ISSUE-140: grammar should be able to be child of other elements besides <emma>
grammar should be able to be child of other elements besides <emma>
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EMMA 1.1
- Raised by:
- Michael Bodell
- Opened on:
- 2010-06-15
- Description:
- discussed in Somerset f2f, issue 3 in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2010Apr/0034.html
It is useful to know which grammars were active during a specific recognition.
This is useful in analyzing multiple turns, regression testing, and tuning. How do we represent the other active grammars for a recognition (other than the one that produced the result)? you could say that every grammar was active that was in the list of grammars for an input. could use "grammar-ref" to designate the grammar that matched. Could have a <grammars> element to contain active grammars (either uri or inline) and maybe an attribute "matched" with boolean values. This needs to be handled for dialogs and multiple recognizers. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [emma] minutes October 21, 2010 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-10-21)
- [emma] minutes Sept. 16, 2010 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-09-23)
- [convapps workshop] summary of MMI discussion of use cases (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-09-10)
- [emma] minutes July 1, 2010 (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-07-01)
- ISSUE-140: grammar should be able to be child of other elements besides <emma> (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-15)
Related notes:
This issue is closed. There is a mismatch between the title text for the issue and the particular
issue described, which is how to indicate which grammars are active. We have extended the EMMA 1.1
spec draft with a new element grammar-active that contains a list of the active grammars. We chose to keep grammar as a child of emma.
Display change log
