ISSUE-212: Should we add some kind of high res timestamp as in http://w3c-test.org/webperf/specs/HighResolutionTime/?

Should we add some kind of high res timestamp as in http://w3c-test.org/webperf/specs/HighResolutionTime/?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
EMMA 1.1
Raised by:
Opened on:
2012-10-18
Description:
This is too fine-grained for human input, and probably not worth going to the trouble of standardizing for the few edge cases like sensor input.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [emma] subgroup minutes 110812 (from johnston@research.att.com on 2012-11-08)
  2. [f2f] Minutes Thursday PM1, PM2 (from ashimura@w3.org on 2012-11-02)
  3. [emma] minutes October 18, 2012 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2012-10-18)
  4. ISSUE-212: Should we add some kind of high res timestamp as in http://w3c-test.org/webperf/specs/HighResolutionTime/? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-10-18)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 212.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:50:56 ted Exp $