Minutes WS Choreography WG conference call 7 December 2004
To review and process editorial comments from section from 2.5.3 to end of document comments will be relative to an ed draft delivered by cob pst on 3rd December.
Dec 3rd version at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Dec/att-0004/cdl_v1-editors-dec03-2004-XML-sent.pdf
Charlton Barreto scribed
IRC log at: http://www.w3.org/2004/12/07-ws-chor-irc
Comments on document
Gary's comment: Section 2.5.3 - Composing: Remove paragraph - "The OPTIONAL Choreography-Notation within the perform element....." - This is no longer relevant as this element has been removed.
Nick mentioned this is a pdf generation error and choreography-notaion is present in the syntax.
Agreed to leave as is.
Charltons proposal on ws-addressing: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Dec/0008.html
Steve is scribing until charlton has done.
WS-Addressing text is the next proposal/change
Charlton point out that key text is as follows:
WS-Addressing can be used to convey the reference and correlation
information for normalizing expanded channelVariable information into
an uniform format that can be processed independently of transport or
Proposed addition: WS-Addressing is still in rpogress and we shall review our requirements against any ongoing work in the WS-Addressing WG
PROPOSAL from charlton above with amendment is adopted.
Greg's comments reviewed: all editorial, accepted
Charlton's comments reviewed: except for addition of section 7 for WS-Addressing, all editorial
Section 7 additions: add a further statement as to the ongoing, fluid nature of WS-Addressing effort
ACTION: Charlton to resubmit WS-Addressing language with the additional statement
Yves to provide language w.r.t. XInclude for tomorrow
ACTION: Yves (with SRT's help if needed) to get XInlcude text to Nick by 10:00am PST
Also waiting on SRT for some text.
Clarifications for endpoint and global model
ACTION: SRT to do word smithing (see email from Greg)
Tony: explicitly allowing short-circuit evaluations of boolean conditions
SRT: Don't feel comfortable adding or changing things of this scale at this point - without more time to evaluate it
Agreed to move on from this item
Tony's next comment: Description of timeout functions - does not cover 'complete' condition
Nick: Good catch - it was an oversight
Group agrees to the change
Tony's next comment (#3): Add "If no finalizers..." to the end of Section 2.4.8
Group agrees to the change
Tony's comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Dec/0014.html
SRT's comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Dec/0013.html
Gary's comments at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Dec/0010.html
Tony's comment on section 2.4.8 re: enables/enabled
Group passes on this for now
Tony's comment on 2.4.10
SRT: Let's take this suggestion - moving the information to the primer
who supports this suggestion?
Martin: Let's accept Tony's proposal
Tony's next comment: Update references to UDDI to refer to the OASIS specs
Group accepts the change
Tony's next question: ns prefixes for CDL elements
Harmonising for consistency
Martin: Any other comments?
Tony: Section 3, "Example" - leave it empty?
SRT: Yes, we agreed to leave it empty
Martin: We need to update the list of editors
Martin: Based on the current active membership
Yves: Per W3C we don't remove editors
Yves: Should update reference to CommerceOne, but can retain David's name
ACTION: Yves to investigate whether we can add "formerly of" for David's CommerceOne affiliation
Tony: Nick, have we fixed the diagramme in section 1?
Nick: Yes - we have updated it
Martin: All editorial items to be closed by COB PST tomorrow.
Martin: Would like to see final document before it is released as a LC document
SRT: 10-15 minute call to review this
Martin: Meeting Friday to review this?
Yves: We can have statement from WG now
ACTION: Yves to organize a call on friday 18h CET, 9am PST
Martin: Post PDF and MS DOC to archives
Chairs: Excellent work, all