w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire 29 March HTML WG Teleconference
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody.
This questionnaire was open from 2007-03-24 to 2007-03-27.
35 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
1. Are you interested and available to meet? Which times?
It seems we have enough agenda topics and issues to merit a teleconference.
Dan offers to chair at 11am, 12pm, or 1pm Boston time on Thursday, 29 March, for 60 to 90 minutes. (See times in Los Angeles, Paris, and Boston).
Dan will send a detailed agenda with exact time, phone number, etc. at least 24 hours before the meeting.
The teleconference will be recorded in IRC in near-real-time, and we'll make an effort to accomodate IRC-only participation. Edited minutes will go out by email within a day or two.
(For consistency, the responses that were count as 'prefered' are also counted as 'can live with')
Summary
| Choice | All responders | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Prefer | Can live with | Neither | |
| 15:00UTC, 11am Boston, 8am Los Angeles, 5pm Paris | 13 | 27 | 8 |
| 16:00UTC, 12noon Boston, 9am Los Angeles, 6pm Paris | 8 | 28 | 7 |
| 17:00 UTC, 1pm Boston, 10am Los Angeles, 7pm Paris | 8 | 31 | 4 |
Ranking of choices in order of least unacceptable/most prefered:
| Ranks | All responders: |
|---|---|
| 1 | 17:00 UTC, 1pm Boston, 10am Los Angeles, 7pm Paris |
| 2 | 16:00UTC, 12noon Boston, 9am Los Angeles, 6pm Paris |
| 3 | 15:00UTC, 11am Boston, 8am Los Angeles, 5pm Paris |
Details
| Responder | Prefer | Can live with | Neither | Comments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15:00UTC, 11am Boston, 8am Los Angeles, 5pm Paris | 16:00UTC, 12noon Boston, 9am Los Angeles, 6pm Paris | 17:00 UTC, 1pm Boston, 10am Los Angeles, 7pm Paris | 15:00UTC, 11am Boston, 8am Los Angeles, 5pm Paris | 16:00UTC, 12noon Boston, 9am Los Angeles, 6pm Paris | 17:00 UTC, 1pm Boston, 10am Los Angeles, 7pm Paris | 15:00UTC, 11am Boston, 8am Los Angeles, 5pm Paris | 16:00UTC, 12noon Boston, 9am Los Angeles, 6pm Paris | 17:00 UTC, 1pm Boston, 10am Los Angeles, 7pm Paris | ||
| Anne van Kesteren | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Daniel Glazman | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Dan Connolly | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| David Håsäther | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Jirka Kosek | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| Julian Reschke | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| John Bachir | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Weekends, and after 6pm, in general are much better for me, as I have a day job. |
| Colin Lieberman | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Earlier is better |
| Andrew Fedoniouk | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| John-Mark Bell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tyler Roehmholdt | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Magnus Kristiansen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tim McMahon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| David Baron | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | This week I prefer 16:00 UTC (because I have a conflict starting at 17:45 UTC), but in general I prefer 17:00 UTC. |
| Lachlan Hunt | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 hours earlier on that day, or on on Friday even at the current times would be more convenient. | ||||
| Simon Pieters | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Benjamin Chait | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| David Andersson | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Guillaume Guérin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| David McFarland | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Mihai Sucan | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Sandy Smith | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Erik van Kempen | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cameron McCormack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Since these times correspond to 1am, 2am and 3am in east coast Australia, I'll find it difficult to attend. I realise it is quite difficult to find good times for all important timezones, though. | ||||
| Maciej Stachowiak | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | I would prefer not to have a teleconference, but I can make it if we have one. I think many of the agenda topics might be better first discussed by email. | ||||
| Alexander Graf | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Tommaso Donnarumma | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Eric Daspet | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |||||
| Henri Sivonen | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Nicolas Le Gall | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ian Hickson | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | I concur with Maciej's comments. For this meeting, I prefer later, but this week only I have a conflict with the 17:00 UTC time and could only make a 60 minute slot from 16:00 UTC to 17:00 UTC. | ||||
| Carol King | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Laurens Holst | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Jens Bannmann | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Can't make it on any of these dates, but the system doesn't allow me to submit if I don't check any boxes. | ||||
| Sierk Bornemann | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
2. Sufficient notice?
I hope this is sufficient notice, but since it's less than the 7 days required by W3C process for meetings, I want to be sure noone objects to us having the teleconference.
If you see any reason that this teleconference shouldn't happen at all, please put it in a comment. Feel free to abstain, but please consider carefully before voting "no", as one "no" vote is sufficient to cancel the meeting or at least postpone it by a week.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| yes | 20 |
| no | |
| concur | 9 |
| abstain | 6 |
Details
| Responder | Sufficient notice? | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Anne van Kesteren | concur | |
| Daniel Glazman | yes | |
| Dan Connolly | yes | |
| David Håsäther | concur | |
| Jirka Kosek | yes | |
| Julian Reschke | yes | |
| John Bachir | abstain | |
| Colin Lieberman | yes | |
| Andrew Fedoniouk | yes | |
| John-Mark Bell | concur | |
| Tyler Roehmholdt | yes | |
| Magnus Kristiansen | yes | |
| Tim McMahon | yes | |
| David Baron | abstain | |
| Lachlan Hunt | yes | |
| Simon Pieters | concur | |
| Benjamin Chait | abstain | |
| David Andersson | yes | |
| Guillaume Guérin | yes | |
| David McFarland | yes | |
| Mihai Sucan | yes | |
| Sandy Smith | concur | |
| Erik van Kempen | yes | |
| Cameron McCormack | yes | |
| Maciej Stachowiak | abstain | I'd rather not have a teleconference for these topics, but not on grounds of insufficient notice. I do not think a phone conversation with many people will make productive progress on the agenda. |
| Alexander Graf | yes | |
| Tommaso Donnarumma | concur | |
| Eric Daspet | concur | |
| Henri Sivonen | concur | I share Maciej Stachowiak's concerns about the usefulness, but I am a bit curious to test if/how it works with a group this large. |
| Nicolas Le Gall | yes | |
| Ian Hickson | abstain | I concur with Maciej's comments. I don't want to cancel the meeting, but I do think that the notice, especially the notice of the agenda, which is by far the most important part, is very short this time. |
| Carol King | yes | |
| Laurens Holst | yes | |
| Jens Bannmann | abstain | The notice should really have been earlier (though it wouldn't have changed anything for me at this date). However, as Maciej, I cannot imagine how a teleconference with so many people might aid an organised discussion if even mailing list usage is already that chaotic. |
| Sierk Bornemann | concur |
More details on responses
- Anne van Kesteren: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:22 (UTC)
- Daniel Glazman: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:25 (UTC)
- Dan Connolly: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:25 (UTC)
- David Håsäther: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:26 (UTC)
- Jirka Kosek: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:26 (UTC)
- Julian Reschke: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:27 (UTC)
- John Bachir: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:30 (UTC)
- Colin Lieberman: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:30 (UTC)
- Andrew Fedoniouk: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:31 (UTC)
- John-Mark Bell: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:31 (UTC)
- Tyler Roehmholdt: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:43 (UTC)
- Magnus Kristiansen: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:48 (UTC)
- Tim McMahon: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:52 (UTC)
- David Baron: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 17:55 (UTC)
- Lachlan Hunt: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 18:13 (UTC)
- Simon Pieters: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 18:14 (UTC)
- Benjamin Chait: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 18:14 (UTC)
- David Andersson: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 19:27 (UTC)
- Guillaume Guérin: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 19:29 (UTC)
- David McFarland: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 19:49 (UTC)
- Mihai Sucan: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 20:39 (UTC)
- Sandy Smith: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 21:12 (UTC)
- Erik van Kempen: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 23:09 (UTC)
- Cameron McCormack: last responded on 24, March 2007 at 23:41 (UTC)
- Maciej Stachowiak: last responded on 25, March 2007 at 03:26 (UTC)
- Alexander Graf: last responded on 25, March 2007 at 03:58 (UTC)
- Tommaso Donnarumma: last responded on 25, March 2007 at 12:45 (UTC)
- Eric Daspet: last responded on 26, March 2007 at 21:31 (UTC)
- Henri Sivonen: last responded on 27, March 2007 at 07:17 (UTC)
- Nicolas Le Gall: last responded on 27, March 2007 at 07:25 (UTC)
- Ian Hickson: last responded on 27, March 2007 at 23:09 (UTC)
- Carol King: last responded on 28, March 2007 at 03:30 (UTC)
- Laurens Holst: last responded on 28, March 2007 at 04:20 (UTC)
- Jens Bannmann: last responded on 28, March 2007 at 05:27 (UTC)
- Sierk Bornemann: last responded on 28, March 2007 at 12:46 (UTC)
Everybody has responded to this questionnaire.
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project