ISSUE-100: Timing details: onset, hold, decay?

Timing details: onset, hold, decay?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

EmotionML

Raised by:

Marc Schröder

Opened on:

2009-11-02

Description:

http://www.w3.org/2002/mmi/Group/emotionml/#ISSUE-100
Is it important to provide for explicit elements or attributes to annotate onset, hold and decay phases? Here's an example for a possible syntax:

<emoml:timing>
<emoml:onset start="00:00:01:00" duration="00:00:04:00" />
<emoml:hold start="00:00:05:00" duration="00:00:02:00" />
<emoml:decay start="00:00:07:00" duration="00:00:06:00" />
</emoml:timing>

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. [emo] Issues for EmotionML 1.1 (from enrico.zovato@loquendo.com on 2011-03-16)
2. [emo] EmotionML draft: section on relative timing removed (from marc.schroeder@dfki.de on 2010-03-15)
3. [emma] subgroup call tomorrow Dec 10th (from johnston@research.att.com on 2009-12-09)
4. [emo] Issues in EmotionML (updated to tracker numbering scheme) (from schroed@dfki.de on 2009-11-06)
5. ISSUE-100 (EMO-31): Timing details: onset, hold, decay? [EmotionML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-11-02)

Related notes:

Display change log