ISSUE-55: Section 2.7.2 restates constraints laid out in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP], and almost certainly shouldn't

redundant statements about one-way MEP

Section 2.7.2 restates constraints laid out in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP], and almost certainly shouldn't

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SOAP-JMS Binding specification
Raised by:
Eric Johnson
Opened on:
2010-07-16
Description:
From email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html

Description:
Section 2.7.2:
There are three "MUST"s, two "SHOULD"s, and one "MAY" that are not
tagged as normative statements.

Problems:
* These statements are not flagged.
* Largely a restatement of [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP]

Proposal:

Replace the entirety of section 2.7.2 with:

The receiving node follows the rules defined in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP].
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. Applied resolution of issue 55, action 205 (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-30)
  2. Agenda for the 2010-08-31 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-30)
  3. Action-197 (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-08-24)
  4. Agenda for the 2010-08-24 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-23)
  5. RE: Agenda for the 2010-08-17 conference call (from Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com on 2010-08-17)
  6. Agenda for the 2010-08-17 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-16)
  7. Agenda for the 2010-08-03 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-02)
  8. Agenda for the 2010-07-27 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-26)
  9. Re: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-20)
  10. RE: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com on 2010-07-20)
  11. Re: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-07-20)
  12. Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-19)
  13. Re: ACTION 186 - top to bottom review of current copy of spec (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-16)
  14. ISSUE-55 (redundant statements about one-way MEP): Section 2.7.2 restates constraints laid out in [SOAP 1.2 Part 3: One-Way MEP], and almost certainly shouldn't [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-07-16)

Related notes:

Opened as per: http://www.w3.org/2010/08/03-soap-jms-minutes.html

Eric Johnson, 16 Aug 2010, 21:38:48

Resolution accepted as per: http://www.w3.org/2010/08/24-soap-jms-minutes.html

Eric Johnson, 30 Aug 2010, 23:20:00

Application of resolution accepted on 2010-08-31 conf. call:
http://www.w3.org/2010/08/31-soap-jms-minutes.html

Eric Johnson, 7 Sep 2010, 15:50:15

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 55.html,v 1.1 2013-09-16 14:06:36 carine Exp $