ISSUE-175: Emotion vocabularies should not use custom mechanism

Emotion vocabularies should not use custom mechanism

State:

CLOSED

Product:

EmoLCC

Raised by:

Marc Schröder

Opened on:

2011-04-13

Description:

Subject: Vocab Namespaces?
Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:33:09 +0000
Resent-From: www-multimodal@w3.org
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:30:20 +1000
From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
To: www-multimodal@w3.org

In the Emotion Markup Language (EmotionML) 1.0 (W3C Working Draft 7 April 2011) - why don't you use namespaces for vocab terms? (which is the more common approach, with QNAMES, or even CURIES)

So the example (just before section 2.2.2) would be:

<emotion xmlns:big6="http://www.w3.org/TR/emotion-voc/xml#big6">
<category name="big6:sadness" value="0.3"/>
<category name="big6:anger" value="0.8"/>
<category name="big6:fear" value="0.3"/>
</emotion>

And, of course, that namespace can be defined at the top-level and reused elsewhere...

Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. [emo] Minutes of today's emotion call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-07-20)
2. Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2011-06-28)
3. Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-22)
4. RE: [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from paolo.baggia@loquendo.com on 2011-06-21)
5. [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-21)
6. [emo] Minutes of emotionml call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-15)
7. [emo] minutes from EmotionML call 1/6/2011 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2011-06-07)
8. Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2011-06-01)
9. Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-06-01)
10. Re: [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from ri@semanticidentity.com on 2011-06-01)
11. [emo] Response to your comment on the W3C EmotionML LCWD (ISSUE-175) (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-05-30)
12. [emo[ Some new information for the discussion on namespaces-for-referring-to-vocabularies (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-05-17)
13. [emo] Minutes May 4, 2011 (from cpeter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de on 2011-05-04)
14. ISSUE-175: PUBLIC: Vocab namespaces? [EmoLCC] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)

Related notes:

Display change log