w3c/wbs-design or
by mail to sysreq.
W3C
Site Navigation
Nearby
Results of Questionnaire How to Meet WCAG 2.0 – Quickref Update
The results of this questionnaire are available to anybody. In addition, answers are sent to the following email address: ee@w3.org
This questionnaire was open from 2016-03-10 to 2016-03-15.
19 answers have been received.
Jump to results for question:
1. Approval to Publish
I have reviewed the above information and support the publication of the new “How to Meet WCAG 2.0”.
Summary
| Choice | All responders |
|---|---|
| Results | |
| I agree with the changes and approve publication. | 15 |
| I approve publication; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for editors' discretion. | 4 |
| I will approve publication only after the comments in the Comments section below are addressed. | |
| I abstain. |
Details
| Responder | Approval to Publish | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Shawn Lawton Henry | I approve publication; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for editors' discretion. | Yeah! I think we want to add a link to the old/previous version -- because this is a such a huge change, people might want to use the one they are used to, especially at first. I also think we want to add a link to it from the new one, so people can find it. (I said that once in a telecon, and am sorry that I didn't add a GitHub issue for it.) |
| Sharron Rush | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Kevin White | I approve publication; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for editors' discretion. | • I think there is scope to have an open all/close all techniques. While doing evaluations I found myself looking for specific techniques and there is no way to quickly search through all the techniques without opening each set individually. I know this was discussed previously, but while using the How to Meet v2 during an evaluation it became apparent that this was a little bit of a gap. |
| Eric Eggert | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | [Editor] A link to the previous version will be added. A toggle to open/close all techniques boxes was added. |
| Wayne Dick | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Laura Carlson | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Susan Hewitt | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Adam Zerner | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Makoto Ueki | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Andrew Kirkpatrick | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Marc Johlic | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | Congrats Eric and team - this new quickref is GREAT! |
| Kim Dirks | I approve publication; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for editors' discretion. | Left side, "filters" tab, "Clear tags" and by "technologies" - "select all" in stricken text can be confusing for some. I would prefer a different treatment. |
| Alastair Campbell | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Vicki Menezes Miller | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| Andrew Arch | I approve publication; however, I suggest the changes in the Comments section below - for editors' discretion. | Fantastic :) However, maybe we should still link to the existing version for those who don't like change? I've been sending a lot of folk there lately - should have thought of, and mentioned, this sooner. (That said - it should be sun-setted as we presumably won't maintain it either.) |
| Brent Bakken | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | Great Resource! |
| Howard Kramer | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | |
| James Green | I agree with the changes and approve publication. | looks great! |
| Sylvie Duchateau | I agree with the changes and approve publication. |
More details on responses
- Shawn Lawton Henry: last responded on 10, March 2016 at 13:40 (UTC)
- Sharron Rush: last responded on 11, March 2016 at 16:47 (UTC)
- Kevin White: last responded on 14, March 2016 at 08:29 (UTC)
- Eric Eggert: last responded on 14, March 2016 at 16:34 (UTC)
- Wayne Dick: last responded on 14, March 2016 at 22:17 (UTC)
- Laura Carlson: last responded on 14, March 2016 at 23:33 (UTC)
- Susan Hewitt: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 01:39 (UTC)
- Adam Zerner: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 06:36 (UTC)
- Makoto Ueki: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 12:00 (UTC)
- Andrew Kirkpatrick: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 14:50 (UTC)
- Marc Johlic: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 15:00 (UTC)
- Kim Dirks: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 15:11 (UTC)
- Alastair Campbell: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 15:16 (UTC)
- Vicki Menezes Miller: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 16:37 (UTC)
- Andrew Arch: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 21:48 (UTC)
- Brent Bakken: last responded on 15, March 2016 at 22:24 (UTC)
- Howard Kramer: last responded on 16, March 2016 at 02:56 (UTC)
- James Green: last responded on 16, March 2016 at 03:10 (UTC)
- Sylvie Duchateau: last responded on 16, March 2016 at 04:54 (UTC)
Compact view of the results / list of email addresses of the responders
WBS home / Questionnaires / WG questionnaires / Answer this questionnaire
Report issues
on GitHub project