ISSUE-17
Advice for representing a duration
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Advanced
- Raised by:
- Paul Downey
- Opened on:
- 2006-02-01
- Description:
Something which crops up from time to time within BT and which was discussed at some length within the Web services Addressing WG* is the representation of a duration. XML Schema provides the xs:duration datatype, but this can be inconvinient for databinding tools, in particular when comparing durations which are partially ordered. e.g is 30 days longer than one month? What advice should we give for representing durations? *http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc73
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-17: Advice for representing a duration (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2006-02-01)
- Re: ISSUE-17: Advice for representing a duration (from Paul.V.Biron@kp.org on 2006-02-02)
- RE: ISSUE-17: Advice for representing a duration (from ajulian@mayo.edu on 2006-02-21)
- RE: ISSUE-17: Advice for representing a duration (from ajulian@mayo.edu on 2006-02-21)
- Minutes from XML Schema Patterns for Databinding call 21 February 2006 (from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-02-22)
- RE: ISSUE-17: Advice for representing a duration (from Paul.V.Biron@kp.org on 2006-02-22)
- Agenda: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding F2F 27-28 February 2006 (from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-02-22)
- Revised Agenda: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding F2F 27-28 February 2006 (from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-02-27)
- Minutes from XML Schema Patterns for Databinding F2F 27-28 Feb 2006 (from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-03-12)
- Minutes: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding F2F 31st July - 1st August 2006 (from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-08-01)
- Minutes: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding F2F 5th-6th October 2006 (from paul.downey@bt.com on 2006-10-07)
Related notes:
2006-08-01: moved to advanced at August 2006 F2F
2006-10-05: we dopn't offer advice on which pattern, beyond grouping and saying basic or advanced