ISSUE-40: Define MMI profile for scxml as IM language
Define MMI profile for scxml as IM language
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Authoring
- Raised by:
- Jim Larson
- Opened on:
- 2007-06-19
- Description:
- Does MMI require a special scxml authoring profile? Should there be a way to
cause certain lifecycle events to be handled/generated automatically?
Alternatively, is scxml a sufficient IM language without extensions? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [all] minutes MMI call September 19, 2011 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2011-09-20)
- minutes, main call March 14 (from Jim.Barnett@alcatel-lucent.com on 2011-03-14)
- ISSUE-109 (EMO-40): Proper content for section 'Use with other Namespaces' [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)
- Re: [emo] Issues in EmotionML (from ashimura@w3.org on 2009-10-31)
- [emo] Issues in EmotionML (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-10-30)
- Re: [emma] resolution of open issues in issue tracker (from ashimura@w3.org on 2007-10-31)
- [emma] resolution of open issues in issue tracker (from johnston@research.att.com on 2007-10-29)
- ISSUE-40: Define MMI profile for scxml as IM language [Authoring] (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-06-19)
Related notes:
Discussion at F2F Somerset (14 June, PM1): the MMI profile is not part of the MMI architecture but it might be worth considering in the wider MMI context
Ingmar Kliche, 14 Jun 2010, 17:43:34Display change log
