Minutes WS Choreography WG conference call 8 August 2006
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Oct/att-0001/agenda_20061017.txt
IRC log
http://www.w3.org/2006/08/08-ws-chor-irc
1. Roll Call
Yves, Steve, Martin, Monica, Gary
2. Scribe:
Steve
3. Agenda change:
NONE
4. Previous Minutes
1st August 2006
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2006Aug/att-0001/minutes_20060801-00.txt
NEW ACTION on MC to sort out the bugzilla issue. Email from Gary issue 3108 8th August
ref: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2006Aug/0002.html
MINUTES APPROVED
5. Action item review
1. ACTION: Provide examples in primer for issue 1503 of how to use lists/arrays - bounded and unbounded
NO PROGRESS
2. ACTION: Add text in primer to explain interaction lifecycle, and that exchanges are only guaranteed if align=true.
NO PROGRESS
3. ACTION: SRT Describe Connectedness/Strong Connectedness design patterns in CDL
NO PROGRESS
4. ACTION: MC to chase CB on test examples
CHASING
5. ACTION: SRT to follow up with Cambs Univ impl.
NO PROGRESS
6. NEW ACTION: Gary to raise a new issue related to channel passing example
DONE
7. NEW ACTION : Put issue 3105 on the Agenda for next week.
DONE
8. NEW ACTION: SRT keep primer up to date with CR issue resolutions/schema changes.
IN PROGRESS
6. Primer status
NO CHANGE
7. Exit Examples
NO CHANGE
8. Formal semantics status
Conversion is IN PROGRESS
9. Implementations status
1. Pi4 Tech
2. Imperial - are willing and able to do an implementation
3. TrustCom
4. Others ....
NEW ACTION: Remove agenda item 9 from agenda next meeting (MC/SRT)
10. Issues
Issue: Service endpoint projection
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3105
PROPOSAL
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Aug/0024.html
PROPOSAL ACCEPTED. RESOLVED FIXED.
Issue and Proposal: Example in 6.2.3
PROPOSAL:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Aug/0010.html
[No idea what the bugzilla id was for this one]
IT IS http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3588
PROPOSAL ACCEPTED. RESOLVED FIXED.
Issue: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3568
HELD OPEN
Trigger for this to be discussed again is either a proposal or final triage of the outstanding issues.
Issue: It is impossible to compare QNames
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3569
See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Jun/0000.html
NO PROPOSAL
Martin: considering this email, I propose no action
RESOLVED WON'T FIX
Issue: optional query for TokenLocator
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3571
Steve: The 'query' attribute on the token locator forces the user to specify
Steve: implementation details as this field is mandatory. Other parts of the
Steve: spec leave 'implementation details' (such as specifying a WSDL interface
Steve: or conditional expressions) as optional or non-observable.
Steve: A proposal was presented to the WG last week but was not accepted at this time.
Steve: On the basis that we can have a blank XQuery we feel that it can be done a different way.
Steve: Therefore the issue raiser withdraws the proposal and accepts the workaround.
Steve: It was also suggested that maybe we should look at a profile mechanism to support this and
Steve: other issues of abstraction. Call to WG for proposal on profiles.
Issue: The working mode for the enclosed choreography while executing the
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3484
Gary thinks that it is not appropriate for a finalizer to have a block attribute because the
semantics of a finalizer are in supporting a specific pattern and not for supporting concurrent performs.
NEW ACTION: CHAIRS Respond to Jing Li. Response is it does block/wait for the enclosed finalizer block to complete.
11. AOB
12. Next Meeting: 5th Sept 2006