ISSUE-98: SMIL or EMMA-like representation of time?
SMIL or EMMA-like representation of time?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EmotionML
- Raised by:
- Marc Schröder
- Opened on:
- 2009-11-02
- Description:
- http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/emotionml/#ISSUE-98
Is the SMIL clock value syntax too complicated and should be replaced by simple milliseconds as used in EMMA? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [emo] EmotionML draft: section on relative timing removed (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-03-15)
- [emma] subgroup call tomorrow Dec 10th (from johnston@research.att.com on 2009-12-09)
- [emo] Issue-96 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2009-11-24)
- [emo] Issues in EmotionML (updated to tracker numbering scheme) (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-11-06)
- ISSUE-98 (EMO-29): SMIL or EMMA-like representation of time? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)
Related notes:
We settled for EMMA-like representations for absolute time, and media fragment URIs for the <link> tags, see http://www.w3.org/2010/03/03-multimodal-minutes.html
Marc Schröder, 15 Mar 2010, 09:47:44Display change log
