ISSUE-25: Some better notion of status or progress of an issue
Some better notion of status or progress of an issue
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- Issue Tracker
- Raised by:
- Michael Bodell
- Opened on:
- 2006-10-16
- Description:
- At our face to face we talked about how there are a number of status values an
issue could have including some like (exact titles and status values need work):
Unreviewed - someone has claimed this is an issue but the group hasn\'t talked
about it.
Open - the group agrees this is an issue but has no suggested resolution and no
one assigned to work on it
Assigned - An individual has been assigned this issue to work on (probably be
good to have a way of specifying who this issue is)
Rejected - The group reviewed the issue and deemed it invalid
Deferred - The group reviewed the issue and deemed it unnecessary to deal with
at the current time
Proposed resolution - There exists a proposed resolution the group needs to
discuss and approve
Resolved - The group has agreed on a solution
Applied - The solution the group has agreed upon has been applied into the
correct specification
Some of these may be too detailed or too few catagories and individual groups or
products may wish to define their own statuses. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-94 (EMO-25): Position on a timeline for externally linked objects [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)
- Re: [emo] Issues in EmotionML (from ashimura@w3.org on 2009-10-31)
- [emo] Issues in EmotionML (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-10-30)
- ISSUE-25: Some better notion of status or progress of an issue [Issue Tracker] (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2006-10-16)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
