ALL look through 'discussion' issues (33 57 102 103 133 165 178) and volunteer to resolve one or more DF to put 58, 105 resolution on XMLP agenda GD to propose resolution text for 58 NM to propose resolution text for 105 SW 102 will see if appropriate text exists in the spec, if not will propose, in any case, will propose resolution text MH to write up compromise proposal for 103
58 - disussion of whether we have satisfied this; all in favour of closing due to our notion of features; Glen to write up resolution text 105 - discussion of whether we have satisfied this on account of faulting; decided faulting is still unresolved but it will be handled under #102; NM to write resolution text 33 - should be handled by our resolution of feature/binding discussion 57 - ditto 102 - TBTF agreed that "it is the responsibility of the specification of an MEP to say who transmits faults and to whom"; SW will see if appropriate text exists in the specification, if not he will propose such text, and he will write proposed resolution text 103 - how far to go with describing message paths?; NM suggests that multi-cast is an interesting case to consider to determine if we have it right; another way of putting it whether it should be possible to write an MEP that contains a statement like "make N copies of the message and send them to N recipients"; MH brought up discussion about distinction between transport level and SOAP level MEP; MH to write up compromise proposal