ISSUE-14: [cr] extend ir document with comment requirements
[cr] extend ir document with comment requirements
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EMMA
- Raised by:
- Michael Johnston
- Opened on:
- 2006-09-26
- Description:
- Propose extending IR document to indicate that implementers are required to give
comments if they don\'t implement a feature --> This is critical in determining
whether a feature is not implemented because it is not useful or simply does not
apply to the particular kind of input addressed in a specific implementation.
- Discussed in EMMA call 9/27/06
- Concern that requiring comments will make
document too much like a compliance check
- Vendors may not want to indicate why they
do not have a feature in a public facing document - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-83 (EMO-14): Exaggerated confidence values? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)
- Re: [emo] Issues in EmotionML (from ashimura@w3.org on 2009-10-31)
- [emo] Issues in EmotionML (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-10-30)
- ISSUE-14: [cr] extend ir document with comment requirements [EMMA] (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2006-09-26)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
