18:59:18 RRSAgent has joined #xmlprotocol 18:59:33 +??P3 18:59:35 +??P4 18:59:42 zakim, ??p4 is probably me 18:59:44 +JacekK?; got it 18:59:48 +??P5 18:59:58 BobLojek has joined #xmlprotocol 19:00:16 Mark_J has joined #xmlprotocol 19:00:18 zakim, mute me temporarily 19:00:19 JacekK? should now be muted 19:00:33 JacekK? should now be unmuted again 19:00:34 +Fallside 19:00:50 +??P7 19:00:56 +Herve 19:01:07 zakim, JacekK is really me 19:01:08 +JacekK; got it 19:01:11 +??P9 19:01:17 PaulC has joined #xmlprotocol 19:01:18 zakim, mute me 19:01:19 JacekK should now be muted 19:01:23 +??P10 19:01:52 http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html 19:01:55 +??P11 19:02:01 + +1.303.791.aaaa 19:02:05 +??P13 19:02:08 +G_Daniels 19:02:10 marc has joined #xmlprotocol 19:02:11 you're welcome, Paul.8-) 19:02:23 I hope it's the URL you wanted. 8-) 19:02:38 +??P18 19:02:41 + +81.72.723.aabb 19:02:45 +Yves 19:02:50 +??P19 19:03:02 zakim, drop yves 19:03:03 Yves is being disconnected 19:03:03 -Yves 19:03:23 +??P15 19:04:04 +LynnT 19:04:07 +Yves 19:04:15 zakim, who is here? 19:04:17 On the phone I see PCotton, Mark_A_Jones, Bob_Lojek, ??P3, JacekK (muted), ??P5, Fallside, ??P7, Herve, Henrik?, ??P10, ??P11, +1.303.791.aaaa, ??P13, G_Daniels, ??P18, 19:04:18 ... +81.72.723.aabb, ??P19, ??P15, Yves, LynnT 19:04:19 On IRC I see marc, PaulC, Mark_J, BobLojek, RRSAgent, Zakim, JacekK, MarkB, DavidF, Henrik, jjm-away, Loggy, caribou, Yves 19:04:21 + +1.720.587.aacc 19:04:54 +Carine 19:05:02 +??P22 19:05:04 -Carine 19:05:05 + +1.480.552.aadd 19:05:10 anish has joined #xmlprotocol 19:06:09 +Carine 19:06:15 +MarkB 19:06:19 +Don 19:06:56 DonM has joined #xmlprotocol 19:07:12 zakim, unmute me 19:07:13 JacekK should no longer be muted 19:07:29 zakim, mute me 19:07:30 JacekK should now be muted 19:07:42 -??P22 19:08:11 +??P16 19:08:27 Stuart has joined #xmlprotocol 19:08:45 +??P22 19:09:43 zakim, mute me 19:09:44 Bob_Lojek should now be muted 19:10:38 yinleng has joined #xmlprotocol 19:13:46 zakim, unmute me 19:13:47 JacekK should no longer be muted 19:14:48 zakim, mute me 19:14:49 JacekK should now be muted 19:17:05 -??P15 19:17:46 +??P15 19:17:51 rayw has joined #xmlprotocol 19:18:49 Actions: 19:19:08 Anish: DONE 19:20:10 Editors: DONE 19:22:05 Editors: Pending 19:22:17 Don: Pending 19:23:07 Editors: Pending 19:23:08 Editors: Pending 19:23:09 Editors: Pending 19:23:26 DavidF: Done 19:24:12 DavidF: Done 19:24:38 Editors: Pending 19:25:39 Stuart: DONE 19:25:51 JJM: Done 19:26:01 Editors: Done 19:26:17 Editors: done 19:26:28 marcH: done 19:26:33 marcH: done 19:27:24 Editors: done 19:27:30 davidF: done 19:27:37 Henrik: Pending 19:27:57 Highland: done 19:28:27 DavidF: pending (added 223) 19:28:34 Editors: done 19:28:43 DonM: done 19:28:57 Editors: done 19:28:59 JJM: done 19:29:14 PaulD: done, got pushback from paul prescod 19:29:38 davidF: done 19:29:45 marcH: done 19:30:02 donM: done 19:32:01 ACTION: DF contact MarkB re. IANA application 19:34:06 +M_Champion 19:40:34 ACTION: Henrik, Stuart, regenerate last sentence on section 2 19:41:34 ACTION 3= Henrik, Stuart, regenerate last sentence of section 2 of 16 July AF doc 19:41:47 ACTION 2= Henrik, Stuart, regenerate last sentence of section 2 of 16 July AF doc 19:45:57 change to 16 july AF doc: introduce "attachment"/"part" in the INtroduction 19:46:49 change to 16 july AF doc, sec 5: refer to "primary SOAP part" 19:52:15 change to 16 july AF doc, e.g. sec 5: ensure we correctly refer to "compound soap structure" rather than "message" 19:53:28 change to 16 july AF doc, sec 5: remove sentence "This feature MAY be used, a priori ..." 19:56:07 - +1.303.791.aaaa 19:59:28 zakim, unmute me 19:59:30 JacekK should no longer be muted 20:00:12 zakim, mute me 20:00:13 JacekK should now be muted 20:00:23 change to 16 july AF doc, sec 6: uncap NEED NOT 20:01:11 zakim, unmute me 20:01:12 JacekK should no longer be muted 20:02:28 +DOrchard 20:03:31 zakim, mute me 20:03:32 JacekK should now be muted 20:03:34 change to 16 july AF doc, sec 6: add example mentioning SOAP w/ Att 20:07:02 change to 16 july AF doc, sec 5.1 and 5.2: remove "Note" and make reference in 5.0 to the warning section re. overlapping properties in the main SOAP spec 20:09:57 change to 16 july AF doc, sec 8: ensure last para reads as examples 20:14:38 DaveO has joined #xmlprotocol 20:14:45 zakim, unmute me 20:14:46 JacekK should no longer be muted 20:14:51 DavidO joined a few minutes ago 20:15:28 zakim, mute me 20:15:30 JacekK should now be muted 20:19:56 ACTION: herve Try to reformat AFTF draft to looks like a W3C document for next telcon 20:20:48 zakim, unmute me 20:20:49 JacekK should no longer be muted 20:29:48 Henrik has joined #xmlprotocol 20:37:30 ACTION: DavidF & Yves, take Jacek's filtered version and merge it to table 2 of implementation list 20:37:47 caribou has joined #xmlprotocol 20:40:05 ACTION 4= DavidF & Yves, take Jacek's filtered version and merge it to table 2 of implementation list (add numbering scheme) 20:43:45 -MarkB 20:46:01 zakim, mute me 20:46:02 JacekK should now be muted 20:49:18 http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#RPCWebArguments 20:49:43 -??P19 20:50:57 ACTION: editors, Look at part 2 to see if it answers Paul Prescod's pushback 20:51:18 ACTION 5= editors, Look at part 2 to see if it answers Paul Prescod's pushback on issue 226 20:54:22 Marc's email is at: 20:54:23 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0108.html 20:54:48 Proposal 20:54:48 ======== 20:54:48 I think Stuart pretty much nailed it above. Identifying a node is 20:54:48 optional, but when a node *is* identified a URI is used. 20:54:48 Suggest we change "A SOAP node MUST be identified by a URI." to "A 20:54:50 SOAP node is identified by an unambiguous URI". 20:55:44 great resolution! 20:56:11 ACTION: Editors Incorporate change to close issue 217 20:56:20 ACTION: StuartW Send closure text to xmlp-comments on issue 217 20:57:35 ACTION 5= editors, Look at part 2 to see if it answers Paul Prescod's pushback on issue 226; if so, contact Prescod and ask whether part 2 text OK and for him to send new email to xmlp-comment; if not OK w/ Prescod, come back to WG 20:58:28 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jul/0109.html 20:58:37 ACTION 6= Editors Incorporate change to close issue 217 ("A SOAP Node is identified by an unambiguous URI.") 20:59:18 "4. Process all mandatory header blocks targeted at the node and, 20:59:19 in the case of an ultimate SOAP receiver, the SOAP body. A SOAP 20:59:19 node MAY also choose to process non-mandatory SOAP header blocks 20:59:19 targeted at it." 21:00:01 -JacekK 21:00:19 ACTION: Editors, Incorporate MarchH proposed change to close issue 229 21:00:27 ACTION: MarcH Send closure text to xmlp-comments on issue 229 21:00:30 -M_Champion 21:00:31 -G_Daniels 21:00:32 -Don 21:00:33 -??P7 21:00:34 -??P5 21:00:35 -??P11 21:00:35 anish has left #xmlprotocol 21:00:35 -Henrik? 21:00:37 -DOrchard 21:00:38 -Yves 21:00:39 -??P22 21:00:40 -LynnT 21:00:42 -Carine 21:00:42 rrsagent, excuse us 21:00:42 I see 9 open action items: 21:00:42 ACTION: DF contact MarkB re. IANA application [1] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-32-01 21:00:42 ACTION: Henrik, Stuart, regenerate last sentence of section 2 of 16 July AF doc [2] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T19-40-34 21:00:42 ACTION: herve Try to reformat AFTF draft to looks like a W3C document for next telcon [3] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-19-56 21:00:42 ACTION: DavidF & Yves, take Jacek's filtered version and merge it to table 2 of implementation list (add numbering scheme) [4] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-37-30 21:00:42 ACTION: editors, Look at part 2 to see if it answers Paul Prescod's pushback on issue 226; if so, contact Prescod and ask whether part 2 text OK and for him to send new email to xmlp-comment; if not OK w/ Prescod, come back to WG [5] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-50-57 21:00:42 ACTION: Editors Incorporate change to close issue 217 ("A SOAP Node is identified by an unambiguous URI.") [6] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-56-11 21:00:42 ACTION: StuartW Send closure text to xmlp-comments on issue 217 [7] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-56-20 21:00:42 ACTION: Editors, Incorporate MarchH proposed change to close issue 229 [8] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T21-00-19 21:00:42 ACTION: MarcH Send closure text to xmlp-comments on issue 229 [9] 21:00:42 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/07/17-xmlprotocol-irc#T21-00-27 21:00:44 - +1.720.587.aacc 21:00:46 - +1.480.552.aadd 21:00:48 -Mark_A_Jones 21:00:50 -??P13 21:00:50 marc has left #xmlprotocol 21:00:52 -Bob_Lojek 21:00:54 -??P15 21:00:56 -Herve 21:00:58 -Fallside 21:01:00 -??P18 21:01:02 -??P16 21:01:04 -??P3 21:01:06 +??P1 21:01:06 Stuart has left #xmlprotocol 21:01:08 -??P10