ISSUE-55: Section 2.7.2 restates constraints laid out in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP], and almost certainly shouldn't
redundant statements about one-way MEP
Section 2.7.2 restates constraints laid out in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP], and almost certainly shouldn't
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SOAP-JMS Binding specification
- Raised by:
- Eric Johnson
- Opened on:
- 2010-07-16
- Description:
- From email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html
Description:
Section 2.7.2:
There are three "MUST"s, two "SHOULD"s, and one "MAY" that are not
tagged as normative statements.
Problems:
* These statements are not flagged.
* Largely a restatement of [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP]
Proposal:
Replace the entirety of section 2.7.2 with:
The receiving node follows the rules defined in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP].
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-197 on Phil Adams to Create an alternate proposal for issue-55 resolution - due 2010-08-10, closedACTION-205 on Eric Johnson to Apply the resolution for issue 55 - due 2010-08-31, closed- Related emails:
- Applied resolution of issue 55, action 205 (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-30)
- Agenda for the 2010-08-31 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-30)
- Action-197 (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-08-24)
- Agenda for the 2010-08-24 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-23)
- RE: Agenda for the 2010-08-17 conference call (from Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com on 2010-08-17)
- Agenda for the 2010-08-17 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-16)
- Agenda for the 2010-08-03 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-02)
- Agenda for the 2010-07-27 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-26)
- Re: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-20)
- RE: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com on 2010-07-20)
- Re: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-07-20)
- Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-19)
- Re: ACTION 186 - top to bottom review of current copy of spec (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-16)
- ISSUE-55 (redundant statements about one-way MEP): Section 2.7.2 restates constraints laid out in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP], and almost certainly shouldn't [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-07-16)
Related notes:
Opened as per: http://www.w3.org/2010/08/03-soap-jms-minutes.html
Eric Johnson, 16 Aug 2010, 21:38:48Resolution accepted as per: http://www.w3.org/2010/08/24-soap-jms-minutes.html
Eric Johnson, 30 Aug 2010, 23:20:00Application of resolution accepted on 2010-08-31 conf. call:
http://www.w3.org/2010/08/31-soap-jms-minutes.html
Display change log