Minutes of Transport Binding Task Force, 5 February 2002.

Attendees

Updated Action item list

ALL look through 'discussion' issues (33 57 50 178) and volunteer to
    resolve one or more
DF to put 165 133 102 on WG agenda.
DF to ping HMM for a Email Binding sumjmary
GD propose text for resolving 33 by EOW

Status of Email/SMTP binding

-- HighlandMM absent, status report postponed

Assign owners to the TBTF work items

-- issues [3]
33
GD suggests we could resolve this by saying that while we do not have an
   arch for modules, we have the concept of them
SW notes we no longer have modules
HFN thinks we have plenty of modularity in SOAP suffcient to reolve this
    issue anyway
GD will propose text

57
CF has put forward proposal, see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0060.html
GD thinks this is wrong approach
NM agrees w/GD, also thinks this is still related to our feature/binding
discussion
Short discussion ensues related to the fact that cannot assume MIME
Longer discussion ensues on the movement of such information in/out of
headers/bindings.

-- public feedback solicited by TBTF [2], how and who to respond to these
comments?
SW notes he has proposed how to respond to these comments, we'll discuss
these next mtg
    
Date of next TBTF telcon: friday, Feb 8 730-900a
    
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/01/23-tbtf
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Jan/0163.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0048.html