]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-08-34
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Dan Connolly publish XML syntax [4]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-08-50
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Peter Patel-Schneider and Jeremy Carroll to discuss solutions to [5]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-10-25
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jeremy Carroll to make changes to test document concerning [6]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-10-37
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Sandro Hawke to do publishing of Test [7]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-10-52
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mike Smith and Guus Schreiber will review  proposed changes to [8]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-12-35
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jeff will post proposed response [9]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-13-05
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mike Smith will pdate issue list 5.06  (in re: imports closure) [10]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-13-23
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mike Smith to update issue list 5.20 about synonyms [11]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-13-31
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Jos de Roo to propose a test based on the example given by peter [12]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-14-20
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Guus to propose a definition for "class description". [13]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-14-31
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Mike Smith to update the Guide glossary accordingly [14]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-14-49
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanC to get I18N WG review of last call specs, continued from ~17 years back 1/2;-) [15]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-15-31
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: jjc {a,b} unionOf {a} {b} [16]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-28-55
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Peter Change the documents to reflect this #2 in 116 change [17]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-29-09
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: jjc Send proof sketch of extension to correspondence theorem with B1 [18]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-30-41
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: pfps review proof sketch of correspondence with B1 B2 [19]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-31-08
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: jjc equivalentClass with 4 components and no hamiltonian path [20]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-41-28
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Peter put  #349(D) change into S&AS [21]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T16-43-57
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: JJC to propose response to owlsas-rdfcore-bnodes-restrictions, including new issue and proposal to postpone [22]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T17-00-30
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanC and Jeremy to review Sean's text for non-normative inclusion into some OWL document [23]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T17-14-11
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DanC to bring up QA review of OWL Semantics with WG [24]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T17-17-18
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: PatH to to follow up with that one, it's an educational issue [25]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T17-19-21
17:30:29 <RRSAgent> ACTION: JimH to prepare definitive list of LC issues for next telecon [26]
17:30:29 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/29-webont-irc#T17-25-03