W3C

Results of Questionnaire Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft?

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.

This questionnaire was open from 2007-11-02 to 2007-11-09.

55 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

  1. Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft?
  2. Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" specification as a W3C Working Draft as well?

1. Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft?

Shall we release HTML 5 as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, the co-chairs (Dan Connolly and Chris Wilson) will choose between v1.310 (Nov 1 03:11:43 2007 UTC) and any later revisions from the editors this week.

See also Results of a recent survey which shows considerable support for publication.

If you're not familiar with the process of Working Draft publication, see the list of W3C working drafts, section 7.4.1 First Public Working Draft of the Process document, and the heartbeat requirement.

Section 3.3 Consensus in the W3C process defines consensus as a "substantial number" in support of a proposal and no formal objections. In this survey, you may indicate disagreement without formally objecting. An individual who registers a Formal Objection should cite technical arguments and propose changes that would remove the Formal Objection. Please put your arguments (or a pointer to your arguments) in the rationale field.

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, agree 43
Abstain 4
No, disagree 5
Formally Object 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Release "HTML 5" specification as a W3C Working Draft?RationaleComments
Google, Inc. (Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>) Yes, agree
Opera Software AS (Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>) Yes, agree
Mitsue-Links Co., Ltd. ( <>) Abstain There's "Call for Comments" version of HTML 5 released by WHATWG in Oct. 26 (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/2007-10-26/multipage/). Why not releasing that revision from HTML WG too?
Apple, Inc. ( <>) Yes, agree
Disruptive Innovations (Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>) Yes, agree
Member Access for Invited Experts and TAG
Mozilla Foundation (David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>) Yes, agree
Microsoft Corp. (Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>) No, disagree We have not had the discussion yet of whether everything in the current HTML5 spec is within our current charter. I believe that may have Patent Policy implications.
International Webmasters Association (IWA) (Pasquale Popolizio <p.popolizio@webprofession.com>) Yes, agree
W3C Invited Experts
Sander van Lambalgen (Sander van Lambalgen <w3c@have-skill.com>) Yes, agree
Dylan Smith (Dylan Smith <qstage@cox.net>) Abstain
Michael Puls II (Michael Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Marc Drumm (Marc Drumm <mdrumm@wcupa.edu>) Yes, agree
Terry Morris (Terry Morris <MorrisW3C@gmail.com>) Yes, agree Fulfills the heartbeat requirement and informs the public.I'm concerned about the number of attributes related to accessibility that are being dropped from HTML -- including accesskey, scope, headers, and summary.
Theresa O'Connor (Theresa O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>) Yes, agree
Jason Lefkowitz (Jason Lefkowitz <jason@jasonlefkowitz.net>) Yes, agree A Working Draft would help catalyze discussion and move the process forward.
Daniel Schattenkirchner (Daniel Schattenkirchner <schattenkirchner.daniel@gmx.de>) Yes, agree
Rick Mans (Rick Mans <rickmans@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Dannii Willis (Dannii Willis <curiousdannii@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Thomas Broyer (Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@ltgt.net>) Yes, agree
Doug Wright (Doug Wright <douglas.wright@pre-school.org.uk>) Yes, agree
Marghanita da Cruz (Marghanita da Cruz <marghanita@ramin.com.au>) Yes, agree
Philip Taylor (Philip Taylor <excors@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Marek Pawlowski (Marek Pawlowski <marekp.w3c@gmail.com>) Yes, agree Lot of work has been done. Let's inform people about it. Feedback is very important.
Raphael Champeimont (Raphael Champeimont <almacha@almacha.org>) Yes, agree
Stephen Axthelm (Stephen Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>) Yes, agree
Ben Boyle (Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Robert Marshall (Robert Marshall <rdm@rdmsoft.com>) Yes, agree
Michaeljohn Clement (Michaeljohn Clement <mj@mjclement.com>) Yes, agree
Philip TAYLOR (Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>) Formally Object No, we have not yet agreed the Design Principles. Without those, the
specification has no formal basis for existence, and premature
publication could jeopardise the reputation of the Working Group.
Dominik Tomaszuk (Dominik Tomaszuk <deres@o2.pl>) No, disagree I agree with Laura Carlson, Gregory Rosmaita, Philip TAYLOR and Roy Fielding's rationale.
Shunsuke Kurumatani (Shunsuke Kurumatani <kurumatani.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>) Yes, agree
Brad Fults (Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Shawn Medero (Shawn Medero <smedero@uw.edu>) Yes, agree Much like my feelings about the Design Principles we need get these documents out into the public for broader discussion and awareness.
Arthur Jennings (Arthur Jennings <arthur.jennings@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
David Håsäther ( <>) Yes, agree
James Graham (James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>) Yes, agree
Cameron McCormack (Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>) Yes, agree Good to finally get something published to show progress outside the group, regardless of whether all of the details in the document are agreeable to everyone yet.

The WHAT WG recently published a stable version of the spec (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/2007-10-26/multipage/). It may be worth having our published version be based on that revision, to avoid confusion.
Julian Reschke (Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) Abstain
Jens Oliver Meiert (Jens Oliver Meiert <jens@meiert.com>) Yes, agree
Steve Faulkner (Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Roy Fielding (Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>) No, disagree This draft has almost nothing to do with HTML. It is a treatise on browser behavior. That is a fine standard to have, but deserves a different title so that the folks who just want to implement HTML can do so without any of this operational/DOM nonsense.
Asbjørn Ulsberg (Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>) Yes, agree
Geoffrey Sneddon ( <>) Yes, agree
John-Mark Bell (John-Mark Bell <jmb@netsurf-browser.org>) Abstain
Weston Ruter (Weston Ruter <westonruter@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Josh Lawton (Josh Lawton <w3c@joshlawton.com>) Yes, agree
Ben Millard (Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>) Yes, agree Fulfils the Heartbeat Requirement and makes clear what we are working on to the public.
Laura Carlson (Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>) No, disagree I agree with Gregory Rosmaita, Philip TAYLOR and Roy Fielding's rationale.
Dimitri Glazkov (Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>) Yes, agree Releasing the working draft would put more eyeballs on the document and hopefully provide more insight on the next steps.
Erik van Kempen (Erik van Kempen <erikvankempen@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Bill Mason (Bill Mason <billm@accessibleinter.net>) Yes, agree
Sean Fraser (Sean Fraser <wileyluxe@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Gregory Rosmaita (Gregory Rosmaita <gregory.rosmaita@gmail.com>) No, disagree i agree with the comments of Roy Fielding that, as currently drafted, the HTML5 working draft is really quote a treatise on browser behavior unquote. i am also concerned by other respondents' suggestion that the WHAT WG's recently published (26 October 2007) quote stable version unquote of the spec (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/2007-10-26/multipage/) be adopted wholesale by the HTML WG. while the WHAT WG is free to do what it wants, i -- and others -- have repeatedly asked that the W3C draft reflect the input of the HTML WG, not input to the WHAT WG -- if WHAT WG members want to comment on the W3C Draft, they should feel free to do so, but it is madness to have 2 competing drafts, especially one that is revised outside of W3C space and simply ported to W3C space based on revisions to which the HTML WG has little knowledge. the WHAT WG's draft does NOT reflect the consensus of the HTML WG and should not be imposed on the HTML WG. therefore, i am objecting to the release of the HTML5 Working Draft UNTIL such time as the editors and chairs acknowledge that there is only 1 draft of HTML5 that reflects (or is supposed to reflect) the work of the HTML WG so far. until the parallel development of the HTML5 draft is considered just another suggestion stream, rather than a call for consensus on a fait accompli, i will continue to vote against the release of the HTML5 working draft as a W3C draft, until there is but one draft from which EVERYONE, within and without the W3C, can work with the assurance that the issues they raise and the suggestions they make are based upon a single iteration of HTML5. feedback is, indeed, critical, but only if that feedback is shared with the HTML WG and informs the content of the document identified as a W3C working draft.until the issue of the competing drafts is resolved, i cannot support release of the HTML5 draft. i am voting "no" rather than "formally objecting" because i trust the chairs and the Hypertext Coordination Group/Team to clarify the issue of parallel tracking and duplication of efforts once and for all before the end of the year, and i am not convinced that the best way to achieve that end is to formally object to the release of the W3C working draft of HTML5 -- i am convinced, however, that if the status quo persists, the HTML WG will never reach consensus, and that the number of formal objections lodged in straw polls and in posts to the chairs, editors, and list will grow exponentially.

2. Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" specification as a W3C Working Draft as well?

Shall we release HTML 5 differences from HTML 4 along with the HTML 5 specification as a W3C Working Draft? Specifically, revision 1.33 of 2007-10-22 11:17:20 plus any publication-related changes (e.g. status section, typos, broken links) agreed by the editor (Anne van Kesteren) and one of the co-chairs (Dan Connolly, Chris Wilson).

Summary

ChoiceAll responders
Results
Yes, agree 45
Abstain 5
No, disagree 2
Formally Object 1

(2 responses didn't contain an answer to this question)

Details

Responder Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" specification as a W3C Working Draft as well?RationaleComments
Google, Inc. (Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>) Yes, agree
Opera Software AS (Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>) Yes, agree
Mitsue-Links Co., Ltd. ( <>) Yes, agree
Apple, Inc. ( <>) Yes, agree
Disruptive Innovations (Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>) Yes, agree I think this document is hyper-important and should absolutely be released formally if HTML5 is released itself as a WD. I don't care about WD status, or a Note or whatever.
Member Access for Invited Experts and TAG
Mozilla Foundation (David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>) Yes, agree Seems like this would help publicize the main points of what the group is doing.
Microsoft Corp. (Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com>) Yes, agree
International Webmasters Association (IWA) (Pasquale Popolizio <p.popolizio@webprofession.com>) Yes, agree
W3C Invited Experts
Sander van Lambalgen (Sander van Lambalgen <w3c@have-skill.com>) Yes, agree
Dylan Smith (Dylan Smith <qstage@cox.net>) Abstain
Michael Puls II (Michael Puls II <shadow2531@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Marc Drumm (Marc Drumm <mdrumm@wcupa.edu>) Yes, agree
Terry Morris (Terry Morris <MorrisW3C@gmail.com>) Yes, agree Is a helpful introduction to the differences between HTML 4 and HTML 5.
Theresa O'Connor (Theresa O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>) Yes, agree
Jason Lefkowitz (Jason Lefkowitz <jason@jasonlefkowitz.net>) Yes, agree A differences document would help focus the discussion on the places where new work has been done.
Daniel Schattenkirchner (Daniel Schattenkirchner <schattenkirchner.daniel@gmx.de>) Yes, agree
Rick Mans (Rick Mans <rickmans@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Dannii Willis (Dannii Willis <curiousdannii@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Thomas Broyer (Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@ltgt.net>) Yes, agree
Doug Wright (Doug Wright <douglas.wright@pre-school.org.uk>) Yes, agree
Marghanita da Cruz (Marghanita da Cruz <marghanita@ramin.com.au>) Yes, agree
Philip Taylor (Philip Taylor <excors@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Marek Pawlowski (Marek Pawlowski <marekp.w3c@gmail.com>) Yes, agree Lot of work has been done. Let's inform people about it. Feedback is very important.
Raphael Champeimont (Raphael Champeimont <almacha@almacha.org>) Yes, agree
Stephen Axthelm (Stephen Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>) Yes, agree
Ben Boyle (Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Robert Marshall (Robert Marshall <rdm@rdmsoft.com>) Yes, agree
Michaeljohn Clement (Michaeljohn Clement <mj@mjclement.com>) Yes, agree
Philip TAYLOR (Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>) Formally Object See above.
Dominik Tomaszuk (Dominik Tomaszuk <deres@o2.pl>) Abstain
Shunsuke Kurumatani (Shunsuke Kurumatani <kurumatani.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>) Yes, agree
Brad Fults (Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>) Abstain I'm not sure this document is useful in its current form, especially in light of the existing non-W3C version that already exists. It might be prudent to wait until after HTML5 has reached candidate rec status.
Shawn Medero (Shawn Medero <smedero@uw.edu>) Yes, agree This document is rather good shape, it was written well to begin with and the editing process seemed to go rather smoothly judging from the list traffic. I think this document will help dispel a lot of myths about HTML 5.
Arthur Jennings (Arthur Jennings <arthur.jennings@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
David Håsäther ( <>) Yes, agree
James Graham (James Graham <james@hoppipolla.co.uk>) Yes, agree
Cameron McCormack (Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>) Yes, agree
Julian Reschke (Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>) Abstain
Jens Oliver Meiert (Jens Oliver Meiert <jens@meiert.com>) Yes, agree
Steve Faulkner (Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Roy Fielding (Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>) Yes, agree
Asbjørn Ulsberg (Asbjørn Ulsberg <asbjorn@ulsberg.no>) Yes, agree
Geoffrey Sneddon ( <>) Yes, agree
John-Mark Bell (John-Mark Bell <jmb@netsurf-browser.org>) Abstain
Weston Ruter (Weston Ruter <westonruter@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Josh Lawton (Josh Lawton <w3c@joshlawton.com>) Yes, agree
Ben Millard (Ben Millard <cerbera@projectcerbera.com>) Yes, agree Is a helpful introduction to HTML5's drafted feature set.
Laura Carlson (Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>) No, disagree I agree with Gregory Rosmaita and Philip TAYLOR's rationale.
Dimitri Glazkov (Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>) Yes, agree This is a necessary supplement to the HTML5 working draft.
Erik van Kempen (Erik van Kempen <erikvankempen@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Bill Mason (Bill Mason <billm@accessibleinter.net>) Yes, agree
Sean Fraser (Sean Fraser <wileyluxe@gmail.com>) Yes, agree
Gregory Rosmaita (Gregory Rosmaita <gregory.rosmaita@gmail.com>) No, disagree until we know what HTML5 actually IS, how can we compare it to HTML4x?

More details on responses

  • Google, Inc.: last responded on 2, November 2007 at 22:25 (UTC)
  • Opera Software AS: last responded on 3, November 2007 at 00:38 (UTC)
  • Mitsue-Links Co., Ltd.: last responded on 4, November 2007 at 23:57 (UTC)
  • Apple, Inc.: last responded on 5, November 2007 at 16:37 (UTC)
  • Disruptive Innovations: last responded on 6, November 2007 at 16:23 (UTC)
  • Member Access for Invited Experts and TAG: last responded on 8, November 2007 at 14:53 (UTC)
  • Mozilla Foundation: last responded on 8, November 2007 at 23:24 (UTC)
  • Microsoft Corp.: last responded on 9, November 2007 at 21:24 (UTC)
  • International Webmasters Association (IWA): last responded on 9, November 2007 at 22:59 (UTC)
  • W3C Invited Experts: last responded on 10, November 2007 at 04:54 (UTC)
  • Sander van Lambalgen: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Dylan Smith: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Michael Puls II: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Marc Drumm: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Terry Morris: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Theresa O'Connor: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Jason Lefkowitz: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Daniel Schattenkirchner: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Rick Mans: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Dannii Willis: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Thomas Broyer: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Doug Wright: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Marghanita da Cruz: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Philip Taylor: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Marek Pawlowski: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Raphael Champeimont: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Stephen Axthelm: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Ben Boyle: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Robert Marshall: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Michaeljohn Clement: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Philip TAYLOR: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Dominik Tomaszuk: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Shunsuke Kurumatani: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Brad Fults: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Shawn Medero: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Arthur Jennings: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • David Håsäther: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • James Graham: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Cameron McCormack: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Julian Reschke: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Jens Oliver Meiert: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Steve Faulkner: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Roy Fielding: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Asbjørn Ulsberg: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Geoffrey Sneddon: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • John-Mark Bell: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Weston Ruter: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Josh Lawton: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Ben Millard: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Laura Carlson: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Dimitri Glazkov: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Erik van Kempen: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Bill Mason: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Sean Fraser: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)
  • Gregory Rosmaita: last responded on 18, May 2009 at 13:21 (UTC)

Non-responders

The following W3C Members and Invited Experts have not answered the questionnaire:

  1. Cable Television Laboratories Inc: Bob Lund <b.lund@cablelabs.com>,Clarke Stevens <c.stevens@cablelabs.com>
  2. Pearson plc: Suzanne Taylor <Suzanne.Taylor@pearson.com>,Greg Davis <greg.davis@pearson.com>
  3. HTML5 Converged Technology Forum: Hyejin Lee <hjlee@html5forum.or.kr>
  4. The Paciello Group, LLC: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>,Patrick Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
  5. Sony Corporation: Tatsuya Igarashi <Tatsuya.Igarashi@sony.com>,Motomasa Futagami <mares@paoz.net>,Norifumi Kikkawa <norifumi.kikkawa@jp.sony.com>,Kazuhiko Takabayashi <kazuhiko.takabayashi@jp.sony.com>,Shinya Maruyama <Shinya.Maruyama@jp.sony.com>
  6. Alibaba Group: Dapeng Liu <max.ldp@alibaba-inc.com>,Shaohang Yang <shaohang.ysh@alibaba-inc.com>
  7. W3C Staff:
  8. Orange: Mohammed DADAS <mohammed.dadas@orange.com>,Arnaud Braud <arnaud.braud@orange.com>,Pascal Perrot <pascal.perrot@orange.com>
  9. Netflix Inc.: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>,Mick Hakobyan <mhakobyan@netflix.com>
  10. JS Foundation: Brian Kardell <hitchjs@gmail.com>
  11. Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB): Sally Cain <sally.cain@rnib.org.uk>
  12. Comcast Corporation: Mark Vickers <mark_vickers@comcast.com>,Jeremy LaCivita <jeremy.lacivita@comcast.com>,David Mays <david_mays@comcast.com>,Michael Chen <michael_chen@comcast.com>,Patrick Ladd <Pat_Ladd2@comcast.com>,Glenn Deen <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>,John Riviello <john_riviello@comcast.com>,Richard Grzeczkowski <richard_grzeczkowski@comcast.com>,Cory Heslip <cory_heslip@comcast.com>,Ali C. Begen <ali_begen@comcast.com>
  13. British Broadcasting Corporation: David Evans <david.evans@rd.bbc.co.uk>
  14. Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI): Jack Jansen <jack@cwi.nl>,Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
  15. European Broadcasting Union (EBU-UER): Jean-Pierre EVAIN <evain@ebu.ch>,Bram Tullemans <tullemans@ebu.ch>
  16. MovieLabs: James Helman <jhelman@movielabs.com>,Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
  17. Rakuten,Inc.: Kunio Ito <kunio.ito@mail.rakuten.com>
  18. Educational Testing Service: Markku Hakkinen <mhakkinen@ets.org>,Jason White <jjwhite@ets.org>
  19. ERICSSON: Magnus Olsson <magnus.olsson@ericsson.com>,Per-Erik Brodin <per-erik.brodin@ericsson.com>
  20. NIC.br - Brazilian Network Information Center: Reinaldo Ferraz <reinaldo@nic.br>,Nathalia Sautchuk Patrício <nathalia@nic.br>
  21. Tencent: smallni ding <smallniding@tencent.com>,Min Ren <minren@tencent.com>,HENGBING LIU <herbertliu@tencent.com>
  22. Baidu, Inc.: Eva Lingyun Jing <jinglingyun@baidu.com>,Xingrong Guo <guoxingrong@baidu.com>,Rayi Lei <leiyi@baidu.com>,jiexuan gao <gaojiexuan@baidu.com>,Xiaoqing Yang <yangxiaoqing@baidu.com>,Xuejian Li <lixuejian@baidu.com>,Zuncheng Yang <yangzuncheng@baidu.com>,Qianglong Zheng <zhengqianglong@baidu.com>,Zhou Shen <shenzhou@baidu.com>,Duoyi Wu <wuduoyi@baidu.com>,Zheng Jia <jiazheng@baidu.com>,Weifeng Feng <fengweifeng@baidu.com>,Damin Hu <hudamin@baidu.com>,Yang Liu <liuyang12@baidu.com>,Zhixing Lei <leizhixing@baidu.com>,Honggang Tang <tanghonggang@baidu.com>,Kefeng Li <buaadallas@gmail.com>,Xu Ma <maxu@baidu.com>,Junzhong Liu <liujunzhong@baidu.com>,lei wang <wanglei03@baidu.com>,Yiling Gu <guyiling@baidu.com>,Zefa Xiong <xiongzefa@baidu.com>,shanglin chen <chenshanglin@baidu.com>,Ping Wu <wuping02@baidu.com>,Bin Chen <chenbin01@baidu.com>,Lei Wang <wanglei@baidu.com>,Pengcheng Guo <guopengcheng@baidu.com>,Xie Jianhui <xiejianhui@baidu.com>,Yujie Jiang <jiangyujie@baidu.com>,Chris Wong <huanghoujin@baidu.com>,Yiliang LIU <liuyiliang@baidu.com>,mingqiang zhang <imcnan@gmail.com>,xueliang fan <fanxueliang@baidu.com>,Yue Min <minyue@baidu.com>,Min Li <limin04@baidu.com>,yaolong wang <wangyaolong@baidu.com>,Tao Liang <liangtao01@baidu.com>
  23. Yandex: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
  24. Hachette Livre: Gabino Alonso <gabinovincent@gmail.com>,Sam Langdon <sam.langdon@hachette.co.uk>
  25. Web3D Consortium: Don Brutzman <brutzman@nps.edu>
  26. IBM Corporation: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>,Masatomo Kobayashi <mstm@jp.ibm.com>
  27. Igalia: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
  28. SAP SE: Mark Crawford <mark.crawford@sap.com>,Stefan Schnabel <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
  29. Huawei: Wu Chou <wu.chou@huawei.com>,GANG LIANG <gang.liang@huawei.com>,Alex Giladi <alex.giladi@huawei.com>,Milan Patel <Milan.Patel@huawei.com>,Hao Jing <jh.jinghao@huawei.com>
  30. Deque Systems, Inc.: Preety Kumar <preety.kumar@deque.com>,John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
  31. Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA): Eric VonColln <eric.voncolln@navy.mil>
  32. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation: Akira Torii <Torii.Akira@bp.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,Yusuke Yokosuka <Yokosuka.Yusuke@bx.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,Seiji Okumura <Okumura.Seiji@bc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>,Eiji Yamamoto <Yamamoto.Eiji@db.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
  33. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI): Kangchan Lee <chan@w3.org>,Jonathan Jeon <hollobit@etri.re.kr>,WonSuk Lee <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>,jongyoul Park <jongyoul@etri.re.kr>
  34. Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp. (NTT): Kensaku KOMATSU <kensaku.komatsu@gmail.com>,Youichi Takashima <takashima.youichi@lab.ntt.co.jp>
  35. Fraunhofer Gesellschaft: Stefan Kaiser <stefan.kaiser@fokus.fraunhofer.de>,Stefan Pham <stefan.pham@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
  36. National Association of Broadcasters: So Vang <svang@nab.org>
  37. Adobe Systems Inc.: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>,Joe Steele <steele@adobe.com>,Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>,Raul Hudea <rhudea@adobe.com>,Raghavan Gurumurthy <raghavan@adobe.com>,Mayank Kumar <mayankk@adobe.com>,Dragos Georgita <dgeorgit@adobe.com>,Christopher Bank <cbank@adobe.com>,Kevin Streeter <kstreete@adobe.com>,Michael Thornburgh <mthornbu@adobe.com>,Glenn Eguchi <geguchi@adobe.com>
  38. Newphoria Corporation: Futomi Hatano <futomi.hatano@newphoria.co.jp>
  39. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.: Youngsun Ryu <ysryu@samsung.com>
  40. Verimatrix, Inc.: Petr Peterka <ppeterka@verimatrix.com>,Tom Handal <thandal@verimatrix.com>,Niels Thorwirth <nthorwirth@verimatrix.com>
  41. Skynav, Inc.: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
  42. MITRE Corporation: Stanley Manoski <manoski@mitre.org>
  43. Inswave Systems Co., Ltd.: WOOGLAE KIM <wlkim@inswave.com>
  44. Robert Accettura <robert@accettura.com>
  45. Krijn Hoetmer <w3c@qontent.nl>
  46. Jon Hughes <jon@phazm.com>
  47. Patrick D F Ion <pion@umich.edu>
  48. Channy Yun <channy@gmail.com>
  49. Ron Reisor <ron@udel.edu>
  50. Samuel Santos <samaxes@gmail.com>
  51. Grzegorz Babula <gbabula@gmail.com>
  52. Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
  53. Shane Thacker <shanethacker@gmail.com>
  54. Craig Buckler <craigbuckler@gmail.com>
  55. David MacDonald <David100@sympatico.ca>
  56. Vilem Malek <murphy@malek.cz>
  57. Dale Hudjik <dale.hudjik@gmail.com>
  58. David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
  59. Zhihong Mao <zhihong.mao@gmail.com>
  60. James Cassell <w3c@cyberpear.com>
  61. Alvar Laigna <laigna@gmail.com>
  62. Joseph Karr O'Connor <josephoconnor@mac.com>
  63. Benoit Piette <benoit.piette@gmail.com>
  64. Joseph D'Andrea <jdandrea@gmail.com>
  65. Matt Lee <mattl@cnuk.org>
  66. Yusuke Kagiwada <block.rxckin.beats@gmail.com>
  67. Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
  68. Don Kiely <donkiely@computer.org>
  69. Nick Fitzsimons <w3@nickfitz.co.uk>
  70. David Child <dave@addedbytes.com>
  71. Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
  72. Jim Walsh <jim@jwalshcreative.com>
  73. Han Xu <collin@w3china.org>
  74. Mark DuBois <Mark@webprofessionals.org>
  75. Anders Bondehagen <anders@bondehagen.com>
  76. Gian Luca Marroni <gmarroni@libero.it>
  77. S Emerson <w3c@accretewebsolutions.ca>
  78. David Bills <w3@dfbills.com>
  79. Ole Riesenberg <or@oleriesenberg.com>
  80. Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
  81. Justin Anthony Knapp <justinkoavf@gmail.com>
  82. Nik Thierry <me@thisemail.ca>
  83. Robert Stern <rstern@gmail.com>
  84. Hasan Savran <hsavran@kent.edu>
  85. Pedro Xavier Jorge <pedro.xavierjorge@gmail.com>
  86. Simon Myers <Smylers@stripey.com>
  87. Andrew Ramsden <andrew@irama.org>
  88. Eihab Ibrahim <eihabibrahim@gmail.com>
  89. Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
  90. Alejandro Fernandez <alejandro@mediadvanced.com>
  91. Shefik Macauley <allknightaccess@gmail.com>
  92. Doug Jones <doug_b_jones@me.com>
  93. John Vernaleo <john@netpurgatory.com>
  94. Greg Johnson <greg.johnson@gmail.com>
  95. Vicente García Díaz <vicegd@live.com>
  96. Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>
  97. Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>
  98. Martijn Croonen <martijn@martijnc.be>
  99. Lukáš Čihák <lukas.cihak@mensa.cz>
  100. Sierk Bornemann <sierkb@gmail.com>
  101. Danny Liang <danny.glue@gmail.com>
  102. Jedi Lin <JediLin@Gmail.com>
  103. Vladimir Sinelnikov <sinelnikov@gmail.com>

Send an email to all the non-responders.


Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders

WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire

Report issues on GitHub project w3c/wbs-design (preferred) or by mail to sysreq.