15:43:33 RRSAgent has joined #webont 15:43:47 Zakim has joined #webont 15:46:48 zakim, list conferences 15:46:49 I see WS_ArchWG(f2f)9:00AM, SVG_WG()11:00AM, VB_VBWG()11:00AM 15:48:20 agenda+ Admin -- Roll Call, Minutes, Next tele, ftf meetings, Press Release 15:48:34 agenda+ Action review 15:48:51 agenda+ Guide document 15:49:03 agenda+ Test Document 15:49:24 agenda+ Proposed Resolutions 15:49:29 agenda+ open issues 15:49:32 agenda+ AOB 15:53:48 zakim, agenda 15:53:49 I don't understand 'agenda', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 15:54:33 agenda? 15:58:18 mdean has joined #webont 15:58:56 Mike, I'll phone in soon - greet folks as they arrive 16:00:11 libby_ has joined #webont 16:00:20 pfps has joined #webont 16:00:39 I'll be on and off phone today, sorry - getting a new computer 16:01:43 Zakim, ??P33 is pfps 16:01:43 sorry, pfps, I do not recognize a party named '??P33' 16:01:47 zakim, list conferences 16:01:48 I see WS_ArchWG(f2f)9:00AM, SVG_WG()11:00AM, SW_WebOnt()12:00PM 16:01:56 FvH has joined #webont 16:01:58 zakim, this is SW_WebOnt 16:01:59 ok, jhendler 16:02:08 zakim, who is here? 16:02:09 On the phone I see ??P4, Mike_Dean, ??P30, ??P31, Lassila, ??P33, TimF, ??P35, ??P36 16:02:10 On IRC I see FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:02:11 zakim ??P33 is pfps 16:02:15 jjc has joined #webont 16:02:17 +Jim_Hendler 16:02:21 schreiber has joined #webont 16:02:23 +??P10 16:02:26 zakim, ??P33 is pfps 16:02:27 +Pfps; got it 16:02:37 zakim, ??P10 is libby 16:02:38 +Libby; got it 16:02:39 Zakim, who is here? 16:02:40 On the phone I see ??P4, Mike_Dean, ??P30, ??P31, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, ??P35, ??P36, Jim_Hendler, Libby 16:02:41 On IRC I see schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:02:43 +??P11 16:02:51 zakim, ??p4 is jeremy 16:02:52 +Jeremy; got it 16:03:06 +John_Stanton 16:03:08 Zakim, who is talking? 16:03:20 jjcscribe, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Mike_Dean (13%), Pfps (4%), ??P36 (77%) 16:03:28 +??P2 16:03:29 +??P5 16:03:31 Zakim, who is talking? 16:03:36 zakim, ??p30 is rudiger 16:03:37 +Rudiger; got it 16:03:38 + +1.650.852.aaaa 16:03:43 jjcscribe, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P2 (11%), ??P5 (12%), John_Stanton (26%), ??P30 (11%), Pfps (13%), ??P36 (9%) 16:04:01 zakim aaaa is mcguinness 16:04:09 herman has joined #webont 16:04:12 zakim, aaaa is mcguinness 16:04:13 +Mcguinness; got it 16:04:21 zakim, ??P5 is IanHorrocks 16:04:22 +IanHorrocks; got it 16:04:32 zakim, who is here 16:04:33 jhendler, you need to end that query with '?' 16:04:35 ora has joined #webont 16:04:37 zakim, who is here? 16:04:38 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, ??P31, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, ??P35, ??P36, Jim_Hendler, Libby, ??P11, John_Stanton, ??P2, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness 16:04:40 On IRC I see ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:05:06 zakim, ??p31 is terHorst 16:05:08 +TerHorst; got it 16:05:10 Zakim, who is talking? 16:05:16 DeborahMc has joined #webont 16:05:18 zakim, ?? p35 is eshelman 16:05:21 I don't understand '?? p35 is eshelman', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:05:22 jjcscribe, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Jeremy (57%), Jim_Hendler (9%), ??P11 (5%), Rudiger (4%), Lassila (25%), Pfps (10%), ??P35 (4%) 16:05:29 zakim, ??p35 is eshelman 16:05:30 +Eshelman; got it 16:05:34 zakim, who is here 16:05:35 jhendler, you need to end that query with '?' 16:05:35 +M_Smith 16:05:41 zakim, who is here? 16:05:43 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, TerHorst, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, Eshelman, ??P36, Jim_Hendler, Libby, ??P11, John_Stanton, ??P2, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness, M_Smith 16:05:44 On IRC I see DeborahMc, ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:05:50 +??P16 16:05:55 zakim, ??p2 is GuusS 16:05:57 +GuusS; got it 16:05:58 zakim, ??p36 is heflin 16:05:59 +Heflin; got it 16:06:06 zakim, who is here ? 16:06:07 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, TerHorst, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, Eshelman, Heflin, Jim_Hendler, Libby, ??P11, John_Stanton, GuusS, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness, M_Smith, 16:06:10 ... ??P16 16:06:11 On IRC I see DeborahMc, ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:06:15 Massimo has joined #webont 16:06:19 zakim, ??p16 is buswell 16:06:20 +Buswell; got it 16:06:27 zakim, ??p11 is buswell 16:06:28 +Buswell; got it 16:06:43 zakim, ??p11 is FrankvH 16:06:44 sorry, jhendler, I do not recognize a party named '??p11' 16:06:58 Frank is here 16:07:08 zakim, buswell.a is frank 16:07:10 +Frank; got it 16:07:18 zakim, who is here? 16:07:20 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, TerHorst, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, Eshelman, Heflin, Jim_Hendler, Libby, Frank, John_Stanton, GuusS, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness, M_Smith, 16:07:22 ... Buswell 16:07:24 On IRC I see Massimo, DeborahMc, ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:07:26 +Leo 16:08:09 zakim, who is here? 16:08:11 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, TerHorst, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, Eshelman, Heflin, Jim_Hendler, Libby, Frank, John_Stanton, GuusS, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness, M_Smith, 16:08:12 zakim, wallace is here also. 16:08:12 ... Buswell, Leo 16:08:13 On IRC I see Massimo, DeborahMc, ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:08:15 I don't understand 'wallace is here also.', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:08:27 zakim, add wallace 16:08:35 I don't understand 'add wallace', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:08:43 Wallace is here. 16:08:50 zakim, agenda 16:08:51 I don't understand 'agenda', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:08:55 agenda 16:08:55 +Massimo 16:09:06 agenda? 16:09:26 zakim, agendum 1 16:09:28 I don't understand 'agendum 1', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:09:37 zakim, next agendum 16:09:39 agendum 1. "Admin -- Roll Call, Minutes, Next tele, ftf meetings, Press Release" taken up [from jhendler] 16:09:41 Regrets: connolly welty, marwan, 16:10:30 29th minutes proposed and seconded 16:10:46 Sept 5th minutes proposed and seconded. 16:10:55 No objections to either., 16:11:05 zakim, choose a scribe 16:11:07 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Leo 16:11:12 zakim, choose a scribe 16:11:13 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose TerHorst 16:11:16 next telecon 19th. 16:11:29 Evan volunteers for next scribe 16:11:39 Ian has joined #webont 16:11:43 Agenda in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0155.html 16:12:27 ACTION: Jeremy - update WG on networking for f2f 16:12:55 JosD has joined #webont 16:13:37 ACTION jjc Networking for f2f4 16:13:42 +??P0 16:13:46 +LynnT 16:13:58 ACTION jjc Entertainment f2f4, continued 16:14:05 zakim, ??P0 is jos 16:14:06 +Jos; got it 16:14:07 Zakim, ??P0 is Jos 16:14:09 sorry, jjcscribe, I do not recognize a party named '??P0' 16:14:12 zakim, who is here? 16:14:13 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, TerHorst, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, Eshelman, Heflin, Jim_Hendler, Libby, Frank, John_Stanton, GuusS, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness, M_Smith, 16:14:15 ... Buswell, Leo, Massimo, Jos, LynnT 16:14:16 On IRC I see JosD, Ian, Massimo, DeborahMc, ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:14:22 Zakim, ??P0 is JosD 16:14:23 sorry, JosD, I do not recognize a party named '??P0' 16:15:00 Zakim, jos is JosD 16:15:01 +JosD; got it 16:15:03 ;) 16:15:22 Press release, 1.5 16:15:38 Jim notes we have about the six weeks required to give notice. 16:15:48 ACTION jim to prepare talking points for press release 16:16:05 Can anyone who has bullet points or text please send it to Jim 16:16:17 zakim, next agendum 16:16:18 agendum 1. "Admin -- Roll Call, Minutes, Next tele, ftf meetings, Press Release" taken up [from jhendler] 16:16:28 agenda+ 16:16:36 +Pat_Hayes 16:16:39 next agenda 16:16:45 review Eshelman how-to 16:16:49 next agenda 16:17:11 zakim, agenda+ 16:17:13 agendum 9 added 16:17:20 zakim, agenda next 16:17:21 I don't understand 'agenda next', jjcscribe. Try /msg Zakim help 16:17:31 zakim, agendum next. 16:17:32 I don't understand 'agendum next.', jjcscribe. Try /msg Zakim help 16:17:34 Zakim, take up next agendum 16:17:35 agendum 1. "Admin -- Roll Call, Minutes, Next tele, ftf meetings, Press Release" taken up [from jhendler] 16:17:50 Larry has contributed an example, so action is complete. 16:18:18 Zakim, agenda- 1 16:18:19 agendum 1, Admin -- Roll Call, Minutes, Next tele, ftf meetings, Press Release, dropped 16:18:31 Zakim, next agendum 16:18:32 agendum 1. "Action review" taken up [from jhendler] 16:18:33 Guus UML - continued 16:18:43 from Larry http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0146.html 16:18:52 Chairs editor comparision doc 16:19:08 continued, but Mike is doing something 16:19:11 Action Larrt: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0146.html 16:19:38 rewind, this action is done: Mike Dean is editor 16:19:57 +Lynn_Stein 16:20:03 Action DanC vote is done 16:20:35 Action Mike Dean comparison doc by next week 16:20:51 mike smith walkthru is done 16:20:55 las has joined #webont 16:21:03 zakim, who is here? 16:21:04 On the phone I see Jeremy, Mike_Dean, Rudiger, TerHorst, Lassila, Pfps, TimF, Eshelman, Heflin, Jim_Hendler, Libby, Frank, John_Stanton, GuusS, IanHorrocks, Mcguinness, M_Smith, 16:21:05 (see later in agenda) 16:21:07 ... Buswell, Leo, Massimo, JosD, LynnT, Pat_Hayes, Lynn_Stein 16:21:07 On IRC I see las, JosD, Ian, Massimo, DeborahMc, ora, herman, schreiber, jjcscribe, FvH, pfps, libby_, mdean, Zakim, RRSAgent, jhendler, logger_1 16:21:17 tim finin action is done 16:21:25 ian horrocks action in progress 16:21:30 continue 16:22:17 discussion about grid curtailed by chair 16:22:38 issue 4.4 mike dean continued 16:23:01 heflin issues 16:23:20 5.6 5.14 16:23:28 no one is clear what this action is meant to mean 16:23:36 Jeff has started the discussion. 16:23:54 SO we record this action as done. 16:24:10 Issue 5.1 frank continued 16:24:33 ian is not clear what he needs to do 16:25:29 continued but ian notes this is ongoing research 16:25:33 dan's action continued 16:25:40 5.19 16:27:29 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0082.html 16:27:51 pat's variant is continued 16:27:58 jeremy is done or withdrawn 16:28:14 peter pointed to old discussion 16:28:59 5.3 action item is done 16:29:33 5.19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0125.html 16:29:50 5.3 pfps http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0136.html 16:30:09 5.3 path http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Sep/0100.html 16:30:36 there was a phone call, but it is not clear whether agreement was reached. 16:31:38 there is still an itnegration problem 16:31:51 continue this action 16:32:08 great horned owl action withdrawn 16:32:09 -Buswell 16:32:17 zakim, close agendum 16:32:18 I don't understand 'close agendum', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:32:23 close agendum 16:32:24 Zakim, close this agendum 16:32:25 agendum 1 closed 16:32:25 I see 7 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:32:26 2. Guide document [from jhendler] 16:32:36 zakim, close this agendum 16:32:38 I do not know what agendum had been taken up, jhendler 16:32:51 zakim, agendum 2 16:32:53 I don't understand 'agendum 2', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:33:04 zakim, next agendum 16:33:05 agendum 2. "Guide document" taken up [from jhendler] 16:33:48 Guide document has not progressed this week much. 16:34:02 Goal is to fill in most holes by next week 16:34:58 Mike would like some reviewers now. 16:35:06 But thorough review later on. 16:35:19 ACTION guus review guide 16:35:25 ACTION lynnt review guide 16:35:33 ACTION leo review guide 16:35:41 Frank likes it. 16:35:46 Jim likes it. 16:35:53 Mike is worried about detail. 16:36:48 zakim, close agendum 16:36:49 I don't understand 'close agendum', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 16:36:56 close agendum 16:36:59 next agendum 16:37:48 Zakim, what agendum is this? 16:37:49 agendum 2. "Guide document" has been taken up, Massimo 16:37:57 Zakim, close this agendum 16:37:58 agendum 2 closed 16:37:59 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 16:38:00 3. Test Document [from jhendler] 16:40:31 Chairs would like a test doc, and are asking Jeremy to edit. 16:41:01 Peter likes it 16:41:21 Jos thinks it is going in the right direction 16:41:33 Volunteers for coeditors? 16:42:33 Jos will co-edit. 16:43:38 agendum 4 16:43:43 Peter approves of inclduign tests automatically in doc 16:43:54 zakim, agendum 4 16:43:56 I don't understand 'agendum 4', jjcscribe. Try /msg Zakim help 16:44:03 Zakim, close this agendum 16:44:04 I do not know what agendum had been taken up, Massimo 16:44:21 5a Issue 5.6 16:44:29 Zakim, what agendum is this? 16:44:30 I do not know what agendum has been taken up, Massimo 16:44:38 Zakim, agenda? 16:44:39 I see 6 items remaining on the agenda: 16:44:39 3. Test Document [from jhendler] 16:44:40 4. Proposed Resolutions [from jhendler] 16:44:41 5. open issues [from jhendler] 16:44:42 6. AOB [from jhendler] 16:44:43 7. [from jhendler] 16:44:44 8. [from jjcscribe] 16:45:10 Zakim, take up agendum 4 16:45:11 agendum 4. "Proposed Resolutions" taken up [from jhendler] 16:45:43 summary imports cannot be modified by owl, and the importing doc entails everything entailed by the imported doc 16:46:23 issue is whetehr we can do syntactic import rather than semantic import 16:46:32 +??P9 16:46:41 Peter suggested, jonathan and mike smith all looked at this 16:47:06 Jeff worries about importing large ontology 16:47:08 zakim, ??p9 is ziv 16:47:09 +Ziv; got it 16:47:54 Peter is very uncomfortable with any semantic account of imports 16:48:23 zakim, who is talking? 16:48:35 jjcscribe, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: JosD (14%), Jeremy (20%), IanHorrocks (10%), Pat_Hayes (32%), Pfps (7%), Massimo (5%) 16:48:58 zakim, who is talking? 16:49:09 jjcscribe, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: IanHorrocks (8%), Pat_Hayes (36%), Pfps (44%) 16:49:15 zakim, who is talking? 16:49:35 jjcscribe, listening for 13 seconds I heard sound from the following: JosD (3%), Jeremy (58%), Pat_Hayes (22%), Massimo (6%) 16:51:42 q+ 16:52:22 Jeff really doesn't like the xinclude version of syntactic import 16:52:48 it is not clear whether syntactic or semantic include is better 16:53:13 ack massimo 16:54:07 massimo notes that imports requires persistent uris that doesn't scale web wise 16:54:10 q+ 16:55:37 (earlier pat talked about import cycles etc. also there was discussion about the need to give some acocunt of the GET) 16:56:45 jeremy mentions properties and types witth GETtable resources 16:57:42 q+ 16:57:55 ack 16:57:57 ack jjcscribe 16:58:31 massimo notes that entailment rules don't depend on property uris 16:59:18 frank notes that thisproblem will exist and if we don't say something someone else will have to address it 16:59:46 disagree with the above 16:59:49 I tried to say: 16:59:56 (thanks) 17:00:03 massimo's comment will not >*provide*< a solution, 17:00:15 it just moves the responsibility for solving it away from us 17:00:20 (and into XML, or RDF) 17:02:03 Jim: what is the issue 17:02:37 Pat: issue is to do with taking the object of imports and doing something with it [including in the semantics] 17:03:26 q+ 17:03:56 Jim: we can 1: do semantics for imports, 2: delete it; 3: treat it informally 17:04:57 Jeff: (under 3) where would the english text go, in the semantics doc, in the guide 17:05:37 Pat: in the semantics doc 17:05:39 q+ 17:05:51 3: magic syntax? 17:05:53 ack FvH 17:06:36 ack mdean 17:06:58 (mike smith?): we could treat this completely syntactically, and thatis not part of the semantics 17:08:22 It could be a syntactic transform at the graph level 17:08:44 There seem to be some problems at the document level 17:10:18 Jim: conversation on list needs to continue 17:11:07 q+ 17:11:19 ack fvh 17:11:45 q+ 17:12:14 ACTION pfps write up "syntactic" proposal for issue 5.6 17:12:56 FvH raises using a property from a non-imported foreign ontology 17:13:18 Mike Dean mentions instances cannot import anything 17:14:29 ACTION frank to e-mail group on using foreign properties to continue discussion on 5.6 17:14:44 next agendum issue 5.14 versioning 17:14:58 Jeff suggests adding priorVersion link 17:15:24 Jeff suggests adding backwardCompatibility tag 17:16:29 also deprecation tag 17:17:29 backwardCompatible could be a syntactic trick or a semantic thing 17:18:04 backwradCompatible adds sameClassAs triples (in some way) 17:20:22 path should we have time tags 17:20:33 jimh time is out of charter 17:21:37 resistance to it being a smenatic solution 17:22:08 ACTION jjc send e-mail on what is in an ontology 17:22:40 ACTION path send e-mail on opposition to deprecation 17:22:54 jim would like to move this issues towards closure 17:23:19 Agenda item 6a 17:23:26 Layering, Pat/Peter 17:25:59 -IanHorrocks 17:26:09 I will have to go; 17:26:20 ACTION Pat Propsoe text to close issue 5.3 17:26:21 household duties calling louder than work duties by now... 17:26:26 +??P5 17:26:27 -FvH 17:26:43 6b, 6c not discussed 17:26:55 ACTION Guus add 6b 6c on next week agenda 17:27:07 -Jeremy 17:27:14 Jeremy is still here 17:27:31 -Rudiger 17:27:32 Meeting adjourned 17:27:33 ADJOURNED 17:27:33 -M_Smith 17:27:33 -TerHorst 17:27:34 -Ziv 17:27:35 -LynnT 17:27:35 -John_Stanton 17:27:37 -Lynn_Stein 17:27:39 -Lassila 17:27:40 -Libby 17:27:41 -GuusS 17:27:43 -Leo 17:27:45 -TimF 17:27:45 -Pat_Hayes 17:27:48 -Pfps 17:27:51 -Frank 17:27:53 ora has left #webont 17:27:53 -??P5 17:27:55 -Jim_Hendler 17:27:56 -Mike_Dean 17:27:57 pfps has left #webont 17:27:59 -Massimo 17:28:02 -Mcguinness 17:28:36 zakim, actions? 17:28:37 I don't understand your question, jhendler. 17:28:42 zakim, actions 17:28:43 I don't understand 'actions', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 17:28:51 zakim, list actions 17:28:52 I see WS_ArchWG(f2f)9:00AM, SW_WebOnt()12:00PM 17:29:02 zakim, what actions 17:29:04 I don't understand 'what actions', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 17:30:17 actions 17:30:23 list actions 17:30:33 zakim, what are the actions? 17:30:34 I don't understand your question, jhendler. 17:30:56 zakim, the description of action is not in your document 17:30:57 I don't understand 'the description of action is not in your document', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 17:31:34 actions 17:31:47 zakim, find the actions 17:31:48 I don't understand 'find the actions', jhendler. Try /msg Zakim help 17:32:01 ACTION: Complain to Ralph about the ACTION stuff in zakim 17:32:14 RRSAgent, actions 17:32:14 I'm logging. I don't understand 'actions', jhendler. Try /msg RRSAgent help 17:32:24 RRSAgent, list actions 17:32:24 I see 2 open action items: 17:32:24 ACTION: Jeremy - update WG on networking for f2f [1] 17:32:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/12-webont-irc#T16-12-27 17:32:24 ACTION: Complain to Ralph about the ACTION stuff in zakim [2] 17:32:24 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/12-webont-irc#T17-32-01 17:32:59 ahh - zakim does agenda, but RRSAgent does actions 17:33:12 RRSAgent, pointer 17:33:12 See http://www.w3.org/2002/09/12-webont-irc#T17-33-12 17:35:42 -Heflin 17:35:43 -JosD 17:35:57 -Eshelman 17:35:58 SW_WebOnt()12:00PM has ended