Use Cases and Requirements/Reviews
The WG has reviewed the UC document as of v1.27 at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/ and here are these were the reviews in the period 2010-05-04 to 2010-05-10:
- Ahmed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0016.html (Sun, 9 May 2010) - DONE
- Juan: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0021.html (Sun, 9 May 2010) - DONE
- Soeren: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0023.html (Mon, 10 May 2010) - DONE
- Ted: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0029.html (Mon, 10 May 2010) - DONE
- Li Ma: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0038.html (Tue, 11 May 2010) - DONE
- Harry: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0040.html (Tue, 11 May 2010) - DONE
- Harry: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0049.html (Wed, 12 May 2010) - DONE
- Ashok: Ashok's UCR Review (Wed, 19 May 2010) - DONE
- Ahmed: Ahmed's UCR Review (Sat, 22 May 2010) - DONE
- Juan: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0083.html (Fri, 21 May 2010) - re Ashok
- Juan: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0084.html (Sat, 22 May 2010) - DONE
- Alex: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010May/0085.html (Sat, 22 May 2010) - DONE
- Souri: Souri's UCR Review (Sat, 22 May 2010) - DONE
- Why drop sec. 1.1 and sec 1.2?
- sec. 1.3 Glossary clarification
- sec. 2 Use Cases: Ashok suggests to change this completely into two different classifications
- sec. 2.2.2 - add Ashok's requirements?
- sec. 2.4.3 Derived Requirements EMPTY
- Why remove sec. 3?
see http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/,cvslog (Harry please provide dump here, this is team-only, why so ever ...)