W3C

Site Navigation

The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: www-archive@w3.org

This questionnaire was open from 2015-10-27 to 2015-10-31.

2 answers have been received.

Jump to results for question:

Choose your preference below.

Note: User toggles will require JS and/or markup changes, which are not in scope for 2016, but could happen in the future.

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great; user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required.	2
Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great, but only acceptable if there's also a user toggle.
Side-by-side ToC is acceptable only if it's triggered by the user.
No side-by-side ToC, ever.

Responder	Feedback
Peter Linss	Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great; user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required.
Tab Atkins Jr.	Side-by-side ToC on wide window width is great; user toggle as an enhancement could be nice, but not required.

If you are a specification editor, please tell us whether you can make the necessary markup change happen are a for publications in 2016.

Note: ReSpec and Bikeshed will be automatically updated.

Choice	All responders
Choice	Results
Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents.	2
No, we cannot generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents.

Responder	2016 deployment (optional)
Peter Linss	Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents.
Tab Atkins Jr.	Yes, we can generate <nav id=toc> around the Table of Contents.