ACTION-112 open
Review test cases to identify which ones could have associated WSDL Eric Johnson
2009-09-15 ACTION-108 open
Come up with a more concrete proposal on the wsdl testing Eric Johnson
2009-08-25 ACTION-68 open
Draft words on what you can do with non-normative MEPs like RIO for publication in an FAQ Derek Rokicki
2009-05-29 ACTION-121 open
Make the changes recorded under the proposed resolution for Issue 15 Phil Adams
2009-11-17 ACTION-32 open
Will create at least one additional testcase Eric Johnson
2008-09-16 ACTION-124 open
Reply to Eric's email with a counter-proposal for sections 2.6.1 and 2.6.2 Phil Adams
2009-11-17 ACTION-123 open
Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 17 Mark Phillips
2009-11-17 ACTION-125 open
to make the changes for Issue 18 Mark Phillips
2009-11-17 ACTION-122 open
Make the changes proposed by Eric under issue 16 Phil Adams
2009-11-17 ACTION-84 closed
Reword the assertions 2035, 2039, and 2041 so that they make more sense Roland Merrick
2009-05-12
ACTION-83 closed
Close email thread on LC comments 7,8,9 Roland Merrick
2009-04-28
ACTION-80 closed
Remove point 3 (properties come from JMS URI) from section 2.2 Roland Merrick
2009-04-14
ACTION-81 closed
update the spec. with "jndi-" prefix changes (when we get confirmation from Harald) Roland Merrick
2009-04-21
ACTION-82 closed
Update the spec. with Phil and Eric's changes to contentType Roland Merrick
2009-04-21
ACTION-86 closed
Ask Yves what the best way to record / store the FAQ? Eric Johnson
2009-06-16
ACTION-89 closed
Review the test assertion IDs to see which ones we _really_ need to test Eric Johnson
2009-06-23
ACTION-90 closed
Follow up contacts with CXF to find out timeframes etc. Peter Easton
2009-06-30
ACTION-88 closed
Send contact details to Eric to update the URI scheme Mark Phillips
2009-06-23
ACTION-87 closed
Find out if Axis 2 has an implementation of the SOAP/JMS Binding spec. Phil Adams
2009-06-16
ACTION-79 closed
Review the SOAP-JMS Binding spec to see if any changes are required for new jndi naming scheme Derek Rokicki
2009-04-14
ACTION-85 closed
See whether assertion 2042 can be removed bacause all faults are covered by their own assertion Roland Merrick
2009-05-12
ACTION-76 closed
Change the Binding specification to use \"NON_PERSISTENT\" in 5 places where we use \"NONPERSISTENT\" Roland Merrick
2009-03-31
ACTION-69 closed
Come up with revised URI scheme pass for review next week Eric Johnson
2009-03-17
ACTION-70 closed
Take another pass of the Content Type wording Eric Johnson
2009-03-17
ACTION-67 closed
Redraft words re replyTo and topicReplyTO Derek Rokicki
2009-03-03
ACTION-66 closed
Bring up the additional MEP Derek Rokicki
2009-02-17
ACTION-65 closed
Clarify for content Type Phil Adams
2009-02-17
ACTION-71 closed
Incorporate latest act 65 wordings in spec and email original Last Call commentor Peter Easton
2009-03-17
ACTION-72 closed
Incorporate Derek's text into spec. Roland Merrick
2009-03-24
ACTION-91 closed
Propose a change to Spec. wording to remedy inconsistency in MIME example vs. Protocol-2029 assertion Eric Johnson
2009-07-21
Incorrect example, section C2 ACTION-77 closed
Clarify precedence of URI etc in WSDL 3.4.5 Amelia Lewis
2009-04-07
ACTION-75 closed
Look at Dongbo's last point - what should an implementation do if it does not support a URI variant Phil Adams
2009-03-31
ACTION-74 closed
Examine the wording of the conformance requirements section Roland Merrick
2009-03-31
ACTION-73 closed
Follow up IRI jndi issue after next week with Harald Eric Johnson
2009-03-24
ACTION-78 closed
Chase acknowledgement of all our responses Roland Merrick
2009-04-07
ACTION-94 closed
to reword the protocol-2024 proposal Mark Phillips
2009-07-28
ACTION-111 closed
Investigate the correct syntax for closing the MIME boundary Eric Johnson
2009-09-15
Bad MIME terminating boundary ACTION-113 closed
Discuss UDDI entry wording with IBM UDDI rep. Mark Phillips
2009-09-22
ACTION-110 closed
Apply the resolution for Issue-9 Phil Adams
2009-09-15
ISSUE-9 ACTION-109 closed
Update the specification to reflect the change to Protocol 2021 assertion Mark Phillips
2009-09-15
Protocol-2024 needs restructuring ACTION-107 closed
Regen testing tables etc Phil Adams
2009-08-25
ACTION-114 closed
Apply Resolution For Issue 12 Phil Adams
2009-10-06
Bad MIME terminating boundary ACTION-115 closed
Apply Resolution For Issue 13 Phil Adams
2009-10-06
Extra space in Schema ACTION-119 closed
Try to determine what is normative and how to generate test cases. Eric Johnson
2009-10-27
ACTION-120 closed
Remove the duplication from 2.2.4 Mark Phillips
2009-11-03
ACTION-118 closed
Review the spec for references, and propose resolution Eric Johnson
2009-10-27
ACTION-117 closed
Make the updates for issue 14 Phil Adams
2009-10-20
ACTION-116 closed
Correct the "soap" prefix reference in section 3.4.5 Eric Johnson
2009-10-20
ACTION-106 closed
Propose UDDI FAQ Eric Johnson
2009-08-25
ACTION-105 closed
Apply issue 10 proposal Phil Adams
2009-08-25
redundant assertions 2016 and 2017 ACTION-96 closed
Formulate further FAQ questions Amelia Lewis
2009-07-28
ACTION-97 closed
Formulate further FAQ questions Derek Rokicki
2009-07-28
ACTION-64 closed
Clarify spec about topic replyToName Derek Rokicki
2009-02-17
ACTION-95 closed
Raise a tracking issue for each of the specification changes we have proposed Eric Johnson
2009-07-28
ACTION-93 closed
Propose the revised table to the list Eric Johnson
2009-07-21
requestURI in response message? ACTION-98 closed
Formulate further FAQ questions Phil Adams
2009-07-28
ACTION-99 closed
Edit the FAQ page to add a general structure to the Wiki Eric Johnson
2009-07-28
ACTION-103 closed
Make the Issue-2 changes consistent with Issue-1 Phil Adams
2009-08-18
ACTION-104 closed
reapply the resolution for issue 6 (remove JMS Priority) Phil Adams
2009-08-18
ACTION-102 closed
Update the spec with Eric's proposal for issue 8 Phil Adams
2009-08-18
ACTION-101 closed
Apply 1,2,3,5,6 issue resolutions to spec CVS commit is acceptable Phil Adams
2009-08-11
ACTION-100 closed
Apply Issue-7 resolution to spec CVS commit is acceptable Phil Adams
2009-08-11
ACTION-92 closed
Propose the wording for the change to split 2024 into three testable assertions Mark Phillips
2009-07-21
ACTION-63 closed
Respond to dongbo to say that the spec has been clarified re: IRI scheme jndi requirement Roland Merrick
2009-02-10
ACTION-21 closed
Respond to email on JMS properties in WSDL Eric Johnson
2008-08-19
ACTION-22 closed
raise possible use cases clarification for jndi URI additional parameters mapping to JMS headers Derek Rokicki
2008-08-19
ACTION-20 closed
Write note to a mailing list summarizing the opinion of the group, that WS-Addressing is out of scope, but we understand the question, we will develop FAQ materials. Glen Daniels
2008-08-05
ACTION-19 closed
Write up an answer to the question of WS-Addressing. Bhakti Mehta
2008-11-04
ACTION-17 closed
Work on the XML format for test cases (not glen) Peter Easton
2008-08-05
ACTION-18 closed
Come up with more example text for section 2.2.3.1 or 2.2.2.1 Eric Johnson
2008-08-05
ACTION-23 closed
Review the relevant parts of the XML Schema draft on behalf of SOAP/JMS WG Mark Phillips
2008-09-12
ACTION-24 closed
Present test case message examples with additions styled after peter's suggestions Phil Adams
2008-08-26
ACTION-29 closed
Write up a proposal to differentiate JNDI connection properties in the URI and WSDL Derek Rokicki
2008-09-09
ACTION-30 closed
Write up the options for using TextMessage that we have discussed so that we can identify and discuss the scenarios Eric Johnson
2008-09-09
ACTION-28 closed
Add test case documents and scripts to version control Roland Merrick
2008-09-16
ACTION-27 closed
Examine/update xslt for test cases, once test cases stabilizes Eric Johnson
2008-09-09
ACTION-25 closed
Look at wording that might allow vendor to use TextMessage and not break specifications Phil Adams
2008-08-26
ACTION-26 closed
Incorporate changes into test case proposal, as brought up in 2008/8/26 discussion Phil Adams
2008-09-02
ACTION-16 closed
Write up one or two initial test scenarios - a one-way and request-response Phil Adams
2008-07-29
ACTION-15 closed
Check how we should make the disctinction between normative and non-normative Roland Merrick
2008-07-22
ACTION-6 closed
Write up a test proposal due next week Amelia Lewis
2008-06-03
ACTION-7 closed
Write up a test proposal due next week Phil Adams
2008-06-03
ACTION-5 closed
And Phil will take a first pass of the spec to identify assertions Peter Easton
2008-05-27
ACTION-4 closed
Send information to bhakti about using CVS Roland Merrick
2008-05-20
ACTION-2 closed
Register everyone on the Public Mailing list Yves Lafon
2008-05-13
ACTION-3 closed
Request a weekly bridge for the SOAP-JMS WG Yves Lafon
2008-05-13
ACTION-8 closed
Take a look at the way that WSDL assertions are marked up and to try and apply it to soap-jms spec. Peter Easton
2008-06-10
ACTION-9 closed
And alewis to provide draft methodology due 7/1 Phil Adams
2008-06-17
ACTION-13 closed
Investigate abiguity about "MUST fully support the JMS IRI" and fix where necessary Eric Johnson
2008-07-01
ACTION-14 closed
Add text to say in sction 2.6 you MUST use replyToName and in 2.7 it should say you MUST NOT use it Roland Merrick
2008-07-01
ACTION-12 closed
Write a proposal of the JMS API example text that should appear in each section (2.2.2 & 2.2.23) of the spec. Phil Adams
2008-07-01
ACTION-11 closed
- write up email with nits discovered in the spec during the review for testing Eric Johnson
2008-06-24
ACTION-10 closed
Send mail to the list about the progress so far. Amelia Lewis
2008-06-24
ACTION-31 closed
Create an additional view showing all the features and which test cases exercise the feature Phil Adams
2008-09-16
ACTION-33 closed
Write up a proposal for what to do with jms URI queue and topic proposal. Eric Johnson
2008-09-23
ACTION-53 closed
Provide testcase(s) in properties area Derek Rokicki
2008-12-02
ACTION-54 closed
Send email to secretary general to progress the IETF spec Eric Johnson
2008-12-01
ACTION-52 closed
- make sure everyone has CVS access for creating test cases. Yves Lafon
2008-11-18
ACTION-51 closed
Add a test case. Peter Easton
2008-11-18
ACTION-49 closed
Update URI spec to adopt Alfred's comments and the jndi context parms Eric Johnson
2008-11-03
ACTION-50 closed
Add note for Last Call regarding feedback requested on precedence wordings etc Roland Merrick
2008-11-03
ACTION-55 closed
Look at the relevant specifications e.g. SOAP with Attachments to assess whether SOAP/JMS binding spec. needs the assertions regarding content type Phil Adams
2008-12-09
ACTION-56 closed
Add answer to FAQ on how to use WSA anonymous and JMS ReplyTo Peter Easton
2008-12-23
ACTION-61 closed
Come up with a proposal to make sure we're consistent. Phil Adams
2009-02-03
ACTION-62 closed
Make a proposal to clarify the wording and scope of the (221) jndiContext Parameter property) Peter Easton
2009-02-10
ACTION-60 closed
Respond with email saying that there is no fault. Roland Merrick
2009-02-03
ACTION-59 closed
Send email about LC-04 based on minutes from conf. call of Jan-27 Roland Merrick
2009-02-03
ACTION-57 closed
Raise spec question independently after call Derek Rokicki
2009-01-20
ACTION-58 closed
Respond to Yong-Ping Roland Merrick
2009-02-03
ACTION-48 closed
Look at Destination and terms in general in spec perhaps post LC Roland Merrick
2009-01-20
ACTION-47 closed
Incorporate jndi- props into spec Roland Merrick
2008-10-28
ACTION-38 closed
- put the just agreed-upon changes related to TextMessage into the spec (Phil's write up & Eric's writeup) Roland Merrick
2008-10-14
ACTION-39 closed
Email/phone Oracle/BEA to see if they want to continue to be listed on the URI specification by 2008-10-08 Roland Merrick
2008-10-14
ACTION-37 closed
Write up how to indicate use of text message in WSDL. Peter Easton
2008-10-07
ACTION-36 closed
Write up details around the use of text message, specifically addressing the "encoding" element in XML, the increased size as a consequence of base64 encoding. Eric Johnson
2008-10-07
ACTION-34 closed
Write up specific proposal on how to support TextMessage. Phil Adams
2008-09-23
ACTION-35 closed
Update proposal re context variant and reply to for queue and topic Eric Johnson
2008-09-30
ACTION-40 closed
Write up specific proposal for conformance to address the normative concerns. Roland Merrick
2008-10-14
ACTION-41 closed
Clarify the fault to be returned when the arriving message is neither Bytes or Text message Roland Merrick
2008-10-21
ACTION-45 closed
Tidy up the proposal factoring in Eric's changes and splitting the proposal into 2 parts - URI spec and Binding Derek Rokicki
2008-10-21
ACTION-46 closed
Make changes for name and value attributes and place xml schema as appendix in spec Roland Merrick
2008-10-27
ACTION-44 closed
Create a Schema for the WSDL extensions Mark Phillips
2008-10-21
ACTION-43 closed
Mail the JMS URI draft to the IETF Secretariat mailing list to move the process to the next stage Eric Johnson
2008-11-04
ACTION-42 closed
Clarify the conformance section (1.6) to make it clear that the URI scheme MUST be fully supported in the base protocol (just refer to it once) Roland Merrick
2008-10-21
ACTION-1 closed
(or Yves) Ensure that all Group participants are subscribed to the public list public-soap-jms Philippe Le Hégaret
2008-05-31