IRC log of ws-cg on 2002-04-30

Timestamps are in UTC.

[hugo]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2002Apr/0005.html
Regrets: David
Scribe: Jonathan
-----
2. Review actions
[JMarsh]
(Hugo chairs in David's absence)
[hugo]
DONE: ACTION: Hugo to call the link "Calendar"
DONE: ACTION: Jonathan to send date to Hugo to be inserted into calendar
ACTION: Hugo to add Sept f2f to calendar
DONE: ACTION: Chris to confirm f2f date with WSAWG
ACTION: Chris to sed reminder about Nov f2f dates and location to WSAWG
ACTION: Eric to have RDF-core, WebOnt, and? review SOAP Data Model, determine initial assessment as to whether it is 2" or 2mi apart from their DLG model and channel that feedback through a single point of contact [CONTINUED]
ACTION: Eric to provide XMLP with name of that contact by Friday [CONTINUED]
DONE: ACTION: Chris & Jonathan: propose usage scenarios and glossary plan to their WGs
-----
3. Report from XML CG
-----
4. Update on f2f dates
[JMarsh]
CF: Still soliciting feedback on Nov dates.
CF: Looks Ok so far...
[hugo]
Dates: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-cg/2002Apr/0007.html
[JMarsh]
Hugo: AC meeting is the following week in Cambridge.
JM: looking at east coast.
JM: Desc group didn't have a problem with the monday holiday, either.
-----
5. Semantic Web review of SOAP data model.
EM: Asked individuals to review. Hasn't asked the group, since the section in question is still undergoing discussion in XP.
EM: Would have prefered to have a WD to look at, but understands the last call push.
EM: Hasn't recieved direct editorial comments yet, expects to in the next week or so.
EM: When the section locks down, I will get formal review from the group. I will be the point man.
CF: Data model isn't changing. Latest editors draft is ready to go out.
EM: When do you go out?
CF: After moratorium (couple, three weeks)
hugo: Conformance parts like test suite still need a couple of weeks.
[em]
-> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Apr/0355.html
[JMarsh]
EM: Didn't think the data model was locked down because of the above message.
CF: Serialization root isn't really an issue, unlikely to change things. Thinks the issue just goes away.
CF: What's in the doc (modulo editorial tweaks) is the last call.
EM: Wants to balance resources, needs assurance that it is stable.
CF: It is.
EM: Serialization root is not an issue?
CF: No, doesn't think so. Looks like a moot point.
EM: OK, so I'll go ahead.
CF: David wants an early heads-up to see if there is a _big_ problem or not.
EM: Has a set of preliminary comments, would you like them now or should we wait till we get them all?
CF: Rough comments earlier would be better.
CF: If we can know something mid-next week that would be good.
EM: Will send preliminary comments, and solicit more reviewers.
hugo: Are you sending mail to XP stating that you are the point man?
EM: Wants action item in the CG minutes to reference.
-----
6. Requirements doc review
CF: What kind of review does the Desc want?
JM: Now is a good time, doc is 90% done.
JM: What about arch requirements?
CF: Good to get some review, although the doc is still in progress.
CF: Next draft may be a "last call".
-----
hugo: Ext groups notified.
JM: Will get the WG to schedule formal review from other groups.
-----
7. June FTF details.
CF: Saw some mail from Exchangeur.
hugo: Logistics page has been updated.
hugo: Oops, hasn't been. David will probably do something soon.
-----
8. XML CG member confidential?
hugo: XML CG is member confidential.
Agreed that we will keep XML CG reports confidential.
Raw IRC log is confidential, pruned minutes will be available publicly.
-----
9. Next meeting
hugo: May 14th. Hugo won't be available. Will ask Philippe or David B to represent him.
[hugo]
RRSAgent, what actions?
[RRSAgent]
I see 4 action items:
ACTION: Hugo to add Sept f2f to calendar [1]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/04/30-ws-cg-irc#T17-08-10
ACTION: Chris to sed reminder about Nov f2f dates and location to WSAWG [2]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/04/30-ws-cg-irc#T17-09-19
ACTION: Eric to have RDF-core, WebOnt, and? review SOAP Data Model, determine initial assessment as to whether it is 2" or 2mi apart from their DLG model and channel that feedback through a single point of contact [CONTINUED] [3]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/04/30-ws-cg-irc#T17-10-29
ACTION: Eric to provide XMLP with name of that contact by Friday [CONTINUED] [4]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/04/30-ws-cg-irc#T17-10-41
[Zakim]
WS_WSCG()1:00PM has ended
[hugo]
Zakim, please excuse us
RRSAgent, please excuse us