Edit ISSUE-60: Web Application State Management

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. Agenda for TAG F2F 4-6 January 2012 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-12-30) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-12-30)
  2. Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 15 December (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-12-14) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-12-14)
  3. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 1 December 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-11-29) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-11-29)
  4. Draft Minutes of November 17 Telcon (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-11-23) (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-11-23)
  5. Re: Final agenda for TAG teleconference of 17 November 2011 (from amy@w3.org on 2011-11-17) (from amy@w3.org on 2011-11-17)
  6. Final agenda for TAG teleconference of 17 November 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-11-16) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-11-16)
  7. Re: Agenda for today's TAG teleconference (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2011-10-28) (from Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com on 2011-10-28)
  8. Agenda for today's TAG teleconference (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-27) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-27)
  9. Re: No formal TAG call 10/20/11 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-21) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-21)
  10. No formal TAG call 10/20/11 (from masinter@adobe.com on 2011-10-20) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2011-10-20)
  11. Agenda for TAG call 10/20/11 (from masinter@adobe.com on 2011-10-20) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2011-10-20)
  12. Re: Draft Agenda for TAG call 10/20/11 (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2011-10-20) (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2011-10-20)
  13. Draft Agenda for TAG call 10/20/11 (from LMM@acm.org on 2011-10-19) (from LMM@acm.org on 2011-10-19)
  14. RE: Draft Agenda for TAG call 10/20/11 (from masinter@adobe.com on 2011-10-19) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2011-10-19)
  15. Re: Draft Agenda for TAG call 10/20/11 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-19) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-19)
  16. Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 13 October 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-12) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-12)
  17. Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 6 October 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-04) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-10-04)
  18. Agenda for TAG F2F meeting: 13-15 September 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-09-05) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-09-05)
  19. Minutes for September 1 Telcon (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-09-04) (from jeni@jenitennison.com on 2011-09-04)
  20. Very preliminary agenda and required reading for 13-15 Sept. 2011 TAG F2F now available (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-08-30) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-08-30)
  21. Draft TAG minutes 2011-04-28 (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2011-05-05) (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2011-05-05)
  22. Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 28 April 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-04-27) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-04-27)
  23. Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 14 April 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-04-12) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-04-12)
  24. Agenda for TAG Teleconference of 24 March 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-03-23) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-03-23)
  25. Draft Minutes for March 10 Telcon (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-03-11) (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-03-11)
  26. Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 10 March 2011 (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-03-10) (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2011-03-10)
  27. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 10 March 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-03-09) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-03-09)
  28. HashInURI notes (from nathan@webr3.org on 2011-03-09) (from nathan@webr3.org on 2011-03-09)
  29. Draft minutes of the 8-10 February 2011 TAG F2F Meeting are now available (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-21) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-21)
  30. Draft minutes of the 8-10 February 2011 TAG F2F Meeting are now available (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-21) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-21)
  31. Stable agenda for TAG F2F of 8-10 February 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-05) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-02-05)
  32. Preliminary version of the Agenda for the TAG F2F Meeting of 8-10 February 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-01-30) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-01-30)
  33. Agenda for the TAG teleconference of 20 January 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-01-19) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-01-19)
  34. Re: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 13 January 2011 (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2011-01-13) (from Daniel.Appelquist@vodafone.com on 2011-01-13)
  35. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 13 January 2011 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-01-11) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2011-01-11)
  36. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 16 Dec 2010 (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2010-12-14) (from nrm@arcanedomain.com on 2010-12-14)
  37. ACTION-353: Client-side identification in Ajax applications (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-03-06) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-03-06)
  38. TAG Members: please reviews status of issues you 'shepherd' by Monday, 8 March (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-03-03) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2010-03-03)
  39. 'A proposal for making AJAX crawlable' squats in URI space, doesn't follow the principle of least power (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-12-03) (from connolly@w3.org on 2009-12-03)
  40. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 23 July 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-07-21) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-07-21)
  41. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 28 May 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-27) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-27)
  42. Draft minutes of TAG teleconference of 21 May 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-26) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-26)
  43. Next steps on TAG ISSUE-60 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-20) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-20)
  44. Agenda for 21 May 2009 TAG Teleconference and Start of F2F Agenda Planning (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-19) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-19)
  45. Minutes of the 7th May TAG teleconference (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-05-15) (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-05-15)
  46. Re: Who is willing to shepherd TAG ISSUE-60? (was: Re: [hash-in-uri] pushState()) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-11) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-11)
  47. Who is willing to shepherd TAG ISSUE-60? (was: Re: [hash-in-uri] pushState()) (from raman@google.com on 2009-05-11) (from raman@google.com on 2009-05-11)
  48. Who is willing to shepherd TAG ISSUE-60? (was: Re: [hash-in-uri] pushState()) (from raman@google.com on 2009-05-11) (from raman@google.com on 2009-05-11)
  49. Who is willing to shepherd TAG ISSUE-60? (was: Re: [hash-in-uri] pushState()) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-11) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-11)
  50. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 7 May 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-05) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-05-05)
  51. Re: ISSUE-60: Name of draft should be changed to refer to URI's not URL's (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-06) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-06)
  52. RE: ISSUE-60: Name of draft should be changed to refer to URI's not URL's (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-04-03) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-04-03)
  53. Re: ISSUE-60: Name of draft should be changed to refer to URI's not URL's (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-04-03) (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-04-03)
  54. Re: incorrect link in 04-02-agenda (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-02) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-02)
  55. Re: ISSUE-60: Name of draft should be changed to refer to URI's not URL's (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-02) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-02)
  56. Approved minutes of the TAG F2F of 3-5 March 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-02) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-02)
  57. incorrect link in 04-02-agenda (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2009-04-02) (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2009-04-02)
  58. Re: ISSUE-60: Name of draft should be changed to refer to URI's not URL's (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-04-02) (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-04-02)
  59. ISSUE-60: Important 2002 email from Roy Fielding on history of fragment identifiers (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-01) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-01)
  60. ISSUE-60: Name of draft should be changed to refer to URI's not URL's (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-01) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-04-01)
  61. Fw: Temporary publications schedule: Tuesdays and Thursdays (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-31) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-31)
  62. Setting TAG Priorities - Review of discussion and planning to date (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-22) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-22)
  63. Re: Hash In URLs: (from raman@google.com on 2009-03-16) (from raman@google.com on 2009-03-16)
  64. Re: Hash In URLs: (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-16) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-16)
  65. RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-13) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-13)
  66. Re: TAG Pending Review Action Items (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2009-03-11) (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2009-03-11)
  67. RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-11) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-11)
  68. RE: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-11) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-11)
  69. RE: Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-10) (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-10)
  70. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-10) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-10)
  71. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-10) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-10)
  72. Agenda for TAG teleconference of 12 March 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-10) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-10)
  73. TAG Pending Review Action Items (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-10) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-10)
  74. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-10) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-10)
  75. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from simonp@opera.com on 2009-03-09) (from simonp@opera.com on 2009-03-09)
  76. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-03-06) (from jonas@sicking.cc on 2009-03-06)
  77. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-06) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-06)
  78. RE: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com on 2009-03-06) (from Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com on 2009-03-06)
  79. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-06) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-06)
  80. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from lhs@malform.no on 2009-03-06) (from lhs@malform.no on 2009-03-06)
  81. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-03-05) (from john.kemp@nokia.com on 2009-03-05)
  82. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-05) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-05)
  83. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-05) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-05)
  84. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-03-05) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-03-05)
  85. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from timbl@w3.org on 2009-03-05) (from timbl@w3.org on 2009-03-05)
  86. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from steven.pemberton@cwi.nl on 2009-03-05) (from steven.pemberton@cwi.nl on 2009-03-05)
  87. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-05) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-05)
  88. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from steven.pemberton@cwi.nl on 2009-03-05) (from steven.pemberton@cwi.nl on 2009-03-05)
  89. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-05) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-05)
  90. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-03-05) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-03-05)
  91. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-05) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-05)
  92. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-05) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-05)
  93. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-05) (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-05)
  94. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04)
  95. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-03-04) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-03-04)
  96. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04)
  97. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04)
  98. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-04)
  99. Re: Hash In URLs: (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-04) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-04)
  100. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-02) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-02)
  101. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01)
  102. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01)
  103. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-03-01) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-03-01)
  104. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01)
  105. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01)
  106. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from lhs@malform.no on 2009-03-01) (from lhs@malform.no on 2009-03-01)
  107. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01)
  108. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01)
  109. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01)
  110. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01)
  111. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01)
  112. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-03-01) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-03-01)
  113. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from pjt47@cam.ac.uk on 2009-03-01) (from pjt47@cam.ac.uk on 2009-03-01)
  114. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-03-01)
  115. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-03-01) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-03-01)
  116. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-03-01)
  117. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-01) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-01)
  118. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01)
  119. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01)
  120. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01)
  121. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01)
  122. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-03-01)
  123. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-03-01)
  124. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2009-03-01) (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2009-03-01)
  125. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-03-01) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-03-01)
  126. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-01) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-03-01)
  127. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-01) (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-01)
  128. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-01) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-01)
  129. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-01) (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-01)
  130. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-01) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-03-01)
  131. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-01) (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-03-01)
  132. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-02-28) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-02-28)
  133. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  134. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  135. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-02-28) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-02-28)
  136. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  137. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-02-28) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-02-28)
  138. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-28) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-28)
  139. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-02-28) (from rsayre@mozilla.com on 2009-02-28)
  140. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-28) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-28)
  141. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-02-28) (from mjs@apple.com on 2009-02-28)
  142. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-28) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-28)
  143. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-02-28) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-02-28)
  144. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-02-28) (from karl+w3c@la-grange.net on 2009-02-28)
  145. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28)
  146. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  147. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28)
  148. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28)
  149. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  150. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  151. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28)
  152. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  153. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-28)
  154. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-28)
  155. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-02-28) (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-02-28)
  156. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-02-28) (from mnot@mnot.net on 2009-02-28)
  157. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-02-27) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2009-02-27)
  158. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-27) (from rubys@intertwingly.net on 2009-02-27)
  159. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  160. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  161. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-02-27) (from danbri@danbri.org on 2009-02-27)
  162. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27)
  163. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  164. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27)
  165. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  166. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from rob@robburns.com on 2009-02-27) (from rob@robburns.com on 2009-02-27)
  167. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27)
  168. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  169. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27)
  170. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-27) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-27)
  171. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  172. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27) (from ben@adida.net on 2009-02-27)
  173. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27)
  174. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-02-27) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-02-27)
  175. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27) (from julian.reschke@gmx.de on 2009-02-27)
  176. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-02-27) (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2009-02-27)
  177. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from shane@aptest.com on 2009-02-27) (from shane@aptest.com on 2009-02-27)
  178. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27)
  179. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from karl@la-grange.net on 2009-02-27) (from karl@la-grange.net on 2009-02-27)
  180. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27)
  181. Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27) (from hsivonen@iki.fi on 2009-02-27)
  182. Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-25) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-25)
  183. Re: Request for Agenda items for TAG Telcon of 18th December 2008 (from connolly@w3.org on 2008-12-15) (from connolly@w3.org on 2008-12-15)
  184. TAG Telcon agenda fro 8th May 2008: httpredirections-57; tagSoupIntegration-54; passwordsInThClear-52; webApplicationState-60 (from skw@hp.com on 2008-05-07) (from skw@hp.com on 2008-05-07)
  185. TAG Weekly Telcon Agenda: 20th March 2008 (from skw@hp.com on 2008-03-19) (from skw@hp.com on 2008-03-19)
  186. TAG Telcon Agenda: 13th March 2008: webApplicationState-60; tagSoupIntegration-54; UrnsAndRegistries-50; httpRedirections-57 (from skw@hp.com on 2008-03-12) (from skw@hp.com on 2008-03-12)
  187. RE: Getting Trackers attention (was RE: webApplicationState-60 (was RE: issue-60 (webApplicationState-48): Web Application State Management) (from skw@hp.com on 2007-12-17) (from skw@hp.com on 2007-12-17)
  188. Re: Getting Trackers attention (was RE: webApplicationState-60 (was RE: issue-60 (webApplicationState-48): Web Application State Management) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2007-12-14) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2007-12-14)
  189. Re: webApplicationState-60 (was RE: ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-48): Web Application State Management) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2007-12-14) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2007-12-14)
  190. webApplicationState-60 (was RE: ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-48): Web Application State Management) (from skw@hp.com on 2007-12-14) (from skw@hp.com on 2007-12-14)
  191. ISSUE-60 (webApplicationState-48): Web Application State Management (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-12-14) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-12-14)

Related notes:

TV's draft finding: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/hash-in-url.html

Norman Walsh, 5 Jun 2008, 16:51:41

updating description to point to current work

Dan Connolly, 19 May 2010, 17:46:34

Detailed discussion of #! controversy on 10 March 2011: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/03/10-minutes#item04

Noah Mendelsohn, 23 Mar 2011, 15:21:26


Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Peter Linss <w3c@linss.com>, Daniel Appelquist <appelquist@gmail.com>, Chairs, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $