Minutes WS Choreography WG conference call 8 August 2006

Agenda: 
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Oct/att-0001/agenda_20061017.txt
IRC log 
	http://www.w3.org/2006/08/08-ws-chor-irc

1. Roll Call
	Yves, Steve, Martin, Monica, Gary

2. Scribe:	
	Steve

3. Agenda change: 
	NONE

4. Previous Minutes

1st August 2006
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2006Aug/att-0001/minutes_20060801-00.txt
	NEW ACTION on MC to sort out the bugzilla issue. Email from Gary issue 3108 8th August
		ref: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-chor/2006Aug/0002.html
	MINUTES APPROVED

5. Action item review
	1. ACTION: Provide examples in primer for issue 1503 of how to use lists/arrays - bounded and unbounded  
	NO PROGRESS
	2. ACTION: Add text in primer to explain interaction lifecycle, and that exchanges are only guaranteed if align=true.
	NO PROGRESS
	3. ACTION: SRT Describe Connectedness/Strong Connectedness design patterns in CDL
	NO PROGRESS
	4. ACTION: MC to chase CB on test examples
	CHASING
	5. ACTION: SRT to follow up with Cambs Univ impl. 
	NO PROGRESS
	6. NEW ACTION: Gary to raise a new issue related to channel passing example
	DONE
	7. NEW ACTION : Put issue 3105 on the Agenda for next week.
	DONE
	8. NEW ACTION: SRT keep primer up to date with CR issue resolutions/schema changes.
	IN PROGRESS

6. Primer status
	NO CHANGE
	
7. Exit Examples 
	NO CHANGE

8. Formal semantics status
	Conversion is IN PROGRESS

9. Implementations status

	1. Pi4 Tech
	2. Imperial - are willing and able to do an implementation
	3. TrustCom
	4. Others ....

	NEW ACTION: Remove agenda item 9 from agenda next meeting (MC/SRT)

10. Issues

	Issue: Service endpoint projection
			http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3105
	PROPOSAL
			http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Aug/0024.html

	PROPOSAL ACCEPTED. RESOLVED FIXED.

	Issue and Proposal: Example in 6.2.3
	PROPOSAL:
		http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Aug/0010.html
	[No idea what the bugzilla id was for this one]
	IT IS http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3588
	PROPOSAL ACCEPTED. RESOLVED FIXED.

	Issue: Participants without roles, roles without behaviour
			http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3568
			HELD OPEN
	Trigger for this to be discussed again is either a proposal or final triage of the outstanding issues.

	Issue: It is impossible to compare QNames 
			http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3569
	See also: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Jun/0000.html
	NO PROPOSAL
	Martin: considering this email, I propose no action
	RESOLVED WON'T FIX


	Issue: optional query for TokenLocator
			http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3571
	Steve: The 'query' attribute on the token locator forces the user to specify
	Steve: implementation details as this field is mandatory. Other parts of the
	Steve: spec leave 'implementation details' (such as specifying a WSDL interface
	Steve: or conditional expressions) as optional or non-observable.
	Steve: A proposal was presented to the WG last week but was not accepted at this time.
	Steve: On the basis that we can have a blank XQuery we feel that it can be done a different way. 
	Steve: Therefore the issue raiser withdraws the proposal and accepts the workaround.
	Steve: It was also suggested that maybe we should look at a profile mechanism to support this and 
	Steve: other issues of abstraction. Call to WG for proposal on profiles.

	Issue: The working mode for the enclosed choreography while executing the
			http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3484
	Gary thinks that it is not appropriate for a finalizer to have a block attribute because the 
	semantics of a finalizer are in supporting a specific pattern and not for supporting concurrent performs.
	NEW ACTION: CHAIRS Respond to Jing Li. Response is it does block/wait for the enclosed finalizer block to complete.


11. AOB

12. Next Meeting: 5th Sept 2006