ISSUE-167: What should be the status of the recommended vocabularies?

What should be the status of the recommended vocabularies?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

EmotionML

Raised by:

Marc Schröder

Opened on:

2010-11-10

Description:

If part of the spec, they are static; if we put them somewhere on the MMI web space, we can change them over time.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. [emo] minutes of today's call (March 02, 2011) (from cpeter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de on 2011-03-02)
2. Re: [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from ashimura@w3.org on 2011-03-02)
3. [emo] Agenda for EmotionML call (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-02-28)
4. [emo] minutes 2011/2/16 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2011-02-16)
5. [emo] Discussion needed: Where to put our 'recommended' vocabularies? (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2011-01-14)
6. Re: [emo] minutes (from cpeter@igd-r.fraunhofer.de on 2010-12-09)
7. [emo] minutes (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2010-12-08)
8. ISSUE-167: What should be the status of the recommended vocabularies? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-11-10)

Related notes:

Display change log