ISSUE-128: Should user-defined strings be in attribute values rather than element names?

Should user-defined strings be in attribute values rather than element names?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
EmotionML
Raised by:
Kazuyuki Ashimura
Opened on:
2010-02-03
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [emo] Revised EmotionML syntax (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-04-14)
  2. Re: [emo] EmotionML validation, namespaces vs. HTML5, and element names vs. attribute values (from ashimura@w3.org on 2010-02-04)
  3. RE: [emo] EmotionML validation, namespaces vs. HTML5, and element names vs. attribute values (from dahl@conversational-technologies.com on 2010-02-03)
  4. [emo] EmotionML validation, namespaces vs. HTML5, and element names vs. attribute values (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-02-03)
  5. ISSUE-128: Should user-defined strings be in attribute values rather than element names? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-03)

Related notes:

This issue becomes obsolete through the adoption of the revised EmotionML syntax as described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2010Apr/0029.html

Marc Schröder, 14 May 2010, 09:07:48

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 128.html,v 1.1 2017/02/13 15:50:49 ted Exp $