ISSUE-136: In the vocabulary definition for unipolar vs. bipolar scales, is the neutral point on the scale always predictable from the type of scale? Think of some examples.

In the vocabulary definition for unipolar vs. bipolar scales, is the neutral point on the scale always predictable from the type of scale? Think of some examples.

State:
CLOSED
Product:
EmotionML
Raised by:
Opened on:
2010-05-26
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [emo] Issues for EmotionML 1.1 (from enrico.zovato@loquendo.com on 2011-03-16)
  2. [emo] EmotionML vocabulary definition syntax: Task force suggestion (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-08-25)
  3. [emo] Minutes for EmotionML call on 26 May 2010 (from Felix.Burkhardt@telekom.de on 2010-05-26)
  4. ISSUE-136: In the vocabulary definition for unipolar vs. bipolar scales, is the neutral point on the scale always predictable from the type of scale? Think of some examples. (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-05-26)

Related notes:

A more solid way of dealing with scales may be the definition of landmarks, as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2010Oct/0023.html

Marc Schröder, 18 Oct 2010, 08:50:44

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 136.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:50:50 ted Exp $