19:01:43 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #xmlprotocol
19:02:06 <PaulC> PaulC has joined #xmlprotocol
19:05:14 <DavidF> zakim, who is here?
19:05:16 <Zakim> sorry, DavidF, I don't know what conference this is
19:05:17 <Zakim> On IRC I see PaulC, RRSAgent, marc, Zakim, Noah, DavidF, caribou, Yves, Loggy, Henrik
19:05:21 <Yves> zakim, this is xmlp
19:05:23 <Zakim> ok, Yves
19:05:29 <Yves> zakim, who is here?
19:05:30 <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P0, ??P1, ??P2, PCotton, ??P4, ??P6, ??P5, Herve, ??P8, Fallside, Yves, ??P11, Carine, ??P12, ??P13, +1.480.552.aaaa, DMarston
19:05:32 <Zakim> On IRC I see PaulC, RRSAgent, marc, Zakim, Noah, DavidF, caribou, Yves, Loggy, Henrik
19:05:51 <Zakim> +JinYu
19:06:35 <DavidF> zakim, how many people are here?
19:06:38 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, DavidF.
19:09:12 <Zakim> +Ellen.Perlow
19:14:15 <newbie> newbie has joined #xmlprotocol
19:14:55 <Noah> So the syntax is "ACTION: xxx", is that right?
19:14:57 <Yves> msg &sysreq that will be enough, thanks
19:15:20 <Yves> email pb was apparently a size limit of the attachement
19:15:22 <Noah> Huh? Yves, was that a response to me
19:15:40 <Yves> noah: no I was dealing with the email problem
19:15:52 <Noah> OK, notes are crossing.  Sorry
19:16:12 <Noah> OK, thank you!
19:16:42 <scribe_mh> Agenda review 
19:17:33 <Noah> Yeah, I got that.  Do I also log completed actions, or does that go in scribe_mh's log of the minutes?
19:18:01 <scribe_mh> i think you get to do that bit 
19:18:14 <Noah> ...fine, and the syntax with which I do it is?
19:18:18 <caribou> it does not go to the minutes anyway
19:18:39 <Noah> OK.  I'll just informally type it in.
19:18:59 <scribe_mh> AOB 
19:19:55 <scribe_mh> 1. DF: LC announce draft sent out - comment to the list please 
19:20:38 <scribe_mh> 2. DF: GETF resolution, TAG has requested resolution email to be sent to their public list - need volunteer to produce resolution email 
19:21:23 <scribe_mh> DF: woudl prefer to get this done this week, but early next week is probably OK 
19:21:45 <scribe_mh> NM: volunteered 
19:21:59 <scribe_mh> JI: volunteered 
19:22:05 <scribe_mh> PC: volunteered 
19:22:55 <scribe_mh> DF: version posted to WG prior to TAG, no comments within a day, send to TAG 
19:22:57 <ActionLog> ACTION: Noah, John Ibbotson, Paul Cotton...draft resolution text for RPC to TAG mailing list.  Mail to protocols WG for 1 day review
19:23:26 <scribe_mh> Review of last weeks minutes 
19:23:37 <scribe_mh> Accepted without change 
19:23:51 <scribe_mh> Action items 
19:23:59 <Yves> EDITORS: Pending
19:24:09 <Yves> MarkB: Pending
19:24:17 <Yves> Editors: Done
19:25:03 <Yves> Lynne & Anish: Done
19:25:03 <Zakim> -JinYu
19:25:28 <ActionLog> Editors 
19:25:28 <ActionLog> Redirect non editorial issues to last call issues list 
19:25:35 <ActionLog> NOT DONE
19:25:44 <ActionLog> MarkB 
19:25:45 <ActionLog> Prompt WG to do thorough review of media type draft by mid-june so that it can be submitted before July 1st. 
19:25:46 <ActionLog> PENDING
19:26:03 <ActionLog> Editors 
19:26:03 <ActionLog> Fix 5.5.1 to say MAY ONLY or something like that, to better reflect the spirit of issue 194 resolution that can be tested as an assertion 
19:26:05 <ActionLog> DONE
19:26:13 <ActionLog> Lynne & Anish 
19:26:15 <ActionLog> Publish new test collections doc over this w/e 
19:26:23 <ActionLog> DONE
19:26:28 <ActionLog> DavidF 
19:26:28 <ActionLog> send the issue closing text to xmlp-comment (issue #36) 
19:26:30 <ActionLog> DONE
19:26:36 <ActionLog> DavidF 
19:26:36 <ActionLog> Chat with Mark B to figure out what to say about ID in LC announce 
19:26:45 <ActionLog> Email sent, awaiting reply.  Mark DONE.
19:26:50 <scribe_mh> PC: requests big attachments to go to www-archive and then send pointer - more friendly to the bandwidth challenged 
19:27:16 <scribe_mh> Agenda item 5 
19:27:43 <scribe_mh> DF: decided last week on document suite, now need to see what needs to be done to each to get to LC 
19:28:05 <scribe_mh> SOAP 1.2 Pt 1: 
19:28:37 <scribe_mh> HFN: new status, upodate namespace, remove chnage log, remove diffs colouring 
19:28:52 <scribe_mh> HFN: all apply to Pt2 as well 
19:29:10 <ActionLog> Actually, I think he said there's probably no coloring in pt1
19:29:34 <scribe_mh> DF: also update member list 
19:32:04 <scribe_mh> DF: some people have contributed a great deal recently, names that spring to mind include Chris, Stuart, Noah 
19:32:12 <scribe_mh> MH: where do we draw the line 
19:32:16 <Zakim> + +1.617.896.aabb
19:32:17 <Zakim> +??P15
19:32:32 <scribe_mh> DF: editor would also be expected to do the less glamorous stuff 
19:33:21 <Zakim> +??P18
19:33:32 <scribe_mh> MH: alternate, add new section of significant contributors 
19:34:01 <scribe_mh> NM: is willing to undertake editorial tasks 
19:34:39 <scribe_mh> DF: take offline, general consensus that we should recognise significant contributors 
19:35:01 <scribe_mh> HFN: does this apply to other docs ? 
19:35:03 <Yves> zakim, mute ??P18 temporarily
19:35:05 <Zakim> ??P18 should now be muted
19:35:06 <ActionLog> ACTION: DF to take consideration of expansion of editor list to email for resolution
19:35:20 <Zakim> ??P18 should now be unmuted again
19:36:22 <Zakim> + +1.734.747.aacc
19:36:36 <scribe_mh> bad echo halts play temorarilly 
19:37:49 <scribe_mh> DF: how long will the 5 chnages take 
19:37:55 <scribe_mh> editors: 2 days 
19:38:02 <ActionLog> ACTION: Editors (by Friday) take care of the "five items" (color marking of changes out, change log out, etc.)
19:38:13 <scribe_mh> SOAP 1.2 Pt2 
19:38:23 <scribe_mh> DF all of the 5 for pt1 
19:38:33 <scribe_mh> DF: 185 ednote 
19:39:00 <ActionLog> ACTION=3: Editors (by Friday) take care of the "five items" (color marking of changes out, change log out, etc.) in parts 1 and 2
19:39:31 <scribe_mh> DF: 185 resolution ednote may need editing - tests WG understanding of ednote  
19:40:20 <scribe_mh> HFN: understanding is: leave as is or take out 
19:41:17 <scribe_mh> DF: should clarify ednote: add "based on this feedback the WG may decide to remove generics ina future version" 
19:41:54 <Henrik> Proposal regarding 185: either to keep 'generics' asis or to drop it altogther. No tweaks
19:42:00 <scribe_mh> DF: +"of this specification" 
19:42:04 <camilo> camilo has joined #xmlprotocol
19:42:20 <scribe_mh> Agreed 
19:42:36 <ActionLog> Please unmute me!! Is there an action resulting from what we just did on generics?
19:42:45 <scribe_mh> DF: HTTP 202, 204 
19:42:46 <ActionLog> I am muted
19:42:50 <ActionLog> How do I unmute?
19:43:06 <Yves> zakim, who is muted?
19:43:07 <Zakim> I see ??P0, ??P2, PCotton, DMarston muted
19:43:12 <Yves> zakim, unmute ??P0
19:43:13 <Zakim> ??P0 should no longer be muted
19:43:15 <Yves> zakim, unmute ??P2
19:43:16 <Zakim> ??P2 should no longer be muted
19:43:26 <Yves> it should be ok
19:43:28 <ActionLog> I am talking
19:43:34 <Zakim> +PaulD
19:43:35 <ActionLog> I'm trying
19:43:36 <Yves> zakim, unmute DMarston
19:43:37 <Zakim> DMarston should no longer be muted
19:44:11 <Yves> zakim, mute ??P0
19:44:11 <Yves> zakim, mute ??P2
19:44:13 <Zakim> ??P0 should now be muted
19:44:13 <Zakim> ??P2 should now be muted
19:44:23 <ActionLog> ACTION: update ednote on generics.
19:46:24 <scribe_mh> NM: proposed text is friendly amendment to text from CF 
19:46:45 <scribe_mh> HFN: can live with, both need to be updated to reflect GETF resolution 
19:47:00 <Zakim> - +1.617.896.aabb
19:47:03 <DavidF> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002May/0102.html
19:47:11 <DavidF> is NM's amendment
19:47:49 <scribe_mh> MH: last paragraph needs editing in respect of GETF 
19:48:11 <DavidF> CF's original http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002May/0095.html
19:48:12 <Zakim> +??P17
19:48:39 <scribe_mh> NM: propose we adopt [12] with small tune up to reflect GETF changes 
19:49:39 <scribe_mh> HFN: 2nd para talks specifically about RR MEP, should add the response MEP 
19:49:43 <scribe_mh> NM: agrees 
19:50:07 <scribe_mh> DF: we need to see the modified version of the text 
19:50:32 <ActionLog> Specific changes are to add reference to new response MEP, and also last paragraph and take out mention of GET
19:50:47 <scribe_mh> DF: NM wil send email, editors will add to doc on the assumption that it is OK  
19:50:58 <ActionLog> ACTION: Noah, by end of day Thurs, draft text changes to update http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-protocol-wg/2002May/0102.html
19:51:29 <scribe_mh> HFN: aside 202 and 204 removed from table ? 
19:51:42 <scribe_mh> MH: agrees 
19:52:28 <scribe_mh> NM: agrees 
19:52:51 <scribe_mh> DF: table 17 is where the chnage need sot be made to remove 202 and 204 
19:52:52 <ActionLog> ACTION: editors, remove from table 17, part 2, indication that we support http codes 202 and 204
19:54:47 <scribe_mh> HFN: proposes to delete appendix C 
19:54:50 <ActionLog> ACTION: Editors, delete part 2 appendix C and all references to it
19:54:53 <scribe_mh> no dissent 
20:01:21 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #xmlprotocol
20:01:35 <scribe_mh> Nilo: will send - most comments included 
20:02:09 <ActionLog> ACTION: (repeated for log) Nilo. update primer for namespace, change log, colors, members list (needs member list from David)
20:02:29 <scribe_mh> DF: does group want more time to review chnages to primer re GETF 
20:02:31 <ActionLog> ACTION: (repeated for log) DF resolve status section, especially with respect to PR intentions, etc.
20:02:52 <scribe_mh> no response 
20:02:57 <ActionLog> Yves:  was the earlier pre-crash log lost, or do we have both?
20:03:13 <scribe_mh> DF: if you have any comments on primer, send in by end of week 
20:03:31 <Yves> the log should be on the web already, and current msg will be appended
20:03:47 <ActionLog> ACTION: DF send email to working group on comment on primer
20:04:06 <scribe_mh> Assertions and test collection 
20:04:24 <scribe_mh> anish: doc include feedback from henrik and don mullen 
20:04:39 <scribe_mh> anish: also major cleanup of all tests 
20:05:05 <scribe_mh> anish: added list of header blocks, body blocks used by test collection 
20:05:31 <scribe_mh> anish: GETF changes not included 
20:05:51 <scribe_mh> anish: request to be CCed on email with new namespace 
20:06:45 <scribe_mh> anish: to do: namespace change, GETF, status 
20:08:05 <scribe_mh> DF: where is doc wrt getf 
20:08:07 <ActionLog> ACTION: Henrik send stylesheet to Anish
20:08:10 <scribe_mh> anish: not done 
20:08:32 <scribe_mh> df: what plans for including GETF 
20:08:40 <scribe_mh> anish: can start on Fri 
20:09:21 <scribe_mh> DF: how long will it take 
20:09:27 <scribe_mh> anish: 1.5 days 
20:09:39 <scribe_mh> DF: would more people help ? 
20:09:43 <scribe_mh> anish: yes 
20:11:24 <scribe_mh> JI: volunteers to work out changes to assertions due to GETF 
20:11:43 <scribe_mh> DF: what else can we do to expedite 
20:12:19 <scribe_mh> anish: most time consuming is looking at chnages and working out test modifications 
20:12:36 <PaulC> david, I am muted and cannot be heard.
20:12:40 <scribe_mh> DF: volunteers to help with that 
20:12:51 <PaulC> I have a comment on the tests can someone please tell david f.
20:12:55 <scribe_mh> silence 
20:13:17 <scribe_mh> s/volunteers/asks for volunteers/ 
20:13:40 <PaulC> Can someone please request that PaulC be unmuted?
20:13:52 <Yves> zakim, who is muted?
20:13:54 <Zakim> I see PCotton muted
20:14:01 <Yves> zakim, unmute PCotton
20:14:02 <Zakim> PCotton should no longer be muted
20:14:25 <ActionLog> zakim, mute DMarston
20:14:26 <Zakim> DMarston should now be muted
20:14:27 <scribe_mh> PC: what kind of tests are we thinking of adding for GETF 
20:14:51 <scribe_mh> DF: don't know, but we need to do due dilligence 
20:15:29 <ActionLog> zakim, unmute DMarston
20:15:31 <Zakim> DMarston should no longer be muted
20:15:51 <scribe_mh> PC: would a test be " a client makes a request and gets a SOAP envelope" ? 
20:16:09 <scribe_mh> anish: need to look at assertions and think about it 
20:17:22 <scribe_mh> NM: no difference to existing tests, could assert that the should be a resource that responds appropriately to a GET and add tests around that 
20:19:12 <scribe_mh> anish: could we do something around an RPC that takes no args 
20:19:33 <scribe_mh> NM: slippery slope 
20:20:22 <scribe_mh> DF: any other issues re test collection ? 
20:21:08 <ActionLog> ACTION: Anish, by Monday, update test collection to reflect RPC/GET, etc.
20:21:33 <scribe_mh> DF: look for updated do on Monday, does WG want time to look it over ? 
20:21:58 <scribe_mh> DF: version we see on monday will be the LC 
20:22:18 <scribe_mh> Requirements Document 
20:23:48 <scribe_mh> DF: recalls previous discussion, doesn't think there is anything to do on it. need someone to take on task of making a LC version 
20:23:55 <scribe_mh> no volunteers 
20:24:07 <scribe_mh> DF; volunteers to do it 
20:24:13 <ActionLog> ACTION: DF work with Bob Lojeck to bring Requirements doc into last call condition (presumably mostly boilerplate)
20:24:16 <scribe_mh> Usage Scenarios 
20:24:53 <scribe_mh> JI: nothing substantial to be done, just status type boilerplate 
20:25:29 <scribe_mh> DF: ready by end of week ? 
20:25:44 <scribe_mh> JI: provided boilerplate is ready - yes 
20:25:49 <scribe_mh> Email binding 
20:26:24 <scribe_mh> HM: no substantial changes required, should be ready by end of week 
20:26:39 <scribe_mh> DF: different status - work with Yves and Carrine 
20:26:58 <scribe_mh> Media Type draft 
20:27:16 <scribe_mh> DF: not part of our W3C output as such 
20:27:32 <scribe_mh> DF: unclear what else needs to be done 
20:28:02 <scribe_mh> HFN: put up on our server and add ref from home page, also some edits outstanding 
20:28:23 <scribe_mh> HFN: need to decide when to issue a new draft 
20:29:53 <scribe_mh> DF: will email MB again 
20:30:32 <scribe_mh> Document list completed 
20:30:32 <ActionLog> ACTION: DF to email Mark Baker (if anyone knows how to phone him, please contact David)
20:31:16 <scribe_mh> DF: is WG ready to request LC once all changes above have been made 
20:31:22 <scribe_mh> silence 
20:31:26 <ActionLog> YYY..YES...SSS!!!
20:32:05 <scribe_mh> DF: take silence as assent, we will then go ahead with LC once chnages are made 
20:32:05 <ActionLog> DF: without dissent, we agree to go to last call once the changes discussed today have been made.
20:32:10 <PaulC> PlanetFred phone number (613) 789-1818
20:32:32 <ActionLog> Were we looking for a US number for MarkB or is the problem that he's traveling?
20:32:48 <Zakim> -??P11
20:34:10 <scribe_mh> Discussion of checking WDs against guidelines 
20:34:23 <scribe_mh> Yves will send out pointers 
20:35:01 <scribe_mh> NM: are W3C staff aware of our near LC status 
20:35:04 <Henrik> ACTION: Yves: Send out pointers to WD guidelines and document validators
20:35:26 <scribe_mh> DF: has sent email to W3C - no responses yet 
20:36:15 <scribe_mh> PC: need to get permission to make patent disclosures public 
20:36:46 <Henrik> Can we agree on the namespace URI prefix now? The last WD used "http://www.w3.org/2001/12"?
20:36:48 <ActionLog> ACTION: DF get agreement from members to make their "disclosures" public
20:37:02 <scribe_mh> 2002/6 ? 
20:37:05 <Henrik> I guess it should be "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/..."
20:37:39 <Yves> sounds good to me
20:37:48 <Yves> who will update the schemas?
20:38:11 <PaulC> And someone has to supply the text at the end of the Namespaces?
20:38:34 <PaulC> Since they have to be resolvable (according to the W3C).
20:38:50 <Yves> I'll copy the one used for the current namespace
20:38:57 <Yves> copy/update
20:39:42 <ActionLog> ACTION: Editors (arguably a dup of action above) update various schemas to refer to the right namespaces
20:40:21 <ActionLog> ACTION: to W3C staff, to appropriately name files such as schemas so that URI's do resolve to a resource
20:41:12 <DavidF>  ACTION = 11 to W3C staff, to appropriately name files so that namespace URI's do resolve to a resource
20:41:38 <Yves> henrik: http://www.w3.org/2001/07/pubrules-form
20:41:45 <Yves> henrik: http://www.w3.org/Guide/Pubrules
20:42:03 <scribe_mh> PC: discuss feedback on LC call ? 
20:42:12 <scribe_mh> DF; do, will do it via email 
20:42:21 <scribe_mh> s/do/no 
20:42:29 <Henrik> yves, thanks - please send to WG list as many of the other editors are not on IRC today
20:42:51 <Yves> yep, it's just to have them on the log, easier to track down again :)
20:45:31 <scribe_mh> adjourned 
20:45:32 <Zakim> -??P13
20:45:33 <Zakim> -??P12
20:45:35 <Zakim> -??P1
20:45:37 <Zakim> -??P8
20:45:38 <Zakim> - +1.480.552.aaaa
20:45:38 <Zakim> -DMarston
20:45:40 <Zakim> -Herve
20:45:40 <Zakim> -??P15
20:45:41 <Zakim> - +1.734.747.aacc
20:45:43 <Zakim> -??P2
20:45:44 <Zakim> -Fallside
20:45:45 <Zakim> -??P5
20:45:47 <Zakim> -??P17
20:45:50 <Zakim> -??P6
20:45:51 <Zakim> -PCotton
20:45:53 <Zakim> -PaulD
20:45:56 <Zakim> -??P18
20:45:57 <Zakim> -Yves
20:46:00 <Zakim> -Ellen.Perlow
20:46:01 <Zakim> -??P4
20:46:03 <Zakim> -Carine
20:46:09 <Zakim> -??P0
20:46:10 <Zakim> WS_XMLP()3:00PM has ended
20:47:08 <DavidF> zakim, list actions
20:47:10 <Zakim> I see no active conferences
20:48:55 <DavidF> rrsagent, what are actions
20:48:56 <DavidF> I'm logging. I don't understand 'what are actions', DavidF.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
20:49:05 <DavidF> rrsagent, what actions
20:49:05 <DavidF> I'm logging. I don't understand 'what actions', DavidF.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
20:49:10 <Yves> rrsagent: actions?
20:49:10 <Yves> I'm logging.  Sorry, nothing found for 'actions'
20:49:16 <Yves> rrsagent: list actions
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> I see 11 action items:
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: (repeated for log) Nilo. update primer for namespace, change log, colors, members list (needs member list from David) [1]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-02-09
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: (repeated for log) DF resolve status section, especially with respect to PR intentions, etc. [2]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-02-31
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF send email to working group on comment on primer [3]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-03-47
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Henrik send stylesheet to Anish [4]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-08-07
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Anish, by Monday, update test collection to reflect RPC/GET, etc. [5]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-21-08
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF work with Bob Lojeck to bring Requirements doc into last call condition (presumably mostly boilerplate) [6]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-24-13
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF to email Mark Baker (if anyone knows how to phone him, please contact David) [7]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-30-32-1
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Yves: Send out pointers to WD guidelines and document validators [8]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-35-04
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF get agreement from members to make their "disclosures" public [9]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-36-48
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Editors (arguably a dup of action above) update various schemas to refer to the right namespaces [10]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-39-42
20:49:16 <RRSAgent> ACTION: to W3C staff, to appropriately name files such as schemas so that URI's do resolve to a resource [11]
20:49:16 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-40-21
20:51:27 <Yves> it should be ok now
20:52:55 <Zakim> Zakim has left #xmlprotocol
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> I see 11 action items:
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: (repeated for log) Nilo. update primer for namespace, change log, colors, members list (needs member list from David) [1]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-02-09
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: (repeated for log) DF resolve status section, especially with respect to PR intentions, etc. [2]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-02-31
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF send email to working group on comment on primer [3]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-03-47
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Henrik send stylesheet to Anish [4]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-08-07
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Anish, by Monday, update test collection to reflect RPC/GET, etc. [5]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-21-08
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF work with Bob Lojeck to bring Requirements doc into last call condition (presumably mostly boilerplate) [6]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-24-13
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF to email Mark Baker (if anyone knows how to phone him, please contact David) [7]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-30-32-1
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Yves: Send out pointers to WD guidelines and document validators [8]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-35-04
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: DF get agreement from members to make their "disclosures" public [9]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-36-48
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Editors (arguably a dup of action above) update various schemas to refer to the right namespaces [10]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-39-42
20:52:58 <RRSAgent> ACTION: to W3C staff, to appropriately name files such as schemas so that URI's do resolve to a resource [11]
20:52:58 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/06/12-xmlprotocol-irc#T20-40-21