ISSUE-46: replyToName has "SHOULD" assertion about where the message should be sent.
replyToName spurious assertion
replyToName has "SHOULD" assertion about where the message should be sent.
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SOAP-JMS Binding specification
- Raised by:
- Eric Johnson
- Opened on:
- 2010-07-12
- Description:
- From email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2010Jul/0013.html
Section 2.2: soapjms:replyToName definition: "Specifies the name of the
destination to which a response message SHOULD be sent".
Problems:
* Not flagged as normative
* Redundant, as Protocol-2008 already indicates that it MUST be used to determine JMSReplyTo.
Proposal:
Change sentence in question to read: "Specifies the name of the destination to which a response message will be sent."
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- RE: Agenda for the 2010-08-17 conference call (from Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com on 2010-08-17)
- Agenda for the 2010-08-17 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-16)
- Agenda for the 2010-08-03 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-08-02)
- Agenda for the 2010-07-27 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-26)
- Re: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-20)
- RE: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from Derek.Rokicki@softwareag.com on 2010-07-20)
- Re: Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from phil_adams@us.ibm.com on 2010-07-20)
- Agenda for the 2010-07-20 conference call (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-19)
- ACTION-194 - apply resolutions to issues 41-46 (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-19)
- ISSUE-47 (topicReplyToName unflagged assertions): topicReplyToName has two unflagged assertions, some inappropriate. [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-07-15)
- Re: ACTION 186 - top to bottom review of current copy of spec (from eric@tibco.com on 2010-07-12)
- ISSUE-46 (replyToName spurious assertion): replyToName has 'SHOULD' assertion about where the message should be sent. [SOAP-JMS Binding specification] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-07-12)
Related notes:
Opened and resolved as per:
http://www.w3.org/2010/07/13-soap-jms-minutes.html
Application of resolution of this issue accepted as per:
http://www.w3.org/2010/08/17-soap-jms-minutes.html
Display change log