ISSUE-110: Schema language for validating EmotionML
Schema language for validating EmotionML
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- EmotionML
- Raised by:
- Marc Schröder
- Opened on:
- 2009-11-02
- Description:
- http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/emotionml/#ISSUE-110
The choice of a suitable schema language depends on the required expressive power. The schema language must allow for the verification of both attribute values (for <category>) and child element names (for <dimensions>, <appraisals> and <action-tendencies>) in a given set, which is either identified using the set attribute or using QNAMES. - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-73 on Marc Schröder to Contact Chris Lilley about Schema validation of custom vocabularies - due 2009-11-25, closed- Related emails:
- [emo] Revised EmotionML syntax (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-04-14)
- Re: [emo] Progress on Schema validation of custom vocabularies (from schroed@dfki.de on 2010-02-01)
- Re: [emo] Progress on Schema validation of custom vocabularies (from schroed@dfki.de on 2010-01-25)
- [emo] Progress on Schema validation of custom vocabularies (from schroed@dfki.de on 2010-01-25)
- [emo] Minutes of today's call (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-11-18)
- [emo] Issues in EmotionML (updated to tracker numbering scheme) (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-11-06)
- ISSUE-110 (EMO-41): Schema language for validating EmotionML [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)
Related notes:
The issue was resolved in a principled way in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-mmi-wg/2010Apr/0029.html -- the vocabulary-dependent values will be verified by the emotion engine, not the schema language, so XML Schema will be fully sufficient for EmotionML. closing the issue.
Marc Schröder, 7 May 2010, 13:47:40Display change log