ISSUE-96: Redundancy of timestamps with EMMA?

Redundancy of timestamps with EMMA?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
EmotionML
Raised by:
Marc Schröder
Opened on:
2009-11-02
Description:
http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/emotionml/#ISSUE-96
Check potential redundancy of timestamps with Timestamps in EMMA.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [emo] EmotionML draft: section on relative timing removed (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-03-15)
  2. [emma] subgroup call tomorrow Dec 10th (from johnston@research.att.com on 2009-12-09)
  3. R: [emo] Minutes - 2 December 2009 (from oltramari@loa-cnr.it on 2009-12-04)
  4. Re: [emo] Minutes - 2 December 2009 (from ashimura@w3.org on 2009-12-04)
  5. RE: [emo] Minutes - 2 December 2009 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2009-12-03)
  6. [emo] Minutes - 2 December 2009 (from ashimura@w3.org on 2009-12-03)
  7. [emo] Agenda for call on Wednesday 2 December (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-11-30)
  8. [emo] Issue-96 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2009-11-24)
  9. [emo] Issues in EmotionML (updated to tracker numbering scheme) (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-11-06)
  10. ISSUE-96 (EMO-27): Redundancy of timestamps with EMMA? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)

Related notes:

We settled for EMMA-like representations for absolute time, and media fragment URIs for the <link> tags, see http://www.w3.org/2010/03/03-multimodal-minutes.html

Marc Schröder, 15 Mar 2010, 09:47:18

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 96.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:51:03 ted Exp $