ISSUE-204: mc specific assertions for cancel

mc specific assertions for cancel

State:

CLOSED

Product:

MMIArchLLC

Raised by:

James Barnett

Opened on:

2012-06-25

Description:

From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:27:57 +0200
Message-ID: <bj5nxs7sg2fifcdgt99f99uo.1338488588567@email.android.com>
To: www-multimodal@w3.org

Hey there,

What is the difference between assertion 178 (a modality component MUST return a CancelResponse event in response to a CancelRequest) and assertion 24 (CancelResponse MUST be sent by the modality component as a response to the CancelRequest)?

Dirk

i Dirk,
We've discussed your question in the Working Group, and we agree with your
suggestion that test assertions 178 (a modality component MUST return a
CancelResponse event in response to a CancelRequest) and assertion 24
(CancelResponse MUST be sent by the modality component as a response to the
CancelRequest) are basically duplicates. We plan to remove assertion 24 and
republish the Implementation Report Plan.
Since we are tracking all comment threads at this point, please let us know
by June 15 if this resolution is acceptable, otherwise we will assume that
you agree with our decision (but it is very helpful to have an explicit
response).
Best regards,
Debbie Dahl, MMI WG Chair

From: Dr. Dirk Schnelle-Walka <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:01:24 +0200
Message-ID: <w4wt09kkmjvff8ad2jkp5amd.1339434009370@email.android.com>
To: Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
Cc: www-multimodal@w3.org

Hey Debbie,

Yes, this solution is acceptable.

Dirk

Deborah Dahl

DISPOSITION=ACCEPTED
ACCEPTANCE=EXPLICIT

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: updated arch spec and DoC (from ashimura@w3.org on 2012-07-17)
2. updated arch spec and DoC (from Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com on 2012-07-09)
3. ISSUE-204: mc specific assertions for cancel [MMIArchLLC] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-25)

Related notes:

Display change log