ACTION-217: Raise moving the registry to w3.org with Mark Nottingham

Raise moving the registry to w3.org with Mark Nottingham

State:
closed
Person:
Jonathan Rees
Due on:
February 24, 2009
Created on:
January 29, 2009
Associated Issue:
HttpRedirections-57
Related emails:
  1. RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-13)
  2. Re: TAG Pending Review Action Items (from jar@creativecommons.org on 2009-03-11)
  3. RE: TAG Pending Review Action Items (from masinter@adobe.com on 2009-03-11)
  4. TAG Pending Review Action Items (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-03-10)
  5. Agenda for TAG Face-to-Face Meeting, 3-5 March 2009 (Redwood Shores, CA) (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-25)
  6. Approved minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-05)
  7. Re: Draft minutes for TAG telcon of 2009-01-29 (from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 2009-02-05)
  8. TAG Telcon Agenda for 5th February 2009 (from noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com on 2009-02-03)

Related notes:

Looks like Tim did this for me. See this message:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Jan/0134.html
for Mark Nottingham's assessment.

Jonathan Rees, 10 Feb 2009, 22:15:05

On 3/26/09 I (JAR) was asked to summarize how this discussion ended up.
Neither Mark Nottingham nor Lisa Dusseault was convinced of the desirability of 303s; this was after hearing all available arguments in favor. And both thought it uncertain whether IANA would implement 303s, even if IETF wanted it to (which it doesn't).
Lisa's last word in the thread:
http://w3.org/mid/E62FCCAA-F6AB-4077-991C-A7F89BA434B1@osafoundation.org
Mark's last word:
http://w3.org/mid/906D6F3A-F031-4993-8F53-F48C9E14A622@mnot.net
saying that maybe the registered link relations shouldn't have defined URIs at all. The registry would contain a set of relation-describing documents, which would have defined URIs, but the relations themselves would not have URIs.
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-04.txt
Nothing would prevent some organization (such as W3C) from giving URIs to the relations, so that they can be used as properties in RDF.

Jonathan Rees, 30 Mar 2009, 15:07:42

Display change log.


Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Peter Linss <w3c@linss.com>, Daniel Appelquist <dan@torgo.com>, Chairs, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 217.html,v 1.1 2019/11/04 16:11:50 carcone Exp $