ISSUE-143: ADD: need a place to keep track of input parameters (process-parameters)
ADD: need a place to keep track of input parameters (process-parameters)
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EMMA 1.1
- Raised by:
- Michael Bodell
- Opened on:
- 2010-06-15
- Description:
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2010Apr/0034.html, issue 6, discussed at Somerset f2f.
some parameters should be in EMMA, but for other modalities could have different parameters. Could have some kind of container to contain parameters. could have elements under "container" with value of parameters.This format should be standardized. "recocontextblock" is relevant to input and output. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [emma] minutes December 15, 2011 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2011-12-15)
- [emma] minutes September 22, 2011 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2011-09-22)
- [emma] proposal for process parameters (ISSUE-143) (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2011-09-07)
- [emma] minutes June 9, 2011 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2011-06-09)
- [emma] minutes Sept. 16, 2010 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-09-23)
- [emma] EMMA minutes August 12, 2010 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-08-12)
- ISSUE-143: need a place to keep track of input parameters [EMMA] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-15)
Related notes:
from the June 2011 f2f Gender, age, etc.,seem like a relatively low priority, but they might be useful and don't seem too hard to specify. Emotion, on the other hand, should be specified with EmotionML. The other question is should we define an extensibility mechanism, so that we can handle other attributes, especially ones that might come up in other modalities?
MJ: Incorporated and extended Debbie's text on emma:parameters 092011
Michael Johnston, 21 Sep 2011, 13:12:04Display change log
