Minutes WS Choreography WG conference call 31 January 2006
IRC log: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/31-ws-chor-irc
Attendees:Steve Ross-Talbot, Martin Chapman, Gary Brown, Charlton Barreto, Monica Martin, Yves Lafon
Agenda:
-----------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Jan/att-0017/Agenda20060131-0.txt
1. Role Call
------------
Barreto, Brown, Ross-Talbot, Chapman, Lafon, Martin
Apologies:
2. Confirm scribe
-----------------
Monica
3. Agenda Changes
-----------------
None
4. Minutes of last meeting
---------------------------
TO BE DONE
NEW ACTION: SRT/Post minutes from last meeting.
5. Action item review
---------------------
1. ACTION: Provide examples for issue 1503 of how to use lists/arrays - bounded and unbounded
IN PROGRESS
2. ACTION: Add text to explain interaction lifecycle, and that exchanges are only guaranteed if align=true,
IN PROGRESS
3. ACTION: Add pitfalls sub-section in Advanced Topics section, and include the distributed choice problem
Some progress on exceptions
IN PROGRESS
4. ACTION: SRT to request CG to ask relevant group to provide example of using semantics in CDL
Asked for a resource in 2 weeks or there will be no work done.
Reference: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Jan/0001.html
SRT: We have included a way to include RDF in WS-CDL. We may have planned to put an example in the primer.
If it's not there, it doesn't delay the work.
Chapman: Doesn't impact us moving to CR.
Group agreed that two-week deadline and proceeding forward regardless of input from this group.
AWAITING RESPONSE ....
5. ACTION: SRT Describe Connectedness/Strong Connectedness design patterns in CDL
IN PROGRESS
6. ACTION: Redraft Sections 1, Sections 2, and part of Section 3 for a more natural flow in the text
SRT: Martin asked to review Sections 1-3 when primer is released.
IN PROGRESS
7. ACTION: Ask Marco/Kohei to provide copy of slides (SRT)
DONE
8. ACTION: MC to add gary's issues from his slides into bugzilla
IN PROGRESS
9. NEW ACTION: SRT to send Imperial College slides to WG
DONE
6. Primer status
-----------------
Updated: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2006Jan/att-0019/primer.html
SRT: Updates made are in line with F2F requests. Section 3.2 varies in the example in what we discussed.
Provided a degenerate example, other than it helps us explain choreography. SRT described the simple diagram
that will be included.
Brown: First interaction should be a simple MEP rather than an exception.
NEW ACTION: SRT/Remove causeException in this interaction.
SRT: Describe subsequent sections briefly. Complete example is in Section 3.3.10.
7. Formal semantics status
--------------------------
SRT: Kohei Honda says that we plan to submit the drafts at the beginning of next week. This may be delayed.
8. Implementations status
--------------------------
1. Pi4 Tech
2. Imperial College
3. TrustCom
SRT: Awaiting TrustCom. Imperial College is looking interesting (Howard Foster).
Action: SRT/Check with Foster on implementation and progressing to CR.
Brown: Revisit the reasons for restricting recursion on the perform activity, as I think this makes certain use cases complicated to specify in WS-CDL.
What happens if activities occur outside of the recursion.
Chapman: Will summarize in an email and put in Bugzilla.
NEW ACTIONS Brown: Send summary email.
NEW ACTION: Chapman: Enter into Bugzilla.
9. Talks and papers
-------------------
Barreto: Could present at technical plenary (15 minutes).
Will there be a F2F prior to plenary?
Chapman: It is good idea to spend time on examples and exit criteria. Secondly, is end of Feb appropriate?
This meeting could be informal. We could delay to March 2006.
Barreto: An informal meeting would be fine.
Chapman: Dates will be 23-24 February 2006 in Dublin in informal meeting.
SRT: Can't attend then.
Chapman: The alternative is after the plenary.
Look at future dates and advise.
NEW ACTION: SRT and Chapman/Establish F2F date for spring 2006.
10. AOB
----------
NONE
11. Next Call
-----------
7th Februrary 2006