ISSUE-172: Should the reference from EmotionML spec to Vocabularies document be normative? If so, change Vocab doc into W3C Note

Should the reference from EmotionML spec to Vocabularies document be normative? If so, change Vocab doc into W3C Note

State:
CLOSED
Product:
EmotionML
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-04-13
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Fwd: [emo] minutes of today's call (from ashimura@w3.org on 2012-02-29)
  2. [emo] minutes - 13 April 2011 (from ashimura@w3.org on 2011-04-13)
  3. ISSUE-172: Should the reference from EmotionML spec to Vocabularies document be normative? If so, change Vocab doc into W3C Note (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-04-13)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 172.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:50:53 ted Exp $